A Democratic "All-in" Texas Strategy.. Why Not ?

Bullshit! It would be your ilk that repeats the same damn, meaningless lies in this forum on a daily basis. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Bullshit! It would be you who repeats the same damn, meaningless lies in the forum over and over and over and over and over.

How do you even know CT HAS an ilk?

Aw, you might as well put IB, Lusty and Waco too. They’ve all exposed your lies. You’re reduced to insults and putting people on ignore. Pathetic Originally Posted by bambino

we made the honor roll!


yippee!

Bullshit! It would be you who repeats the same damn, meaningless lies in the forum over and over and over and over and over.

How do you even know CT HAS an ilk? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

No. It's quite obvious who the liars are. The liars are the factually challenged lib-retards who refuse to accept the fact that hildebeest was a POS candidate in 2016 and blamed her loss on everything except the fact that hildebeest was a POS.

It’s where he likes to be. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I don’t give a rats ass what Chung does. He’s proved himself to be a fraud and a liar. But I do prefer the forum when you’re banned. So does everyone else.

No. It's quite obvious who the liars are. The liars are the factually challenged lib-retards who refuse to accept the fact that hildebeest was a POS candidate in 2016 and blamed her loss on everything except the fact that hildebeest was a POS. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

that would not be me.. I voted against Hildebeest, and am the first to say she was a very flawed candidate.

How do you even know CT HAS an ilk? Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

I hope I don't.. not sure what that is.. can it be treated with Witch Hazel?

No. It's quite obvious who the liars are. The liars are the factually challenged lib-retards who refuse to accept the fact that hildebeest was a POS candidate in 2016 and blamed her loss on everything except the fact that hildebeest was a POS. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

We had two crappy candidates in 2016....2019-20 will just have one

We had two crappy candidates in 2016....2019-20 will just have one


Originally Posted by matchingmole

And the dim-retards have yet to tell America which of their crappy candidates that will be.

And the dim-retards have yet to tell America which of their crappy candidates that will be. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

the Dems don't tell anyone.. they have a primary system that allows Voters to choose who they want to see as the Candidate. unlike the Republicans, who have a Ruler that will skip the California Primary, instead of allowing a peek at his tax returns, the ones he said he would hand over voluntarily some 2 years ago.

We know the one on the right is running.The last of the shite class of 2016

the Dems don't tell anyone.. they have a primary system that allows Voters to choose who they want to see as the Candidate. unlike the Republicans, who have a Ruler that will skip the California Primary, instead of allowing a peek at his tax returns, the ones he said he would hand over voluntarily some 2 years ago. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Tell that to Bernie after the 2016 race where the dim-retards had pre-selected their candidate ten ways to Sunday.

Bernie vs Trump would have been a fun match up...too old duffers shaking their fists at each other...in between sips of Ovaltine (banned in Denmark)

why do you spell my name wrong? do you not see how childish that is?

I know (everyone does) that Texas has been Red for a long time. but things change.

the Media will continue to vilify in 2020, so why are you sure Texas stays Red? Texas ushered in some Democrats in 2016, more than was seen in many years. all the major cities are run by Democrats, save Fort Worth, which is not exactly republican either. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Certainly things change. But should Texas become a Liberal state just for the sake of change? What would be the value of Texas turning Blue?

Tell that to Bernie after the 2016 race where the dim-retards had pre-selected their candidate ten ways to Sunday. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

well fuck, I B.. that is the most salient point you have made since my acquaintance with you on this Forum. nice job. I'm not Bullshitting in the slightest.

if Bambino and BB1961 had not purposely and deliberately represented themselves as trolling Clowns, I would have more guys on the right to engage. the incessant child-like stupidity from them, made it difficult to take others seriously, including yourself. but you are spot on here. I hope to see more like this, and fewer "you left-wing shit head" type posts.

good job. sincerely.. the Democratic establishment stole Bernie's candidacy.. he might not have won the nomination anyway, but you are right, he NEVER had a chance.

Certainly things change. But should Texas become a Liberal state just for the sake of change? What would be the value of Texas turning Blue? Originally Posted by Levianon17

no, the Voters should decide what Government they desire. I don't know if there would be value or not.

I stand by my prediction in Texas. Even Harry Reid disapproves of the far left agenda. Originally Posted by bambino

Harry Reid disapproves....so what.

As I lifelong Texan, I disapprove of the bullshit being implemented down on the border. That fat lying bastard is building concentration camps and I’m not the least bit ok with that. That squatter in the Oval Office best get a leash on his piss boy Miller.