I've already mentioned my preference in economic systems. Why don't you tell us yours?? And answer my questions.
Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN
Never asked you what your preference was. I asked you, very clearly, to name an economic system that doesn't rely on the existence of poor people - where you and Rush don't benefit off the backs of those poor people...that you and Rush constantly ridicule.
So preference, schmeference. You've had how many days to come up with one?
When you're able to do so, then i'll answer your questions. Because until then, your questions are nothing but an attempt to dodge the issue that you yourself brought up when you claimed that Rush was right when he said:
""Democrats need a permanent underclass...they need a certain level of poverty; they need a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people to vote for them, that's their base."
I'm claiming that "...a permanent underclass...a certain level of poverty, a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people..." is inevitable
because of, not in spite of, the economic system that you and Rushbo benefit from and champion.
You seem to be having a difficult time of, not only
proving me wrong, but simply just
claiming i'm wrong.