Yeah but that was hollywood. Like today, the average woman has some cushion. It's oh so good for the pushin'
Originally Posted by grean
And these Kardashians aren’t Hollywood? Only in the sense that they have no real talent.
The bigger question is WHY NOT? There are few things more magical than a big, soft, round bubble that jiggles when pulling her back and forth on the pole...especially if she works and shakes it right before the finish.
But I’ve got a healthy fascination with curves in general - boobs gets the same attention. Thick, creamy thighs, ample up top, and plenty of cushion around back for the win.
Across history, women were worshipped for their curves (look at any celebrated artist’s work from the Renaissance period for proof). As men, we’re programmed to react. Social media and the prominence of porn has just magnified it all. Nothing much has changed.
Even the fake stuff, while not my fave, is sexy - and women know it. That’s why they do it - because it sells to men (and to “impress” other women). Pouty lips, asses that don’t match legs, small waists, etc etc.
Originally Posted by TristanThick
But if all that is as universal and as true as you say, why are there no (or certainly very few) women in the 1960’s and 1970’s held up as sexy with fat asses? Something changed with men’s tastes. And it may be that because of those tastes, women like these Kardashians are now popular, but they didn’t cause the change. That’s circular reasoning. People like fat asses because of the Kardashians. And people like the Kardashians because fat asses are popular. What caused the change?