Best interview on FOX

Barney and Chris aren't "distractions": they're dimotard accomplices (and let's not forget Larry Summers, oh no!). Goldman Sachs exploited the provisions of laws enacted by Carter and Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Slick Willie.....hmmm.......read the history of the legislation leading up to passage of the Commodities Futures Modernization Act signed by Slick and identify the primary proponents of the deregulation of the market. Hint...Phil Gramm. Also look at the intense pressure brought to bear on the SEC in 2004 when the largest financial firms literally became an unregulated global casino free from oversight to leverage their assets to a risk level that was unsustainable given any downward movement in the financial instruments they were promoting. Where did Phil's wife work before she joined the Board of Directors of ENRON?

Slick Willie.....hmmm.......read the history of the legislation leading up to passage of the Commodities Futures Modernization Act signed by Slick and identify the primary proponents of the deregulation of the market. Hint...Phil Gramm. Also look at the intense pressure brought to bear on the SEC in 2004 when the largest financial firms literally became an unregulated global casino free from oversight to leverage their assets to a risk level that was unsustainable given any downward movement in the financial instruments they were promoting. Where did Phil's wife work before she joined the Board of Directors of ENRON? Originally Posted by lostincypress

Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator -- with his dimotard Secretary of Treasury, Larry Summers, guiding hand -- signed the legislation into law.

Tell ya what, you come up with an economic and/or government system where people aren't, by design, poor (to your benefit, by the way), and we'll talk. Originally Posted by Doove

So tell us, are you poor?? If not, is it because of your own efforts?? Or, are you well connected?? Or, better yet, did you just get lucky and win life's lottery to get what you have and beat the system designed to keep you down??

You totally ignore the greed of borrowers who signed the loans and pledged to repay! Without these borrowers, the scheming by Wall Street goes nowhere. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

C'mon, Whirly, you know they were all tricked into lying about their income and signing for mortgages they couldn't afford without understanding the consequences. Have some compassion, how bout it!!??!!

.

.

So tell us, are you poor?? If not, is it because of your own efforts?? Or, are you well connected?? Or, better yet, did you just get lucky and win life's lottery to get what you have and beat the system designed to keep you down?? Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

Oh i see. Can't come up with an economic system that doesn't have you benefiting from poor people, so you change the subject.

Best interview on FOX ... Like saying
World's tallest midget!

Oh i see. Can't come up with an economic system that doesn't have you benefiting from poor people, so you change the subject. Originally Posted by Doove

I've already mentioned my preference in economic systems. Why don't you tell us yours?? And answer my questions.

While you're thinking of a typically less than witty comeback, why don't you think back and tell us how many poor people ever hired you?? Or, how many poor people ever loaned you money?? Or, invested in your business venture??

You must be exceedingly happy these days. With 9 million fewer jobs than 5 years ago and record numbers of people on the government teat, your support of O'Blunder and loathing of our country has finally been justified.

I've already mentioned my preference in economic systems. Why don't you tell us yours?? And answer my questions. Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

Never asked you what your preference was. I asked you, very clearly, to name an economic system that doesn't rely on the existence of poor people - where you and Rush don't benefit off the backs of those poor people...that you and Rush constantly ridicule.

So preference, schmeference. You've had how many days to come up with one?

When you're able to do so, then i'll answer your questions. Because until then, your questions are nothing but an attempt to dodge the issue that you yourself brought up when you claimed that Rush was right when he said:

""Democrats need a permanent underclass...they need a certain level of poverty; they need a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people to vote for them, that's their base."

I'm claiming that "...a permanent underclass...a certain level of poverty, a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people..." is inevitable because of, not in spite of, the economic system that you and Rushbo benefit from and champion.

You seem to be having a difficult time of, not only proving me wrong, but simply just claiming i'm wrong.

Best interview on FOX ... Like saying
World's tallest midget! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Why does Yssup Rider rub his eyes in the morning when he gets up?

Because he doesn't have any balls to scratch...amazing...LOL

Never asked you what your preference was. I asked you, very clearly, to name an economic system that doesn't rely on the existence of poor people - where you and Rush don't benefit off the backs of those poor people...that you and Rush constantly ridicule.

So preference, schmeference. You've had how many days to come up with one?

When you're able to do so, then i'll answer your questions. Because until then, your questions are nothing but an attempt to dodge the issue that you yourself brought up when you claimed that Rush was right when he said:

""Democrats need a permanent underclass...they need a certain level of poverty; they need a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people to vote for them, that's their base."

I'm claiming that "...a permanent underclass...a certain level of poverty, a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people..." is inevitable because of, not in spite of, the economic system that you and Rushbo benefit from and champion.

You seem to be having a difficult time of, not only proving me wrong, but simply just claiming i'm wrong. Originally Posted by Doove

""Democrats need a permanent underclass"...over and over, over and over, over and over, over and over, over and over, over and over, over and over, over and over....fucker

Never asked you what your preference was. I asked you, very clearly, to name an economic system that doesn't rely on the existence of poor people - where you and Rush don't benefit off the backs of those poor people...that you and Rush constantly ridicule.

So preference, schmeference. You've had how many days to come up with one?

When you're able to do so, then i'll answer your questions. Because until then, your questions are nothing but an attempt to dodge the issue that you yourself brought up when you claimed that Rush was right when he said:

""Democrats need a permanent underclass...they need a certain level of poverty; they need a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people to vote for them, that's their base."

I'm claiming that "...a permanent underclass...a certain level of poverty, a certain level of uneducated, unskilled people..." is inevitable because of, not in spite of, the economic system that you and Rushbo benefit from and champion.

You seem to be having a difficult time of, not only proving me wrong, but simply just claiming i'm wrong. Originally Posted by Doove

You can play your little middle school semantics games all you want, thus putting yourself squarely in the group that Rush talked about. I answered your question clearly in post #31 of this thread, now it's your turn. You know my position, what's yours??

You haven't added anything substantive to the discussion other than to deflect from backing up your idiotic, oxymoronic premise that our economy thrives on the backs of poor people. The only thing keeping poor people poor helps is government by increasing dependency. That's what your man O'Blunder is doing...how's the economy doing under his tutelage?? Try harder.

You can play your little middle school semantics games all you want, thus putting yourself squarely in the group that Rush talked about. Originally Posted by EXTXOILMAN

What the hell does that even mean?

I answered your question clearly in post #31 of this thread, now it's your turn. You know my position, what's yours??

You answered nothing. Oh, you tried, i'll give ya that, but you failed miserably.

Nevertheless, i'll answer. I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea of being a capitalist. Happy now?

You haven't added anything substantive to the discussion other than to deflect from backing up your idiotic, oxymoronic premise that our economy thrives on the backs of poor people.

That's because i'm waiting for you to offer something substantive. Until you do, you're making my job pretty damn easy.

The only thing keeping poor people poor helps is government by increasing dependency.

Uh huh. It's people like you who shop at Wal-Mart because it's cheap, then turn around and spit on the people whose lot in life makes it cheap.

People like you disgust me, quite frankly. Not that people like you care about being disgusting, but there ya have it.

That's what your man O'Blunder is doing...how's the economy doing under his tutelage??

Better than it was under the last 2 Republican Presidents, for what it's worth.

Try harder.

"Try harder" he says. The guy who can't come up with one single economic system that isn't designed to rely on large sections of society making minimum wage (or less) is telling me to "try harder".

What the hell does that even mean?



You answered nothing. Oh, you tried, i'll give ya that, but you failed miserably.

Nevertheless, i'll answer. I'm perfectly comfortable with the idea of being a capitalist. Happy now?



That's because i'm waiting for you to offer something substantive. Until you do, you're making my job pretty damn easy.



Uh huh. It's people like you who shop at Wal-Mart because it's cheap, then turn around and spit on the people whose lot in life makes it cheap.

People like you disgust me, quite frankly. Not that people like you care about being disgusting, but there ya have it.



Better than it was under the last 2 Republican Presidents, for what it's worth.



"Try harder" he says. The guy who can't come up with one single economic system that isn't designed to rely on large sections of society making minimum wage (or less) is telling me to "try harder". Originally Posted by Doove

Now that the victor has earned his crown, the vanquished crawls back to East Texas with his ass strapped to his back!