Farm Bailout so far has doubled the Auto Bailout of 2009

The auto loans were paid back....the farm subsidies are just welfare.

You may think it smart like government subsidies to say electric car buyers.

But they are welfare...not sure why you Trumpettes are so hypocritical about these things.


. Originally Posted by WTF

It's funny watching you try and back peddle your ridiculous posts titles that you get suckered into posting without thinking through.

So now you apparently agree that the auto bailout and the farm "subsidies"(not now a bailout) are indeed not an apples to apples comparison.

And to call the auto bailouts as "paid" back is rather laughable as well. Weren't they to the tune of about $85 Billion when doled out?
eccieuser9500's Avatar
An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II. Originally Posted by WTF








winn dixie's Avatar
An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II. Originally Posted by WTF
Since you support wealth redistribution why dont you donate your finances to this cause!
Butt, you never put your money where your mouth is!!

typical lib, always someone elses money
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-08-2019, 01:08 PM
It's funny watching you try and back peddle your ridiculous posts titles that you get suckered into posting without thinking through.

So now you apparently agree that the auto bailout and the farm "subsidies"(not now a bailout) are indeed not an apples to apples comparison.

And to call the auto bailouts as "paid" back is rather laughable as well. Weren't they to the tune of about $85 Billion when doled out? Originally Posted by eccielover
The euro and bank bailout was paid back in full with a profit....though as the article points out at a huge nutcase cost as it brought us you fucking Tea Party fruitcakes who are so fucking stupid you are now defending farm welfare!

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/b...rom%20%251%24s
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 12-08-2019, 01:11 PM
Since you support wealth redistribution why dont you donate your finances to this cause!
Butt, you never put your money where your mouth is!!

typical lib, always someone elses money Originally Posted by winn dixie
Every God damn tax is wealth redistribution you ignorant reyrey sounding political wannabe.

I have Luke on speed dial.
winn dixie's Avatar
Every God damn tax is wealth redistribution you ignorant reyrey sounding political wannabe.

I have Luke on speed dial. Originally Posted by WTF
Every tax is wealth redistribution? You really are as clueless as your posts!

Heres your sign.. So you just admitted you like and want more taxes!! and promote policies that produce more income equality.
Your own words in commie red you fucking commie! Major gotcha moment
eccieuser9500's Avatar
How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren

As the 2020 campaign has unfolded, Warren has, if anything, tacked toward Bernie, embracing “Medicare for All” and free college, and making a wealth tax the centerpiece of her platform. Still,in the pages of Jacobin, Warren has gone from seeming like a close second to Sanders to being a member of the neoliberal opposition, perhaps made even worse by her desire to claim the mantle of the party’s left.

By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693
  • Tiny
  • 12-08-2019, 01:42 PM
An the Republican Party should quit trying to protect dynastic wealth and promote policies that produce more income equality.

The Gini coefficient is at levels last seen before the Great Depression.

We have another one of those and it will be FDR II. Originally Posted by WTF
Is the goal to help people at the bottom of the ladder so they become more prosperous? Or to make everyone poorer, especially the wealthy? Warren's and Sanders' policies would accomplish the latter.

According to the OECD, the USA has the most progressive tax system among developed countries.

Is there good data for the Gini coefficient going back to before the Great Depression? I'm not sure. In any event, if you adjust for taxes and transfers, the Gini coefficient now would be significantly lower. You're probably looking at data that use before tax income, and don't account for progressive taxation, social security, welfare, Medicare and Medicaid, the earned income tax credit, etc.

https://www.cato.org/publications/po...redistribution
eccieuser9500's Avatar
Is the goal to help people at the bottom of the ladder so they become more prosperous? Or to make everyone poorer, especially the wealthy? Warren's and Sanders' policies would accomplish the latter.

According to the OECD, the USA has the most progressive tax system among developed countries.

Is there good data for the Gini coefficient going back to before the Great Depression? I'm not sure. In any event, if you adjust for taxes and transfers, the Gini coefficient now would be significantly lower. You're probably looking at data that use before tax income, and don't account for progressive taxation, social security, welfare, Medicare and Medicaid, the earned income tax credit, etc.

https://www.cato.org/publications/po...redistribution Originally Posted by Tiny

I have to dig here. How do you turn the wealthy "poor"? Do you mean "less wealthy"?








  • oeb11
  • 12-08-2019, 02:00 PM
How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren




By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693 Originally Posted by eccieuser9500



‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’
eccieuser9500's Avatar
‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’ Originally Posted by oeb11
AWWWW - Poor DPST's complaining about their own lack of "Diversity"
They face a POTUS they are Impeaching - what is to worry????
Not enough candidates of color - and of course - the DPSY's aren't RACIST about their platform. Sure looks like they don't like their white candidates.

Of course - Warren is 1/1024 "Indian" - although he tests are South American DNA - she can put on a sombrero and spout - Ai, ai , ai , ai!!!
Poor Racist DPST's
- stuck with old , senile, angry white folks as the "White Meat Alternative " to Trump!


LOL Originally Posted by oeb11
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
How the Cool Kids of the Left Turned on Elizabeth Warren




By RUAIRÍ ARRIETA-KENNA

https://www.politico.com/news/magazi...st-left-072693 Originally Posted by eccieuser9500

when Kool kids grow up they become conservatives.


BAHHAHHAHAAAA
  • Tiny
  • 12-08-2019, 02:40 PM
I have to dig here. How do you turn the wealthy "poor"? Do you mean "less wealthy"? Originally Posted by eccieuser9500
Yes. "Make everyone poorer" in this context means "make everyone worse off."
  • Tiny
  • 12-08-2019, 02:42 PM
‘If You Are Not a Liberal When You Are Young, You Have No Heart, and If You Are Not a Conservative When Old, You Have No Brain’ Originally Posted by oeb11
when Kool kids grow up they become conservatives.
BAHHAHHAHAAAA Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
I'm not sure about the Millenials. They're a different breed, and more of them will be voting than baby boomers before long.
The euro and bank bailout was paid back in full with a profit....though as the article points out at a huge nutcase cost as it brought us you fucking Tea Party fruitcakes who are so fucking stupid you are now defending farm welfare!

https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/20/b...rom%20%251%24s Originally Posted by WTF
First off, where did I defend farm welfare anywhere.

I'm simply pointing out your ridiculous OP comparison of the Farm "bailout" so far being double the Auto Bailout.

And now you post something showing a profit on the original bank and auto bailout a full six years after it took place.

You really do get caught up in the rhetoric you read without thinking it through don't you.