Who is responsible for two officers being shot?

Still STALKING ...are you?. Originally Posted by LexusLover

LLIdiot's still responding to my posts.....isn't he?

Was he lying a few posts earlier when he clearly stated I was not "worth the time?"

Or was he lying later when he clearly indicated I was "worth the time?"

LLIdiot, you cant have it both ways!

Was I "worth the time" or not?

I'm a conservative, I don't have a party in either the democrats or republicans. What is "my party's" political agenda?

Yeah you're a conservative, that means your party is republican. Just like you're assuming my party is democrat because I'm a liberal. Its also obvious in the way you keep senselessly drumming on and on in these forums and licking your butt boys asses. You can try to deny it, but its as fucking obvious as the fact that you are stupid.

A drug deal gone bad is not exactly a squabble. It is a crime and depending on the amount it either a felony or misdemeanor. I really have no idea where you come with the death punishment thing. Do you?

*sigh* you really do know how to deflect, I'll give you that.
Your stupid argument was in response to a claim about guns I made in my original comment. You claimed "According to the FBI, most killings are the result of a criminal act and not because of a "petty squabble" blah blah blah". Its fucking obvious where "death punishment thing" comes from, innit? What you're saying is, just because the majority of gun related deaths happen due to criminal acts, it means that most/all of the deceased were criminals and deserved to die (i'd love to see you squirm away from this). If that wasn't your argument, why'd you bring up that stupid statistic in the first place?



You're a liberal plain and simple. Are you a socialist? That remains to be seen. Now you advance a religious argument???? Wow! Satan? Do you even know where the term's right wing and left wing come from? As for those basic fucking rights, they have them and have for some time. We have people who want more and that is the problem. The democrats are willing to sell their souls (ooooo, a religious reference) for the votes.[/SIZE]
Hey JDIdiot, ever heard of an allegory? that's exactly what this was. It obviously flew straight over your head. You are proving how correct I was in assuming you a DOLT. I DID NOT bring religion into this, religion has nothing to do with this and is a way for you to deflect the argument (once again). All that you just said is basically your opinion and has no weight in reality. If you think that the country is on even footing in terms of race relations, then you are really fucking clueless and I bet you have never stepped outside the trailer trash neighborhood you live in.



[/COLOR] No, I only spent about four or five months in England some years ago. I'm not a limey, my mother's family got out in 1775. Of course, you missed the salient point; you shoot a cop in this country and you claim racism and get off with a few years. You punch a cop in England and you go down hard. Huge difference that maybe you're not so sure of. Say something British for us. My home is a three bedroom house by the way with a full basement and I don't want the government to raise taxes on anyone because they just waste the money.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

Again, that's you making up bullshit that you know nothing about. UK has courts, lawyers and due process just like we do. Many things come into play, and it's not black and white as you make it seem. Sure, in America, our legal process is messed up and many people get off when they shouldn't. But that's exactly how it is in the UK. You have to PROVE guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Try going out and punching a cop, see what happens. You've just been found guilty of being stupid once again.

My home is a three bedroom house by the way with a full basement

There's no reason to brag on here. Its a hooker forum. I could as easily claim that you live in a 1 bedroom trailer out on pigsty boulevard. Considering your obvious lack of education and myopic views, I have a feeling I'd be much closer to the truth.



One final note; if you are truly English.

I never said I was English. Living in England and being English are two vastly different things.

I'm a conservative, I don't have a party in either the democrats or republicans. What is "my party's" political agenda?

Yeah you're a conservative, that means your party is republican. Just like you're assuming my party is democrat because I'm a liberal. Its also obvious in the way you keep senselessly drumming on and on in these forums and licking your butt boys asses. You can try to deny it, but its as fucking obvious as the fact that you are stupid.

This is what I mean by half ass backwards. The party that I usually end up voting for is the GOP because they are the only ones, since the 1980s, who put up conservative candidates. The democratic party only fields liberals, or worse, now.

A drug deal gone bad is not exactly a squabble. It is a crime and depending on the amount it either a felony or misdemeanor. I really have no idea where you come with the death punishment thing. Do you?

*sigh* you really do know how to deflect, I'll give you that.
Your stupid argument was in response to a claim about guns I made in my original comment. You claimed "According to the FBI, most killings are the result of a criminal act and not because of a "petty squabble" blah blah blah". Its fucking obvious where "death punishment thing" comes from, innit? What you're saying is, just because the majority of gun related deaths happen due to criminal acts, it means that most/all of the deceased were criminals and deserved to die (i'd love to see you squirm away from this). If that wasn't your argument, why'd you bring up that stupid statistic in the first place?

I made no moral judgement ("deserved to die") other than criminals are criminals. You've taken the leftie way again and ignore all the other "gun related" (your words) causes of death. The FBI likes to break this stuff down into things like accidents, suicides, misidentification (as opposed to accident), and in the COMMISSION OF A CRIME. This last is what I have been talking about since the beginning of this conversation but maybe you haven't caught on yet.



You're a liberal plain and simple. Are you a socialist? That remains to be seen. Now you advance a religious argument???? Wow! Satan? Do you even know where the term's right wing and left wing come from? As for those basic fucking rights, they have them and have for some time. We have people who want more and that is the problem. The democrats are willing to sell their souls (ooooo, a religious reference) for the votes.[/SIZE]
Hey JDIdiot, ever heard of an allegory? that's exactly what this was. It obviously flew straight over your head. You are proving how correct I was in assuming you a DOLT. I DID NOT bring religion into this, religion has nothing to do with this and is a way for you to deflect the argument (once again). All that you just said is basically your opinion and has no weight in reality. If you think that the country is on even footing in terms of race relations, then you are really fucking clueless and I bet you have never stepped outside the trailer trash neighborhood you live in.

And again you make judgement about how or where I live that runs counter to the liberal/democratic mantra. Those "poor" that the democrats are so proud of live in trailer parks, ghettos, and in their cars. And you did bring religion into it. Sorry to burst your bubble or repeat back what you're saying.



[/COLOR] No, I only spent about four or five months in England some years ago. I'm not a limey, my mother's family got out in 1775. Of course, you missed the salient point; you shoot a cop in this country and you claim racism and get off with a few years. You punch a cop in England and you go down hard. Huge difference that maybe you're not so sure of. Say something British for us. My home is a three bedroom house by the way with a full basement and I don't want the government to raise taxes on anyone because they just waste the money.[/SIZE][/QUOTE]

Again, that's you making up bullshit that you know nothing about. UK has courts, lawyers and due process just like we do. Many things come into play, and it's not black and white as you make it seem. Sure, in America, our legal process is messed up and many people get off when they shouldn't. But that's exactly how it is in the UK. You have to PROVE guilty beyond reasonable doubt. Try going out and punching a cop, see what happens. You've just been found guilty of being stupid once again.

Your mouth keeps moving but nothing useful is coming out. In my navy days I spent a couple of weeks in Portsmouth, a couple of months in Chatham, a month in Rosythe, Scotland, and a couple of weeks in London (that's the capital of England). Tell me something that you really know. You're already admitted that I was right and you were wrong about some British policemen being armed. So you're down a couple of points now.

My home is a three bedroom house by the way with a full basement

There's no reason to brag on here. Its a hooker forum. I could as easily claim that you live in a 1 bedroom trailer out on pigsty boulevard. Considering your obvious lack of education and myopic views, I have a feeling I'd be much closer to the truth.

I guess you really are new here and not some made up alter ego of FuckZup. I have two BAs and a MA. That has been discussed many times on this forum but you weren't at the meetings.



One final note; if you are truly English.

I never said I was English. Living in England and being English are two vastly different things. Originally Posted by shanm

So when it comes to all things being English, I am your equal. That Marshal thing stumped you didn't it?

Your mouth keeps moving but nothing useful is coming out. In my navy days I spent a couple of weeks in Portsmouth, a couple of months in Chatham, a month in Rosythe, Scotland, and a couple of weeks in London (that's the capital of England). Tell me something that you really know. You're already admitted that I was right and you were wrong about some British policemen being armed. So you're down a couple of points now.

How exactly do you know my mouth is moving? I don't have to spell out what I'm writing dipshit. That's exclusive to retards like you. Saying that is also pretty fucking ballsy considering you have contributed absolutely nothing in the argument. "I lived there, I lived there..blah blah blah" Guess what? NO ONE gives a shit.
It's obvious that you had no idea what you were talking about when you said that some policeman "carry" guns. They don't "carry" guns idiot, they're called special firearms units, kind of like the SWAT teams we have here in the U.S. Then again, I have a feeling you've never been right on anything.

This is what I mean by half ass backwards. The party that I usually end up voting for is the GOP because they are the only ones, since the 1980s, who put up conservative candidates. The democratic party only fields liberals, or worse, now.

So you're saying that you vote for GOP candidates just because they are conservative. Got ya'.
But isn't that exactly what the FUCK I said to you in the beginning. Your allegiance is to the GOP because they are conservative, doesn't even matter if the GOP candidate is bigger dunce than yourself. My allegiance, however, is not to the democratic party because they are liberal. I've publicly stated before that I would vote for Ron Paul if he ever got the GOP nomination. Who's down some "points" now?



I made no moral judgement ("deserved to die") other than criminals are criminals. You've taken the leftie way again and ignore all the other "gun related" (your words) causes of death. The FBI likes to break this stuff down into things like accidents, suicides, misidentification (as opposed to accident), and in the COMMISSION OF A CRIME. This last is what I have been talking about since the beginning of this conversation but maybe you haven't caught on yet.

That's exactly what you did. You classified all crimes as equal to justify your gun rights. You implied that just because people who die from guns are involved in some criminal activity, they deserve to have been killed and the inclusion of a weapon is unimportant. That's real fucking peachy isn't it?Someone who gets shot in a marijuana deal would be classfied under "COMMISSION OF A CRIME", but that doesn't mean that he deserved to die. He died only because some criminals were in possession of a gun. Go watch the first 48, you'll see what I'm talking about.



And again you make judgement about how or where I live that runs counter to the liberal/democratic mantra. Those "poor" that the democrats are so proud of live in trailer parks, ghettos, and in their cars. And you did bring religion into it. Sorry to burst your bubble or repeat back what you're saying.

Blah Blah Blah, completely incoherent, completely irrelevant. Read that back to yourself and see if it makes any sense even to you.


I guess you really are new here and not some made up alter ego of FuckZup. I have two BAs and a MA. That has been discussed many times on this forum but you weren't at the meetings.

Who attended that meeting? LLIdiot and IB Moron?
I'll only judge you from what I've seen on here and let me tell ya, it's not looking good. You have two BA's and an MA yet you named yourself JD Barleycorn? seems like a bunch of horseshit. Or maybe you did really want to pretend to be a lawyer at first, and then you realized you couldn't carry an argument if your life depended on it. So you changed track and became an "intllektual" instead. That would be my guess.





So when it comes to all things being English, I am your equal. That Marshal thing stumped you didn't it?

^ again I have no clue what the fuck you are talking about.

JD claims to have all these degrees, claims to be a college professor and claims to have been in the Navy. But this is a hooker board and no way to prove any of it. And I doubt JD is stupid enough to out himself, unless his ego gets the best of him.

JD claims to have all these degrees, claims to be a college professor and claims to have been in the Navy. But this is a hooker board and no way to prove any of it. And I doubt JD is stupid enough to out himself, unless his ego gets the best of him. Originally Posted by cowboyinjungle

He's full of shit.

What is going on in this world? Killing of each other, political division like never before, ideologues' winning the people with their power point presentations! Everybody all up in arms with such emotional zeal, and you guys on this site thinking your any different! Look at the rant and raves in the political forum! It's either the same few spewing their never ending sophomoric chatter so nobody else can have an intelligent conversation! Symptomatic of how the world behaves today. Simply repeating the only things they know. Just what their team cheerleader tells them to say!This is the maturity level of our world today. So the rhetoric gets louder, the emotions grow, until the festering zit pops!
Who killed the cops? The same people who justify the killing of kids! The same ones that excuse one corrupt politician because he is "my guy"! The same people who can not and will not carry on a mature decent conversation! The only difference between the idiot who used the gun and the idiot who propagated the hate, and the sheep who simply mimic the words of their puppet master, and those who sit back and remain silent is: Nothing!
And the puppets will simply look on bewildered and claim "not me"

He's full of shit. Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

undercuntalinsky and jungleboy your campaign is failing...

The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign.

undercuntalinsky and jungleboy your campaign is failing...

The tenth rule: The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition. It is this unceasing pressure that results in the reactions from the opposition that are essential for the success of the campaign. Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You can quit with the Alinsky quotes. He was a dumbass. And his book was a piece of shit.

Your mouth keeps moving but nothing useful is coming out. In my navy days I spent a couple of weeks in Portsmouth, a couple of months in Chatham, a month in Rosythe, Scotland, and a couple of weeks in London (that's the capital of England). Tell me something that you really know. You're already admitted that I was right and you were wrong about some British policemen being armed. So you're down a couple of points now.

How exactly do you know my mouth is moving? I don't have to spell out what I'm writing dipshit. That's exclusive to retards like you. Saying that is also pretty fucking ballsy considering you have contributed absolutely nothing in the argument. "I lived there, I lived there..blah blah blah" Guess what? NO ONE gives a shit.
It's obvious that you had no idea what you were talking about when you said that some policeman "carry" guns. They don't "carry" guns idiot, they're called special firearms units, kind of like the SWAT teams we have here in the U.S. Then again, I have a feeling you've never been right on anything.

(figured I would try green) This is getting monotonous but I never understood why bullies beat up on retarded kids. I'm tired of beating up on you. Still....

Talking, writing, writing your name in the snow, it is all about communications. First, you were the one who said you lived in England not me. I brought it up afterwards to show that you are not the only one to see England.

The police in England do carry guns. You've admitted this twice now. Why do you keep wanting to retract by deflecting what you said. I never said ALL police carry guns, nor did I hint or imply. I am correct as you have admitted, the police (some, not all) carry guns in England. So you were wrong. Accept it.

This is what I mean by half ass backwards. The party that I usually end up voting for is the GOP because they are the only ones, since the 1980s, who put up conservative candidates. The democratic party only fields liberals, or worse, now.

So you're saying that you vote for GOP candidates just because they are conservative. Got ya'.
But isn't that exactly what the FUCK I said to you in the beginning. Your allegiance is to the GOP because they are conservative, doesn't even matter if the GOP candidate is bigger dunce than yourself. My allegiance, however, is not to the democratic party because they are liberal. I've publicly stated before that I would vote for Ron Paul if he ever got the GOP nomination. Who's down some "points" now?

Don't misquote me again. I vote for the better of the many candidates and most of the time that means the conservative. Now that also means that since 1980 it has been pretty much GOP candidates since the Democrat party has run just about all the moderates and all of the conservatives out of their party or YOUR party. I voted for Hillary Clinton in the 2008 primaries because she was more competent than Obama. Not better, just more competent. Early I voted for democrat Pat Danner of Missouri's 6th congressional district. In 1980 I voted for Anderson over Reagan and Carter. We all make some mistakes but I try to correct them. I bet you voted for Obama twice.


I made no moral judgement ("deserved to die") other than criminals are criminals. You've taken the leftie way again and ignore all the other "gun related" (your words) causes of death. The FBI likes to break this stuff down into things like accidents, suicides, misidentification (as opposed to accident), and in the COMMISSION OF A CRIME. This last is what I have been talking about since the beginning of this conversation but maybe you haven't caught on yet.

That's exactly what you did. You classified all crimes as equal to justify your gun rights. You implied that just because people who die from guns are involved in some criminal activity, they deserve to have been killed and the inclusion of a weapon is unimportant. That's real fucking peachy isn't it?Someone who gets shot in a marijuana deal would be classfied under "COMMISSION OF A CRIME", but that doesn't mean that he deserved to die. He died only because some criminals were in possession of a gun. Go watch the first 48, you'll see what I'm talking about.

You keep going back to that marijuana deal. Any reason for that? I don't have to justify my gun "rights". Just the fact that even you call them "rights" says I win that argument. We are talking about self defense but you're talking about crime. Different thing entirely. You mention that someone died but you never said who that was. He probably died because of shot grouping. Most people who get shot....survive.



And again you make judgement about how or where I live that runs counter to the liberal/democratic mantra. Those "poor" that the democrats are so proud of live in trailer parks, ghettos, and in their cars. And you did bring religion into it. Sorry to burst your bubble or repeat back what you're saying.

Blah Blah Blah, completely incoherent, completely irrelevant. Read that back to yourself and see if it makes any sense even to you.

Once again, you brought it up. So take it in your mouth and enjoy everything you get.


I guess you really are new here and not some made up alter ego of FuckZup. I have two BAs and a MA. That has been discussed many times on this forum but you weren't at the meetings.

Who attended that meeting? LLIdiot and IB Moron?
I'll only judge you from what I've seen on here and let me tell ya, it's not looking good. You have two BA's and an MA yet you named yourself JD Barleycorn? seems like a bunch of horseshit. Or maybe you did really want to pretend to be a lawyer at first, and then you realized you couldn't carry an argument if your life depended on it. So you changed track and became an "intllektual" instead. That would be my guess.

Whoever said that I want to be a lawyer? Lying again? I would never consider myself an intellectual and I have never called myself one. I have too much common sense. I do call myself a history major which I think is pretty important.





So when it comes to all things being English, I am your equal. That Marshal thing stumped you didn't it?

^ again I have no clue what the fuck you are talking about. Originally Posted by shanm

The fact that you admit you don't know what I'm talking about when it comes to "Marshal" indicates that you aren't much of an expert on England. Kind of like not knowing who Paul Revere is....you do know who Paul Revere is don't you?

JD claims to have all these degrees, claims to be a college professor and claims to have been in the Navy. But this is a hooker board and no way to prove any of it. And I doubt JD is stupid enough to out himself, unless his ego gets the best of him. Originally Posted by cowboyinjungle

Three is not a lot of degrees (do you think it is?). Every Phd has three degrees at least. Many have four. I know of one person who claims seven and he has the paperwork on the wall to prove it. I also do not use the word professor to describe myself. Leave that to the intellectuals. I'm just a teacher or educator if you want to be fancy.

Is that all it takes? Knowing Marshal and England are somehow related? Let me try... cameltoe and Australia. That mean anything to you?

Is that all it takes? Knowing Marshal and England are somehow related? Let me try... cameltoe and Australia. That mean anything to you? Originally Posted by UnderConstruction

I think any Englishman (which you implied that you were) knows the story of John Marshal.

Three is not a lot of degrees (do you think it is?). Every Phd has three degrees at least. Many have four. I know of one person who claims seven and he has the paperwork on the wall to prove it. I also do not use the word professor to describe myself. Leave that to the intellectuals. I'm just a teacher or educator if you want to be fancy. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Great. You're infecting impressionable minds. As for a PHD, it depends on the school and country. In England, your favorite place it seems, they only require an undergraduate degree in order to enter a PHD program. So that would be two degrees by the time you finish. Seven degrees? And I wonder who paid for all that.