Would you see a provider that offers BBFS?

No matter how you slice it. . .BBFS is a no. Even on CB's refocus of the OP's question. . .not only am I not having sex with her even with tertiary precautions. . .I am not going to reward or wink at her behavior with others by giving her income.

People that engage in BBFS should be shun from our community.

I am not going to reward or wink at her behavior with others by giving her income.

People that engage in BBFS should be shun from our community. Originally Posted by ANONONE

You are clearly entitled to your opinions, and as such should only give income to those of your choosing.

However, to shun someone from "our" community is not simply extreme, it is insanely judgmental.

OUR little community is on the outer edges of what the rest of society deems appropriate. WE go outside the acceptable behaviors and typically do it privately and covertly.

However, WE should be the last group on the planet to be dictating what activities or behaviors are permitted in this Group, or to be discussed (within the limits of the Rules of the Owners)

I am not interested in engaging in BBFS nor am I interested in a number of other activities which are posted in reviews - but I can't see myself suggesting someone who sees a SW or a TransGendered provider OR a number of other activities which I believe have a high degree of risk should be banned from out community.

You are clearly entitled to your opinions, and as such should only give income to those of your choosing.

However, to shun someone from "our" community is not simply extreme, it is insanely judgmental.

OUR little community is on the outer edges of what the rest of society deems appropriate. WE go outside the acceptable behaviors and typically do it privately and covertly.

However, WE should be the last group on the planet to be dictating what activities or behaviors are permitted in this Group, or to be discussed (within the limits of the Rules of the Owners)

I am not interested in engaging in BBFS nor am I interested in a number of other activities which are posted in reviews - but I can't see myself suggesting someone who sees a SW or a TransGendered provider OR a number of other activities which I believe have a high degree of risk should be banned from out community. Originally Posted by CivilBarrister

Nope, CB. BBFS is not something to be taken lightly. Shunning is the best I have to offer--I would prefer stoning, but know it would not be popular.

If you engage in BBFS in our community you take risk with all of our lives, not just yours. Shunning is not too drastic.

Nope, CB. BBFS is not something to be taken lightly. Shunning is the best I have to offer--I would prefer stoning, but know it would not be popular.

If you engage in BBFS in our community you take risk with all of our lives, not just yours. Shunning is not too drastic. Originally Posted by ANONONE

How's the view from that high-horse? You're not honestly expecting us to believe that you have never, ever gone BB with a lady, are you? Not with a girlfriend or wife or mistress?

I think THAT was CB's point. If you're only ever going to see providers that only ever have protected sex, EVEN with SOs, then you're probably still waiting to book that first appointment. Either that or you're delusional. Providers are allowed to have lives outside the hobby, and its safe to assume that at least some of them are having unprotected sex with their SOs.

Nope, CB. BBFS is not something to be taken lightly. Shunning is the best I have to offer--I would prefer stoning, but know it would not be popular.

If you engage in BBFS in our community you take risk with all of our lives, not just yours. Shunning is not too drastic. Originally Posted by ANONONE

You make me laugh. Talk about being 'over the top'.

Shun. Give me a break.



Maybe our scarlet letter can say 'BBFS' instead of 'A'.

Like I said, I would prefer stoning. Call it self-defense. If you did something else near me that endangered my life, I would not think twice about hitting you over the head with a very large boulder if it made you stop.

Like I said, I would prefer stoning. Call it self-defense. If you did something else near me that endangered my life, I would not think twice about hitting you over the head with a very large boulder if it made you stop. Originally Posted by ANONONE

The nicest thing I can say about you is that you have issues.

The nicest thing I can say about you is that you have issues. Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

Sure. . .

What's next. . .a discussion of the merits of child pornography and teen prostitution in the name of tolerance?

Even deviants (proud to be one myself) have to draw a line somewhere. Mine is at sport sex where you get off risking your life (and our lives) through unprotected vaginal and anal sex with multiple partners.

Where's your line?

Sure. . .

What's next. . .a discussion of the merits of child pornography and teen prostitution in the name of tolerance?

Even deviants (proud to be one myself) have to draw a line somewhere. Mine is at sport sex where you get off risking your life (and our lives) through unprotected vaginal and anal sex with multiple partners.

Where's your line? Originally Posted by ANONONE

Sooo... the providers you see went into business right after they left the Convent did they....

Where's your line? Originally Posted by ANONONE

My line is that I am mature enough to know BBFS does exist. Like it or not, it is out there. I have stated many times before and will state it again......my safety is up to me, not the provider. If I f**k up, it is on me, and there is nobody else to blame but me, it's called taking responsibility.

I have seen several polls on ASPD Houston, and another on a Costa Rica website, and the poll was something like, 'have you ever had sex, with intent with a person in the sex business.....dancer, provider, etc.' With intent means that a condom was never put on. On every poll, the guys who voted yes was around 40-45%.

So you go warm your pitching arm up, then gather some good throwing stones..........but, where will you start?

Sooo... the providers you see went into business right after they left the Convent did they.... Originally Posted by ThatManFromTexas

Of course not. . .I just hope they don't have risk addiction to the point they no longer care about their well-being, or ours.

I am really concerned that all these folks talking about SO sex and other "what ifs" making protected sex a moot point, are really just looking for loopholes to justify their reckless actions.

My line is that I am mature enough to know BBFS does exist. Like it or not, it is out there. I have stated many times before and will state it again......my safety is up to me, not the provider. If I f**k up, it is on me, and there is nobody else to blame but me, it's called taking responsibility.

I have seen several polls on ASPD Houston, and another on a Costa Rica website, and the poll was something like, 'have you ever had sex, with intent with a person in the sex business.....dancer, provider, etc.' With intent means that a condom was never put on. On every poll, the guys who voted yes was around 40-45%.

So you go warm your pitching arm up, then gather some good throwing stones..........but, where will you start? Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

So then why are you winking at one of the most dangerous activities in the hobby? Do you engage in unprotected vaginal and anal sex with the providers we all share? Are you looking for somebody to agree with you? You seem to be attempting to justify this activity with an amount of vehemence that is disturbing.

So you go warm your pitching arm up, then gather some good throwing stones..........but, where will you start? Originally Posted by DEAR_JOHN

I would hope he would start with himself - I suspect, like Enddie stated, our self-proclaimed Grand PooBah probably had unprotected sex at least once in his life -


BTW I am not supporting BBFS - and clearly neither is Dear_John -

But we are also not supporting stoning people who engage in activities which we consider dangerous.....
I guess if that were the case, I would have to take my AK-47 and shoot every MOFO who comes out of a bar and gets behind the wheel of a car - Cause that behavior could certainly harm me as well.

So then why are you winking at one of the most dangerous activities in the hobby? Do you engage in unprotected vaginal and anal sex with the providers we all share? Are you looking for somebody to agree with you? You seem to be attempting to justify this activity with an amount of vehemence that is disturbing. Originally Posted by ANONONE

Can't you fucking read? I'm not trying to justify shit, just saying it happens. What part of "my safety is up to me, not the provider" don't you understand?

Go take you nightly dosage of lithium, things will get better tomorrow.

Of course not. . .I just hope they don't have risk addiction to the point they no longer care about their well-being, or ours.

I am really concerned that all these folks talking about SO sex and other "what ifs" making protected sex a moot point, are really just looking for loopholes to justify there reckless actions. Originally Posted by ANONONE

I don't think any guy on this board said that because some provider was bb'ing her husband ... that he would have bb sex with her. The general consensus was , practice safe sex, but be aware that many providers are bb'ing someone. I gotta say though... it seems a bit over the top to stone her for that.

I'm just sayin'...

Like my daddy told me and like I told my son when he became of age ... "Son it took you 18 years to grow that thang... be careful where you put it... and always... always... wrap that rascal..."