Decisions on ISOs

I fukin love to hear that somebody swallows, even if its a krum.

Another reason to read others ISO's. You can learn a lot about a persons menu when they reply. Originally Posted by threepeckeredbillygoat

Everyone on this board speaks their mind and it is high time I get to speak mine.
I had no dog in this fight, but you can bet I got one now...
My comments are in red.

Why did you post it (because I can) then if it was not directed at anyone and you just posted it for the hell of posting something (yep, basically). why waste yourtime (same reason you waste yours) and end up looking like part of the problem vs part of the solution? (pot calling the kettle black) Such as maybe posting..."I don't see why certain people have turned this thread into an attack on Amber (please show me where I attacked Amber) instead of helping Miss Blue with her original request (why didnt you?) ..." But then again, what do I know... (how to scam and rip people off) Personally, I totally agree with Texasquest. Crap like this where people take out vendettas against each other is leaving a foul taste in my mouth. (trywashing your mouth out with soap) It defeats the ultimate purpose of this board which is to have fun and stay safe.

I say we get back on track, (of course it's OK for you to get off track) bypass the BULL SHIT and just GET NAKED!! Originally Posted by mercianna

First let me say I have been in the hobby for a little over 5 years without one personal problem on this board; no stalkers, rip offs, shortages and no, not even any NCNS's unlike others.. Hum

Fawn is not perfect, I never claimed to be so don't put me on a damn pedestal. I am only human like the rest of us, but one thing that is perfect and that is my business.

If I am going to get called out for saying "OUCH" in a thread (YA I SAID IT, AND I OWN IT!) you should pick your battles wisely (and I am about to pick mine) and if you want to slam me for it, at least I deserve it this time.

LITTLE HONEY, Ms. Drama Queen yourself, don't worry your pretty little head about me and what I do with MY time, because I don't live on this board like you do. No, I am too busy making money, something evidently you know nothing about.

You only know how to post threads begging for gas money for a friend and use it for other things. ( this is why you are upset with me now because I questioned your motive in that thread ) http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=579263 post #20
You continue to no-show people, give lousy service and I could go on or go find all your threads where you begged for something but I won't everyone knows about you.

And I don't cause DRAMA little honey that is your thing, maybe you should try searching your own name and see what you come up with.
You really need to check your glass house for cracks before you throw stones at someone else!

Now let me quote mercianna, I say we get back on track, bypass the BULL SHIT and just GET NAKED!!

D-D-D-DAMNIT BOY!!!

I think somebody has had enough of the B-B-B-BULLSHIT!!!

This is the co-ed forum is it not? So why get all butt hurt and start ripping into the ladies who weigh in on this topic?

There's about 7 or 8 women on Eccie, who are CONSTANTLY replying to these ISO's pretty much all of them, on a daily basis. I agree fully with what was stated earlier, it looks like desperation. It's also annoying when you post what you're looking for, and you get a response from someone that says, "I may not be what you're looking for but I'm available". Another annoying one is when you post that you are looking for something in a specific area and you get responses from women who are not even close to the area you are looking for.
There are several ladies on here that have PMed me , every time I have posted an ISO. Several weren't my type and I never responded, yet they still PM me, anytime I post an ISO. If I didn't respond the first few times, why would you keep PMing me? You obviously aren't my type, otherwise I would have written you back or set up a session. One in particular, has taken it a step further, and proceeds to IM me every time I go into the chat room, yet I never respond. HUGE turnoff

Yep and alot of the BS here is a MOD of all people is allowed to continue to Hijack this thread for her personal Tirade..Why cant she go start her own thread to bash people..The OP asked about the Guys opinions on the ISO's yet Some here keep turning this into a Cat fight..and looks like a MOD is alowed to keep stirring the pot..is just my opinion ...

How has she hijacked this thread? She posted a picture and said "ouch" in response to stuff that was previously written. Then you started bashing her, so she responded. She and the other ladies who responded, offered their opinions, and some actual advice. If you're going to claim thread hi jacking, technically you're the biggest offender here, because you keep turning it into this argument. A question was asked, and people responded and offered their opinions. The last several pages of this has turned into a big rant. Lighten up

How has she hijacked this thread? She posted a picture and said "ouch" in response to stuff that was previously written. Then you started bashing her, so she responded. She and the other ladies who responded, offered their opinions, and some actual advice. If you're going to claim thread hi jacking, technically you're the biggest offender here, because you keep turning it into this argument. A question was asked, and people responded and offered their opinions. The last several pages of this has turned into a big rant. Lighten up Originally Posted by tattman71

The OP asked the guys Opinion not the ladys...She didnt ask why the ladys posted there... then it turned into a Catfight and Fawn ( who as MOD should know better) added her 2 cents to stir up the crap..She now hijacks it again by bashing Merci...She is free to start her own thread for that..No one is stopping her..Why does she need to hijack this one when that has nothing to do with the original Question from the OP..

Texasquest...you can stop with the "hijack" comments. It's not a hijack. It's called "a discussion." Not all posts on a thread will directly relate to the original post. Threads have a flow. This one has CLEARLY gone to the worse, but those replies including yours, are flowing with the topic at hand.

Fact: Amber made this post about herself. She was the first to take the topic from missblue's OP and insert provider comments about ISO. If anyone starts with infractions for a hijack, it's her.
Fact: Ze and others called attention to the post made by Amber. They followed the topic too, and/or responded to previous comments. It's not a hijack to do so.

Threads develop. They change. They have more than just ONE topic. IT"S OK. To quote the guideline:

#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.

You are guilty of the crime you are trying to report. Like speeding to the police station to report someone speeding. So STOP. Or at least, stop making comments that "providers should not reply" since it's the co-ed forum.

That said: pointing out facts or fallacies isn't a hijack. Nor is replying to a post prior in the thread. People seem quick to scream "hijack" when their posts get called into question. That's not what a hijack is.

People can disagree. It's OK. I promise...people having opinions, even those that are disagreeable, is OK.

Dude, its a co-ed forum. Who cares if the girls respond too. It's like every other discussion on here, in every other forum, people don't always share the same views.

Texasquest...you can stop with the "hijack" comments. It's not a hijack. It's called "a discussion." Not all posts on a thread will directly relate to the original post. Threads have a flow. This one has CLEARLY gone to the worse, but those replies including yours, are flowing with the topic at hand.

Fact: Amber made this post about herself. She was the first to take the topic from missblue's OP and insert provider comments about ISO. If anyone starts with infractions for a hijack, it's her.
Fact: Ze and others called attention to the post made by Amber. They followed the topic too, and/or responded to previous comments. It's not a hijack to do so.

Threads develop. They change. They have more than just ONE topic. IT"S OK. To quote the guideline:



You are guilty of the crime you are trying to report. Like speeding to the police station to report someone speeding. So STOP. Or at least, stop making comments that "providers should not reply" since it's the co-ed forum.

That said: pointing out facts or fallacies isn't a hijack. Nor is replying to a post prior in the thread. People seem quick to scream "hijack" when their posts get called into question. That's not what a hijack is.

People can disagree. It's OK. I promise...people having opinions, even those that are disagreeable, is OK. Originally Posted by Duke of G

Hmm Looks like double speak here...you even posted the Guideline that states " Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. " it goes on to say "Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not. " You and i both said Amber steered the Post about her and not towards the orifinal OP's question...which you stated " Amber made this post about herself. She was the first to take the topic from missblue's OP and insert provider comments about ISO" by the Guidelines and your admission that is a hijack...with that said then any comment to her post is also a Hijack...You even posted the Guideline itself ..but just for clarifaction here it is again....#6 - Respect the topics presented by those who start a thread. Attempts to derail a thread or change it's direction is referred to as thread hijack and will be discouraged. Attempts to guide a thread in the right direction are appreciated, while responses to posts which hijack a thread are not.
Then you go on to say " It's not a hijack. It's called "a discussion." Not all posts on a thread will directly relate to the original post." You need to be consistent here..In one breath you say its a Hijack..then in the next breath you say its not...If as you stated it started when Amber posted about how she used ISO's then any of the Replys about her post aare also a continuation of that Hijack...refer to Rule# 6 which you Posted ..but in this case you seem to overlook that fact and now try to call it a "FLOW OF DISCUSSION"..well what is it ..seems to me and to alot of others if a MOD hadnt been stirring up the Pot and kept turning this into a cat fight the Op may have had some better answers to her original questions? which was " i respond to ISOs regularly and was just wondering if the way we respond or what we say has anything to do with you guys decision on who your going to pick"


where in that question does she ask How FAWN,Ze,Lil Miss,Grace ,et all felt about each other??? Where in that question does the OP ask for the discussion to turn into a CatFight??
Now here we are discussing how the rules around here are not enforced equally for all.or they are bent to appease some but not others .This i agree has nothing to do at all to the OP's original post..But if this had been steered back by a Mod instead of said MOD dogpiling and turning it into her own personal tirade and Rant against other Providers we wouldnt be having this discussion at all..You wouldnt have had to come and try to use double speak to squelch it...Sorry if i offend anyone it is what it is..another showcase for the KEYBOARD WARRIORS to earn Brownie points..at least thats what it looks like from here...Is only my opinion and a few others too..but what do we know??? Would be nice to get this back on track but by now i think that is a moot point as it has been derailed so bad it wont do any good..

Dude, its a co-ed forum. Who cares if the girls respond too. It's like every other discussion on here, in every other forum, people don't always share the same views. Originally Posted by tattman71

Dude yes its a Co-ed forum But the OP asked for the GUYS OPINION...not the Gals...No one said we all had to have the same view...Thats what she was asking..she wanted all the GUYS different views..I dont think she is trying to sell her Product to the Ladys..I think her target audience here is the GUYS !!!!

*sniff sniff*

Do I smell the ban hammer warming up?

Must be good to do outside reveiw with pics with mod.. lmao...

anyone else gettting the favortism.. doubt it... should've see him before he became mod...

remember this post when I'm "banned"...

shoudl've gave him the "free lunch or dinner" he wanted before becoming a mod... but I'm not that desperate so I never settled... sorry MOD

You have WAAAAAAAYYY too much free time with all the cutting and pasting you do of other peoples comments. You are quite possibly the biggest white knight I have ever seen on here. We know she asked for the guys opinions, but guess what, the ladies weighed in on it too, and spoke facts and truths, as well as opinions, don't like it, too bad, it's a public co-ed forum. This didn't turn into a catfight. It was a couple of comments and people defending themselves. You are blowing this insanely out of proportion. As I stated earlier, if anyone has taken this post off track, it's you with your nonstop complaining

Texas Quest: Then let me clarify. If anything was a hijack, and so off topic, it was Amber's first post. The responses to it are consistent with the concept of discussion. If anyone were to be pointed, it would be her.

Most of the other so-called-hijack posts have responded to the OP...in EXACTLY the way that you did: by commenting on a previous post, then to the OP as well. Clever post strategies aside, it's all valid content.

I'm being consistent. You are overreacting to the 'cat fight' and the concept of hijacking. Your attitude that a "MOD" (I have no idea why you insist on capitalizing it. Is it some sort of acronym? Or are you just 'loudly' stating a point?) did some further damage by replying IN CONTEXT to the thread, is not accurate.

And Amber...your thinly veiled accusation is bullshit, and you know it. I won't be the one that bans you. The rest of the staff can make that call. Your infraction history speaks for itself. And while I've defended you over bullshit claims of fake reviews, your own behavior will be that which gets you banned. Don't try and drum up some Mandela-like support prior to your OWN self-destruction.