The email contained no classified info genius. You can keep bleating about it but the fact of the matter is that the Central Intelligence Agency has made a determination that the man's name was not classified info. And, furthermore, the redaction was done to protect him personally. The argument that the CIA doesn't know what is classified and what isn't is absurd.
It's what they do. But, I guess you are an expert on that too? Just like your expertise in climatology, right?
You just keep patting yourself on the back about how smart you are, dumbass. The facts show otherwise.
>>>>The CIA has told Congress that the name of an alleged secret agency source, mentioned but then partially redacted by the U.S. State Department from an email received on Hillary Clinton's private server was not considered by the agency to be secret at all.
At issue is Moussa Koussa, a one-time intelligence chief for Libyan dictator Muammar Gaddafi, and the question of whether or not his name should have been treated as a secret in an email Clinton received four years ago from a close confidant.
Republicans, who are trying to show Clinton mishandled classified information while secretary of state, have argued that Koussa's name should not have been included in the email she got on her private server from Sidney Blumenthal.
But the CIA, weighing in after the Republicans made their accusation earlier this month, has told lawmakers that Koussa's name was not classified, according to correspondence between the spy agency and officials of the House of Representatives panel set up to investigate the Sept. 11, 2012 attacks on a U.S. diplomatic facility and nearby spy base in Benghazi, Libya.<<<<
http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/...0SE01O20151020
Trying to deflect to appear knowledgeable? Another failed attempt, pleb. Do you want to change what your butt buddy posted, now?
"the CIA doesn't regard the Blumenthal email as classified.".....
Do you see a lot of players on Sunday afternoon calling the games?
I'll repeat:
It's not the Agency's "call" as to whether a document is "classified" .or not... !!!
Your BOY IN THE WHITE signed the Executive Order!
If you had been able to EARN a doctorate, you could probably figure that out!
BTW: Here's what he said ..... and put that in the context of his most recent "announcement" on the topic:
"(tt) "Violation" means:
(1) any knowing, willful, or negligent action that could reasonably be expected to result in an unauthorized disclosure of classified information;
(2) any knowing, willful, or negligent action to classify or continue the classification of information contrary to the requirements of this order or its implementing directives; or
(3) any knowing, willful, or negligent action to create or continue a special access program contrary to the requirements of this order."
Originally Posted by LexusLover