Too many big words Originally Posted by discreetgent
Is there some part of the phrase "eliminate preferential treatment for capital gains" that you failed to understand?I'm not sure that it would raise that much money, although I expect that it would raise some, especially if you treated cap gains and dividends identially so that there was no market incentive to structure the financed of companies to favor one over the other. However, to me, it is as much an issue of economic fairness as anything. Warren Buffet's oft told story of how his secretary pays a much greater percentage of her income in income taxes (since it's salary) than he pays of his (since it's all cap gains) perfectly illustrates this point.
The guy to whose post I responded wasn't talking about a 15% or 20% cap gains tax rate; he apparently advocates raising it now to 35% and eventually to 39.6%. I assume he thinks that would raise a lot of additional revenue. It wouldn't. It would primarily just produce distortions. Originally Posted by CaptainMidnight
In addition, I would eliminate the funding of foreign governments' militaries. It only gets us in trouble with the new government when (not if, when) there is a revolution. And it would save us billions.Are you going to be consistent and refuse to help fund the Saudi military? What would you propose doing when they cut their supply of oil in half and the price of oil doubles? They get the same income and we're economically crippled. At that point, cutting off the financial aid that we give them looks penny wise and pound foolish.
No more financing the Shah of Iran. No more financing Egyptian military. And especially, no more financing Israel. Let every country make it or break it on their own. Same principle as capitalism. Originally Posted by charlestudor2005
Are you going to be consistent and refuse to help fund the Saudi military? What would you propose doing when they cut their supply of oil in half and the price of oil doubles? They get the same income and we're economically crippled. At that point, cutting off the financial aid that we give them looks penny wise and pound foolish. Originally Posted by TexTushHogIt would be penny wise pund foolish on the Saudi side. If the US and the rest of the West were economically crippled sale of oil would plummet. What benefit would it be to the Saudi's to devastate those economies?
It would be penny wise pund foolish on the Saudi side. If the US and the rest of the West were economically crippled sale of oil would plummet. What benefit would it be to the Saudi's to devastate those economies? Originally Posted by discreetgentIf the Saudi's cut their supply in half and the price doubles, their revenue is the same. Why do they give a shit if they sell less, so long as the price goes up.
Let me try and explain it to you using small words.That was all you needed to say. I was reading the left scale as a simple increase in GDP. So the rest of what you said was kind of a waste of your time.
The line graph shows the capital gain tax receipts in each year as a percentage of GDP. Originally Posted by pjorourke
Your table doesn't take into account the fact that Janitor and the Guard are getting 6x the benefits per dollar put into SS. Do it on a net basis and you get a very different picture.
To me, a tax system that allows this to consistently happen, is indefensible and immoral. Originally Posted by TexTushHog