The desperation is pretty thick around here

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!

We rate JDrunk's statements as FULL OF SHIT!

And, did someone hear a late model HUFF drive up???

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAA!

We rate JDrunk's statements as FULL OF SHIT!

And, did someone hear a late model HUFF drive up??? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I really don't understand this, I don't drink alcohol and have said so many times...is some idiot so brain dead that he doesn't know he sounds just like an idiot when he says otherwise?

I really don't understand this, I don't drink alcohol and have said so many times...is some idiot so brain dead that he doesn't know he sounds just like an idiot when he says otherwise? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

The same idiot that was the 3 time winner of the DOTY award ? And one that's so used to groping for answers ( and his other reach around crew member's " members " ! ) that it's now just an impulse like breathing for him to grope for shit ! ? That idiot ?

LMAO at JDrunk.

He'd better hope he's a drunk. Otherwise he's a blithering idiot with issues that go far beyond simply collecting photos of other guys' JUNK.

It's New Year's Eve. Be safe out there y'all.

[QUOTE=JD Barleycorn;1057616974]The problem with you Munkin is that you don't know when you're being lied to. If you're talking I do. Ben Carson...100% untruth? No one said that, asshole. Out of true, mostly true, half true, mostly false, false, and pants on fire, he had no "true" statements. Those six terms were the context in which the whole post was given. Don't act super stupid and say you didn't know that. Right there you know that this is some kind of parody or an out and out lie.Wrong. It's neither Yet, you believe it....why? I believe the option you didn't even consider or mention. That it's correct and you're wrong. Guess what the right answer is. You already gave 2 wrong ones and I told you the correct one.Anyone with any common sense would know that no one (not even Hillary) is a 100% liar, but Ben Carson? Learn to read. No one said he is a 100% liar. Your credibility dropped to zero at that point. My credibility stands untouched by you. Yours stands unchanged also. It's still 0.Also, according to political there are lies and there are lies. If Donald Trump says that his building is the tallest in...oh, Florida (and it was when it was built) and it's not now, then that is a lie the equivalent of Hillary saying that she arrived in Bosnia under sniper fire. Politico says that they are the same... Hell, they even give Hillary credit for only partially lying about that day. Since there was gun fire in the distance somewhere then he saying that they landed under fire was partially true according to Politico. Ask any soldier, hearing gunshots in the distance and being under sniper fire are two very different animals.
The previous is all moot because it uses j-douche logic. He says the examples he comes up with are just like the ones politico would use. No links to prove he is a psychic who knows what they would have used. He doesn't see if you say a building is the tallest, and it is at that time, they don't come back later when it's no longer the tallest and claim you lied. He doesn't have a clue about what context is or how it's used.

Of course I could point out the obvious, that Hillary had made far fewer statements, given less press time than anyone in this election cycle
What a moron. That is the obvious that I'm pointing out.
The number of statements, each of these people has made, evaluated by politifact.

• Clinton 122
• Trump 72
• Rubio 122
• Bush 72
• Sanders 45
• Carson 22
• Cruz 72

All these numbers were in my post. Of course if you can't add........ [QUOTE]

I'm not going to use you as the lowest common denominator. You are way below that. This is the beauty of the private sector. As an instructor I would give up on you. You take way too much of the resources available to the class. You take more time, more money, and plus the most obvious thing of all, you slow the other students down. In the private sector I have no moral obligation to help you succeed. Only a professional one. And I've more than fulfilled that. You would be sent back to your parent company without your certification. Maybe they would let you work on other OEMs equipment.. Good luck with that.

[QUOTE=Munchmasterman;105764421 5]

The problem with you Munkin is that you don't know when you're being lied to. If you're talking I do. Ben Carson...100% untruth? No one said that, asshole. Out of true, mostly true, half true, mostly false, false, and pants on fire, he had no "true" statements. Those six terms were the context in which the whole post was given. Don't act super stupid and say you didn't know that. Right there you know that this is some kind of parody or an out and out lie.Wrong. It's neither Yet, you believe it....why? I believe the option you didn't even consider or mention. That it's correct and you're wrong. Guess what the right answer is. You already gave 2 wrong ones and I told you the correct one.Anyone with any common sense would know that no one (not even Hillary) is a 100% liar, but Ben Carson? Learn to read. No one said he is a 100% liar. Your credibility dropped to zero at that point. My credibility stands untouched by you. Yours stands unchanged also. It's still 0.Also, according to political there are lies and there are lies. If Donald Trump says that his building is the tallest in...oh, Florida (and it was when it was built) and it's not now, then that is a lie the equivalent of Hillary saying that she arrived in Bosnia under sniper fire. Politico says that they are the same... Hell, they even give Hillary credit for only partially lying about that day. Since there was gun fire in the distance somewhere then he saying that they landed under fire was partially true according to Politico. Ask any soldier, hearing gunshots in the distance and being under sniper fire are two very different animals.
The previous is all moot because it uses j-douche logic. He says the examples he comes up with are just like the ones politico would use. No links to prove he is a psychic who knows what they would have used. He doesn't see if you say a building is the tallest, and it is at that time, they don't come back later when it's no longer the tallest and claim you lied. He doesn't have a clue about what context is or how it's used.

Of course I could point out the obvious, that Hillary had made far fewer statements, given less press time than anyone in this election cycle
What a moron. That is the obvious that I'm pointing out.
The number of statements, each of these people has made, evaluated by politifact.

• Clinton 122
• Trump 72
• Rubio 122
• Bush 72
• Sanders 45
• Carson 22
• Cruz 72

All these numbers were in my post. Of course if you can't add........ [QUOTE]

I'm not going to use you as the lowest common denominator. You are way below that. This is the beauty of the private sector. As an instructor I would give up on you. You take way too much of the resources available to the class. You take more time, more money, and plus the most obvious thing of all, you slow the other students down. In the private sector I have no moral obligation to help you succeed. Only a professional one. And I've more than fulfilled that. You would be sent back to your parent company without your certification. Maybe they would let you work on other OEMs equipment.. Good luck with that. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Go back and read...and then think. You forgot the last thing. They are pretty selective about what they call "opinion" and what they call "statements". Like I pointed out, if Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State renders an opinion then that opinion carries the weight of a "professional". In other words, not exactly opinion just like in a courtroom. So when Hillary says that Assad is a reformer (which she did) then we have to assume that it is fact...but she was wrong. Completely wrong. She also said that Libya was better off without Khadadffi...also wrong. Her reset on Russia...wrong again.
Back to Carson though, so you're telling me that when Carson says that he is a pediatric surgeon then he is not quite telling the whole truth? He has said that you know and since your source says that he has not told the complete truth about anything...either Carson was lying about being a surgeon or your source is kind of crappy. So which is it? You're foisting crap off on us or Carson is not a surgeon?

[QUOTE=JD Barleycorn;1057644241]

Go back and read...and then think. You forgot the last thing. They are pretty selective about what they call "opinion" and what they call "statements". Like I pointed out, if Hillary Clinton, Secretary of State renders an opinion then that opinion carries the weight of a "professional". How thick are you? What they call an "opinion" or "statement"? How could that be more straight forward?They don't rate opinions. A "statement" is something a person said. Something on the public record or caught on tape. If there is a dispute whether or not the person said something, it's not rated In other words, not exactly opinion just like in a courtroom. So when Hillary says that Assad is a reformer (which she did) then we have to assume that it is fact...but she was wrong We have to assume it as fact? You are a total dumbass. In a courtroom you have to prove facts. More importantly now we know why you furnish no links. 2 reasons. The first reason is you can't produce what you've never seen or looked for. The second is more telling. Why should you have to when that mean Hillary doesn't have to? Right? Completely wrong. She also said that Libya was better off without Khadadffi...also wrong. Her reset on Russia...wrong again.
Back to Carson though, so you're telling me that when Carson says that he is a pediatric surgeon then he is not quite telling the whole truth? WTF are you talking about? There is a set of statements with the link I provided. And I'm damn sure that him being asked if he was a surgeon wasn't one of them. Pull your head out of your ass He has said that you know and since your source says that he has not told the complete truth about anything...either Carson was lying about being a surgeon or your source is kind of crappy. So which is it? You're foisting crap off on us or Carson is not a surgeon? Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

They don't rate opinions. I never said they did. Rating opinions is a red herring that has nothing to do with fact checking statements.
At this point you don't have to be Jesus to walk on this desperation. It would hold up a car.

So what did you get your latest degree in, JDrunk? Sanitary management? Neurosurgery?

Some people (and Munchkins) are just too far out there to have a conversation with.



Munchkin brought along a "friend".

JDrunk represents the Lollipop Guild

Some people (and Munchkins) are just too far out there to have a conversation with.



Munchkin brought along a "friend". Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Too far out there? From the guy who turned a simple statement with an objective set of numbers into a convoluted thesis with subjective answers?
Poor attempt at deflection.
So you just roll over and offer up your throat (for any purpose)? You can't refute, rebut, or do anything except crawl away. If only your students could see you now. At least you don't have to have any links to the sheer number of times you've done it

Too far out there? yada yada yada Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

On your signature line below, do you mean to imply everyone is alone morally responsible for their actions?

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”
― Robert A. Heinlein

On your signature line below, do you mean to imply everyone is alone morally responsible for their actions?

“I am free, no matter what rules surround me. If I find them tolerable, I tolerate them; if I find them too obnoxious, I break them. I am free because I know that I alone am morally responsible for everything I do.”
― Robert A. Heinlein Originally Posted by DSK

I meant to imply what I quoted. That is my belief (notice all the "I"s in there) for my actions.
If you want to be truly free you have to accept personal and moral responsibility for your actions. Our morals may or may not be the same. I know mine but not yours.
You believe what ever you what to.

I meant to imply what I quoted. That is my belief (notice all the "I"s in there) for my actions.
If you want to be truly free you have to accept personal and moral responsibility for your actions. Our morals may or may not be the same. I know mine but not yours.
You believe what ever you what to. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

So a criminal is not truly free if he blames other factors (such as poverty, racism, etc) for his crimes?