Why Hillary will obliterate Drumpf.

Just like OJ was innocent of all charges, right, speedy? Intelligent people understand setting up a server to avoid the requirements of the FOIA is a nefarious circumvention of public law, speedy. Intelligent people know that having classified material stored at home on an unsecured server is a violation of government rules and regulations, speedy. Intelligent people know that anyone arguing that Hildebeest didn't "knowingly send, receive and store" classified material on an unsecured server is an outright lie, speedy, since she, in fact, knowingly set up the server for nefarious reasons in the first place. Odumbo has already demonstrated that he picks and chooses which laws he will enforce, speedy; so, you can just keep your head up his ass until you drown on his shit.
Originally Posted by I B Hankering

When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.

That's it? That's all you got? No link (or even the most sketchy of details) to a statement that you claim was 100% false, but links to two episodes that you admit are LESS than 100% false?

It appears there was at least a mini-scandal about what the Clintons took (or tried to take) with them when they left the White House back in 2001, wasn't there?

And there surely exists an actual video interview where Hillary admitted in a laughing manner that she defended a child rapist and won, right?

Perhaps both stories were embellished and distorted somewhat by her political enemies, but there certainly appears to be enough factual substance there to make the average American recoil in disgust.

And of course, you don't even question the dozens of other serious allegations against her, except to say you don't want to talk about them unless she is found guilty of something.

And you pretend to be even-handed in evaluating Trump versus Hillary? Originally Posted by lustylad

You are free to interpret the links as you see fit. Yes, there was a "mini-scandal" as you put it. The Clintons were given gifts from others while in office. Some were personal gifts and some were gifts that were meant to stay in the White House after the Clintons left. The Clintons made restitution on everything in question. Case closed.

The second link is 40 years old. She got her client off, just as any lawyer would try to do. If she laughed about it, that would be somewhat reprehensible, depending on WHY she was laughing. The link opened with a lie and then became simply misleading.

What are the "dozens of serious allegations made against her"? I supplied one link in which the opinion of the writer was that no valid charges should be brought against Clinton for misuse of her server. There are other links that say she is guilty. Hopefully a court of law will determine her guilt or innocence. What dozens of others do you have?

When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Keep sucking (as in 'sucking chest wound'), speedy:

NBC

MAY 4 2016, 6:14 PM ET

Hacker 'Guccifer': I Got Inside Hildebeest's Server

Americans died and Hillary lied.

Do you have something that serious against Trump? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

I assume you mean Benghazi.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/tru...ns-3-a-m-call/

Keep sucking (as in 'sucking chest wound'), speedy: Originally Posted by I B Hankering

When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.

What part of that do you not understand? You just continue to justify my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.

I assume you mean Benghazi.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/tru...ns-3-a-m-call/ Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Here's your "fact check", speedy:

lie \ˈlī-iŋ\
intransitive verb

1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive

2 : to create a false or misleading impression

When Clinton is convicted of a crime regarding misuse of her server, you let me know. Until then, according to the U.S. justice system, she is innocent.

What part of that do you not understand? You just continue to justify my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits.

I assume you mean Benghazi.

http://www.factcheck.org/2016/04/tru...ns-3-a-m-call/ Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

here's an interesting line from that article ..


Clinton wrote (page 323) that her first action was to use a secure phone on her desk to contact the White House

so the stupid cunt can use a secure phone but not a secure email system? aahahahga

Is IBIDiot quoting the dictionary again?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASSSASAaa !

Here's your "fact check", speedy:

lie \ˈlī-iŋ\
intransitive verb

1 : to make an untrue statement with intent to deceive

2 : to create a false or misleading impression



You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

First, I'll match my IQ against your IQ any day of the year.

Second, please show me where I've said I am planning to vote for Clinton. You are an idiot because I've never said anything like that.

You don't believe anything I say and you don't believe anything anyone else says that differs with your "opinion". Which simply confirms my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.

Is IBIDiot quoting the dictionary again?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASSSASAaa ! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

The fool is totally clueless in life.

Is IBIDiot quoting the dictionary again?

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHASSSASAaa ! Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Because an ignorant jackass like you wouldn't know how to look up the words for yourself, you Mussulman-luvin, Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM.

First, I'll match my IQ against your IQ any day of the year. You've been found wanting on numerous previous occasions, speedy.


Second, please show me where I've said I am planning to vote for Clinton. You are an idiot because I've never said anything like that. It's obvious from your putrid defense of Hildebeest, speedy.

You don't believe anything I say and you don't believe anything anyone else says that differs with your "opinion". Which simply confirms my opinion that you are, by far, the dumbest person on this board.
You voted for Odumbo twice and you plan to vote for Hildebeest, speedy, that puts your IQ in the single digits.
Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

The fool is totally clueless in life. Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You'd be the one defending the dim-retard under criminal investigation by the FBI, speedy.

He's a whole bag of assholes.

You'd be the one defending the dim-retard under criminal investigation by the FBI, speedy.[/COLOR] Originally Posted by I B Hankering;1058100987

[COLOR="Black"

I defend the U.S. judicial system, not Clinton. Or Trump. Idiot.\

Again, please tell me where I've stated that I will vote for Clinton.

I defend the U.S. judicial system, not Clinton. Or Trump. Idiot.

Again, please tell me where I've stated that I will vote for Clinton.

Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

You've been defending Hildebeest all day long, speedy, and it's Odumbo that will block any action before it reaches the judicial system, speedy. That means if Hildebeest is elected, speedy, she will in all probability be the second Clinton and third president to be impeached, speedy. If Odumbo thwarts justice, Congress may be compelled to act, speedy.

Just disregard the last few seconds of the video, unless you wear speedos and admire your own ass everytime you pass a mirror...