House Republican popped with "Forbidden Topic"

Poor IB. I know, I should have kept my post to no more than 3 lines and no words longer than 2 syllables. Attention span and reading comprehension are not your strong points.

But really, "Blah, blah, blah"???? I thought even you could do better than that. Looks like I over estimated you (and trust me, as low as I set the bar, that is quite an accomplishment on your part). Originally Posted by Old-T

When are you going to answer the question, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man', "Did you suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, or are you letting your teeth rot, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'?"

Do you really want to go there? You have many very simple questions put in front of you that you have ignored for years. Why don't you answer them and then come back and I'll answer this one.

You can start with one that could be as old as two years or so: you claimed I was racist so I asked you what race I was. I'm still waiting for an answer, IBBigot.

Do you really want to go there? You have many very simple questions put in front of you that you have ignored for years. Why don't you answer them and then come back and I'll answer this one.

You can start with one that could be as old as two years or so: you claimed I was racist so I asked you what race I was. I'm still waiting for an answer, IBBigot. Originally Posted by Old-T

It really is a simple question, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man', "Did you suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, or are you letting your teeth rot, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'?"

I'm not one to cut in line. You were there first, so I will patiently wait my turn to answer after you do. Care for me to repeat the question?

Typical IBIdiot dodgeball game. He won't answer any question. But as a result of your asking will spin off into space screaming, frothing and spewing his effluence everywhere for all to see.

It is his way. The way of the wuss.

I'm not one to cut in line. You were there first, so I will patiently wait my turn to answer after you do. Care for me to repeat the question? Originally Posted by Old-T

You're just too ashamed to admit that you did suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'.

BINGO! Took him one minute. Did he answer your question, Old-T? Nope.

Did he behave as predicted? YEP!

You're just too ashamed to admit that you did suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Nope. No shame in my household this morning! Sorry to disappoint you. What in the world to you think I have to be ashamed of?

Nope. No shame in my household this morning! Sorry to disappoint you. What in the world to you think I have to be ashamed of? Originally Posted by Old-T

You must be too ashamed, or you'd admit that you did suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'.

You must be too ashamed, or you'd admit that you did suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Again, another question in a long line you refuse to answer. What do you think I should be ashamed of? What race do you think I am? Why do you support freeloading on the government by not paying taxes? What was your inspiration for your CondomMan and GayDevilWithBlowupDoll avatars? I could go on, but since you won't answer these few, why should I point out others you have not answered (and are too cowardly to answer)?

Poor one-note IBProphylacticMan. You are so easily twisted into a death spiral of repetitious stupid posts. Even when I don't try it often happens by accident, but that is because I just don't understand the workings of simple single celled organisms.

Again, another question in a long line you refuse to answer. What do you think I should be ashamed of? What race do you think I am? Why do you support freeloading on the government by not paying taxes? What was your inspiration for your CondomMan and GayDevilWithBlowupDoll avatars? I could go on, but since you won't answer these few, why should I point out others you have not answered (and are too cowardly to answer)?

Poor one-note IBProphylacticMan. You are so easily twisted into a death spiral of repetitious stupid posts. Even when I don't try it often happens by accident, but that is because I just don't understand the workings of simple single celled organisms. Originally Posted by Old-T

So you are admitting that you did suck on your 'prophylactic' this morning, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man'. Okay, Old-Twerp: the 'Prophylactic Man' did suck on his 'prophylactic' this morning.

I'm not sure what your point is tiny Tim, we conservatives would like people like this to resign. We don't defend them though we might compare them to another democrat with the same problem being defended by the dems. It was the GOP that got Nixon to resign, while the dems defended Clinton. It was the GOP that recommended that Mark Foley resign but the dems covered Barney Franks ample ass. Murder suspect Gary Condit was protected by the dems but corruption suspect Ted Stevens was forced to step aside. Later Condit was exonerated and so was Stevens.

Dems always protect their criminals and losers, the GOP forces them out.

There you go JDIdiot, speaking for "we conservatives."

maybe you should have a show on Fox.

Chit, maybe you already do!