My incall situation

I would be stunned if the hook were able to keep this up for any length of time without ultimately becoming a possessive, exhausting, nagging girlfriend/wife type.

At this point, the victim is probably willing to pay the $1500 a week to make the hook go away.

Which is exactly what $200 an hour, pay-as-you-go hooks are best for.

No? Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

How long before u think that would happen?

Either way she was trying to take advantage. Some girls need to remember that desperation is not a good look. Originally Posted by bustybabygirl

Very true.... I always am hearing how girls are begging.. don't know if its true, but that's what I hear..

And in case anyone doesn't already know this, the only reason I am able to get the attention I do as both an escort and a sugar baby is because I am in the BDSM lifestyle. Good subs are hard to come by. If I was just another vanilla girl I probably wouldn't make enough to make it worth it. Doms pay the premium. Originally Posted by bustybabygirl

I'm not sure that's the only reason u get attention, u seem like a nice girl and pics are also very nice also...
But shit if that's such a great marketing tool, I need to be way more clear on how much I love a dom guy ; )

.

I'm not sure that's the only reason u get attention, u seem like a nice girl and pics are also very nice also... Originally Posted by KaylaRyder

Thanks babe :-)

Not much difference to me. Both are basically escorts. They just employ a different strategy. Originally Posted by cowboy8055

I'm not into the sugar thing.
BUT
A true sugar baby is only seeing her sugar daddy, as in one daddy
a hooker or the nice terms provider/escort see's many, and may even have a SO
so both are whores
but not the same type of deal

Any gal that
has more than one sugar daddy
sugar baby part time, hooker part time
is a whore fooling herself that she is not a hooker or whore
and is not a sugar baby

There are two types of sugar daddy's
1)The true use of the term sugar daddy does not share his toys and has a sugar baby.
2)The kinda miss use of the term sugar daddy is a guy that helps a hooker/s with cash. That cash is sugar, ...

Many sugar baby's make for bad hookers.(GPS in a way. And hates being a hooker)
Most hookers make a bad sugar baby( Will cheat and see john's she likes, or will see any john as a hooker)

examples of the miss use of of the term sugar daddy that I know without naming

one very old hooker I know(never had bcd myself with) has many mmmmm sugar clients(as daddy is not right use of term). The clients where long term repeaters even in old age. Paid her bills for her. Problem, The clients died off. No more sugar or sex for her. This hooker could have made a good sugar baby, key words "could have"

A older hooker I know of, "If a client want's to be my sugar daddy, its my job to suck as much cash and things off of him till he cooked or just explodes with anger. Making for a messy ending. Cheating/ed on him with clients she likes/liked every time she/they could.MMMM thinking I know of two LOL. Anyways in this example/s. Made for fun repeating with I hear, but not a good sugar baby at all. Did not want to be a kept woman, but gladly will suck you dry.

what was the topic again,
oh ya, incall situation
so this could be on topic

girl, just sucker a john or daddy ta pay of a great incall till the explosion is over.

btw: I am not a sugar daddy, custodian daddy fits my "odd jobs" bit kinda LOL

cus·to·di·an
kəsˈtōdēən/
noun
noun: custodian; plural noun: custodians

1. a person who has responsibility for or looks after something.
   "the custodians of pension and insurance funds"
   synonyms:keeper, guardian, steward, protector "the custodian of the relic"
   • US
     a person employed to clean and maintain a building.
     synonyms:caretaker, janitor, superintendent; informalsuper
     "the school custodian
   
   
   
   

How long before u think that would happen? Originally Posted by KaylaRyder

I'm sure there's more than one answer to this. I'm imagining in depends upon the personal circumstances that the hook finds herself faced with.

I just got done severing myself from a nightmare scenario a week ago. The most pressing aggravating circumstance with this hook was that she was married to what she claimed to be an abusive monster husband, and she had three kids. The hook could barely survive on the crumbs she made at work (she was a registered nurse) and had become relatively dependent on the income she was squeezing out of me, her primary victim. The funny thing is this hook claimed I was her only customer, most likely (I would say 100%) in an effort to make me feel "special". Yes, there was bareback fucking going on, with abandon.

This situation/nightmare went on for the last 5 months. I was eating it up, with a spoon, for about 3.5 months. Then it became an exhausting burden.

I'm sure it could take more, or less, time, depending upon circumstances?

Start a long thread about yourself? It'll be easy to locate for those interested

geeeshus keerist on a jimmie cracker


I been known to hijack a thrAD two , or three

but these people make me look like a piker!!!

ill know where to look the next time I receive "hijack" points

or anyone else.... STORE this thrAD for future refrence








thanks blueeyed beauty you come off as very relaxed!!


and not feeling the need to turn every last thrAD about yourself

It's pretty bad, ain't it.

It's pretty bad, ain't it. Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

You can't say it's pretty bad when you prompted a large portion of these posts by posing questions. Don't ask a question then make a big deal when someone answers it.

Saying I prompted it is an understatement.

Actually I'm having a good time. Not sure why derailing an informational thread like this one started out to be is even against the rules.

Is it against the rules?

I would think punishable derailing would occur if a reasonable dialogue were going on and someone came in and deliberately tried to change the topic to destroy the rhythm of the interplay.

This started out as a statement of fact that probably wasn't intended to spark debate. No?

Is it against the rules?

I would think punishable derailing would occur if a reasonable dialogue were going on and someone came in and deliberately tried to change the topic to destroy the rhythm of the interplay.

This started out as a statement of fact that probably wasn't intended to spark debate. No? Originally Posted by Next Best Thing

I think it is a rule but I so agree with you..

Correct again KayKay...as per usual?

Oh yes...oh yes you are