hell son, I read the entire article. It all boils down to exactly what you point out... small arms"if they violate arms embargoes or if they promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes."
did you read the part that says
"if they violate arms embargoes or if they promote acts of genocide, crimes against humanity or war crimes."
so you're telling me you're worried they'll come get your AK ?
good to know.
an aside,
the reason I voted for Obama the last election was because Romney placed a ban on automatic weapons when he was a Governor... trouncing all over the 2nd amendment then run for President worries me FAAAAAARRRR more than an international ban that goes after the aforementioned groups of thug bastards ... Originally Posted by CJ7
Well what happens if they do violate any of the above? I can't find that in this treaty anywhere? Sure it draws a red line, but it's the same as Asaad calling out Obama when he popped off at the mouth about chemical weapons. Ohhh wait, I bet the consequence is we are going to talk about it...Geez, it's so futile I feel it's a waste of time to even respond but hell I'm bored, apparently.
But I agree with Romney on that front, but mostly he was just too fucking weird to vote for.