There. FTFY. Originally Posted by shanmAnother notch on your "failures belt" ... You keep proving your own deficiency.
Yes it is a valid reason if you have neither a brain nor a spine.Keep right on spankin' dat ass SOTF !
I don't give a crap that Hillary is a woman. I don't base my vote on whether a candidate has the same naughty parts as me. My standards are a little bit higher than that.
I also wouldn't give a crap if Hillary had been the greatest SOS in American History. Saying she did a decent job right up until she sat by an allowed one our ambassador's to get killed and right up until she blatantly broke the law is like saying that well, Bernie Madoff SEEMED like a good guy right up until he got caught ripping off billions, or that well, Michael Vick was a pretty good QB until he got caught torturing and killing dogs for money.
The fact that the best endorsement you can make for her is that she had a "decent" track record just makes you and Assup all the more pathetic. You can't even bring yourself to admit she is a fraud, an incompetent, and a moron. How's that "re-set button" from Staples working out for us with Russia? How's that apology tour she did in Mexico working out for us?
The truth is, she accomplished NOTHING as SOS. There are NO accomplishments, decent or otherwise, that you can point to as her legacy of success, but we can sure as hell point to her massive screw ups, and her blatant criminal actions. You DO realize that Petraeus was just convicted of the very behavior Hillary just rubbed in the nation's face, right? Mishandling of classified information by Petraeus = crucify him. Mishandling of classified information by Hillary = no worries, she was decent enough, so I will vote for her anyways.
PS. Do NOT insult our intelligence by trying to pretend that she somehow miraculously never discussed ANY classified information through email throughout her time as SOS.
I knew your IQ was less than impressive. It would appear though, that it may actually be in the negatives. Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh
She's a Democrat. If she wins the nomination, I'll vote for her. Originally Posted by Yssup RiderYou are stupid yet loyal to a fault.
You are stupid yet loyal to a fault. So that's how you came to vote for Obama ? Originally Posted by riosecoThe salivation of folks like YR begins when they finally decide to vote, and in predictable "Pavlovic" fashion it is simply less challenging to vote a "straight" ticket regardless of who is on the ballot. Once they enter the realm of "ballot splitting" they actually have to have had some "learning" of the candidates in the local races to make an intelligent and meaningful selection in order to actually IMPROVE the body of "government" with which they have the greatest regular contact.
The salivation of folks like YR begins when they finally decide to vote, and in predictable "Pavlovic" fashion it is simply less challenging to vote a "straight" ticket regardless of who is on the ballot. Once they enter the realm of "ballot splitting" they actually have to have had some "learning" of the candidates in the local races to make an intelligent and meaningful selection in order to actually IMPROVE the body of "government" with which they have the greatest regular contact.So says the Founder & 'Ranking Member' of the exclusive (Klan, errr Clan Members only), ECCIE Political Forum, Strom Thurmond Democrat's For A Better America Club.
As Texas increasingly approached a "two-party" state the Democrats had to field a better quality of candidates to compete with the previously ineffective Republican Party. The pendulum has not shifted to the Republican Party and the quality of Democrats who throw their "hat in the ring" is as low as it was before when they only had to have a "Democrat" printed on their card with the obligatory union "stamp" to reflect their loyalty to socialistic values and to receive their customary donations and support from the "bosses."
He just hasn't matured intellectually from the training, which explains his socially and culturally "correct" vote for Obaminable, which shielded him from the accusation of being a "racist" by opposing the "first Black President" of the United States of America. He now has to constantly justify it. Originally Posted by LexusLover
The salivation of folks like YR begins when they finally decide to vote, and in predictable "Pavlovic" fashion it is simply less challenging to vote a "straight" ticket regardless of who is on the ballot. Once they enter the realm of "ballot splitting" they actually have to have had some "learning" of the candidates in the local races to make an intelligent and meaningful selection in order to actually IMPROVE the body of "government" with which they have the greatest regular contact.You use a lot of words to say very little.
As Texas increasingly approached a "two-party" state the Democrats had to field a better quality of candidates to compete with the previously ineffective Republican Party. The pendulum has not shifted to the Republican Party and the quality of Democrats who throw their "hat in the ring" is as low as it was before when they only had to have a "Democrat" printed on their card with the obligatory union "stamp" to reflect their loyalty to socialistic values and to receive their customary donations and support from the "bosses."
He just hasn't matured intellectually from the training, which explains his socially and culturally "correct" vote for Obaminable, which shielded him from the accusation of being a "racist" by opposing the "first Black President" of the United States of America. He now has to constantly justify it. Originally Posted by LexusLover