The Punisher has arrived!

And you're dumb af....a zoo monkey.
What you numbnuts can't seem to grasp is that the Russian investigation wasn't triggered by Trump's push tape. Originally Posted by WTF
... HEE HEE! ... I almost spilled-over me beer!

... WE DON'T BELIEVE YOU! ...

#### Salty
bambino's Avatar
And you're dumb af....a zoo monkey.
What you numbnuts can't seem to grasp is that the Russian investigation wasn't triggered by Trump's push tape. Originally Posted by WTF
But but but Poofter. Your avatar is a MONKEY!!!!


You dumbfuck
bambino's Avatar
If Hillary is called to testify and she shows up, someone had better fingerprint her, because many or most patriots believe she’s already been executed.
bambino's Avatar
President Donald J. Trump:

Robby Mook just admitted that the Campaign Fraud was committed by Hillary Clinton together with her same cast of characters. It’s the biggest story on the internet, but the Fake News refuses to report it! They have lost all credibility with the People. We can’t have a great Country without a free and respected Media!
bambino's Avatar
bambino's Avatar
Kash Patel on the latest Durham developments:

I'm in court today at Sussman trial. Monster evidence submitted by prosecution. Perkins Coei got paid $3 million+ in 2016/2017 by tech exec Joffe’s company. And Joffe was on the books as an FBI source the entire time.

What is Chris Wray doing allowing this criminal clown show to operate under his FBI leadership???


Yes im actually watching the Sussmam trial live today.

Biggest takeaway:
Joffe is the Steele of the Alfa Bank fantasy. Joffe an FBI source for years, violated his contract with the FBI as a source by leaking to the media and injecting false info to multiple agents to create circular reporting… sound familiar, just like Steele.

Govt rested on my interrogation of sussman from 2018, they read the transcript for the jury where he said he was doing it all for a client.
lustylad's Avatar
Yes i'm actually watching the Sussman trial live today. Originally Posted by bambino
Where? What channel? I probably can't follow it, but I appreciate your updates.
bambino's Avatar
Where? What channel? I probably can't follow it, but I appreciate your updates. Originally Posted by lustylad
That was Kash Patel. He was in the courtroom. But, your welcome.
bambino's Avatar
bambino's Avatar
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-26-2022, 07:18 AM
Where? What channel? I probably can't follow it, but I appreciate your updates. Originally Posted by lustylad
That was Kash Patel. He was in the courtroom. But, your welcome. Originally Posted by bambino
Did you two Trump economic experts wanna bet on whether Sussman gets convicted or not?

Evidently you two are getting your criminal law advice from the same source you got your economic advice on the Trump economy. ..Donald J Trump!


"The FBI was "wary of being played" and was "very wary of being sucked into that kind effort," Baker said, explaining why he would've liked to know if Sussmann came on Clinton's behalf.
Did the alleged lie even matter?
To win a conviction, Durham must convince the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that Sussmann lied to Baker, and that the lie was "material" enough to influence the FBI's actions or decisions.
If Sussmann told Baker during the meeting that he was representing Clinton, Baker said he "would have asked more questions," and may have brought in the FBI agents who handled the Clinton email investigation, or the agents who were handling the early Trump-Russia probe.
This testimony might help undo some of the damage from FBI agent Scott Hellmann, who performed the initial technical analysis of Sussmann's tip, and earlier testified that he wouldn't have done anything differently about the data if he had known it originated from a partisan source.
Also, one day before the meeting, Sussmann texted Baker that they urgently needed to talk, saying, "I'm coming on my own -- not on behalf of a client or company." Durham didn't charge this as a false statement, but it could influence jury deliberations. Baker testified that he wouldn't have scheduled the meeting if Sussmann disclosed that he was representing the campaign.
The defense has argued that the alleged lie didn't matter -- and wasn't "material" -- because Sussmann was well-known within the FBI for representing the Democratic National Committee after it was hacked by Russia. Baker acknowledged in cross-examination that by the time he met Sussmann, he was aware of about Sussmann's work for the DNC and Clinton campaign."
bambino's Avatar
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 05-26-2022, 07:56 AM
https://t.me/rrndaily/384349 Originally Posted by bambino
Is that a bet bambam?

Do you think Sussman is going to be convicted?

Do you understand that Clinton had nothing to do with Trump being investigated by the FBI?
Why_Yes_I_Do's Avatar
...Do you think Sussman is going to be convicted? -- Yup

Do you understand that Clinton had nothing to do with Trump being investigated by the FBI? -- Nope
bambino's Avatar
...Do you think Sussman is going to be convicted? -- Yup

Do you understand that Clinton had nothing to do with Trump being investigated by the FBI? -- Nope Originally Posted by Why_Yes_I_Do
The case is iron clad. But the jury is rigged.