So Trish... Let's have some fun.

I'll await your apology.
Originally Posted by Doove

As you are waiting for that from task
can you tell us more about that other forum you where talking about

As you are waiting for that from task
can you tell us more about that other forum you where talking about Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

You mean the Spider Hole? Whaddya wanna know?

You mean the Spider Hole? Whaddya wanna know? Originally Posted by Doove

not sure "Start anywhere"

If i lied, then i apologize. But i'm not seeing where i did.



Your comment wasn't about my coming to Trish's aid. Your comment was a shot at me, using my commenting on Trish's ban as an opportunity. Furthermore, your comment directed at me ignored what i've actually been saying. So speaking of lying...

I'll await your apology.

Frankly, with your twisting things, it's getting tougher and tougher to discern your posts from those of the Rockstar.

Nice rationalization, by the way. Originally Posted by Doove

Ok -- sorry that I ignored what you were saying. I was blinded by the sheen of your armor.

I will address that shortly.

Rationalization from me? No. Here is rationalization. A guy who is fully aware of the rules creates a second handle , and said he did it for innocent reasons. So breaking the rules is ok if you decide that it serves your personal interests and shouldn't matter to anyone else since it wasn't for a nefarious reason. That would be rationalization.

It would be something else too. That same member would never condone that action form another member -- or even an Admin. So -- you know the rules. You feel the rules apply to others. You feel the rules don't apply to you. That sounds somewhat like a narcissist.

Now the Trish thing , as I see a pattern. She broke a rule that is clearly a violation as set by the owners and admin of the Board. She was punished. You feel that was wrong and feel you have the right to decide whether the rules should apply to her even though you have no position of authority here. You likely would not have said a thing if it was the Rockstar who was banned for the same reason. Once again, who would feel they are in a position to decide which members should have to live by which rules , even though he has no authority? A narcissist perhaps.

Shoe fits.

As for me sounding more like the Rockstar in my posts? Well, you are sounding more like Doove in yours, and because you obviously can't see past yourself, I'll clue you in -- that's not a compliment.

As you have no credibility , I don't know why I am even engaging you and I will stop now. You may now have the last word, as I know from your past arguments with others and your personality, you couldn't live with yourself if you didn't have the last word.

Can I buy you a drink taskmaster?
That was some funny shit.

What a bunch of fags. Originally Posted by Bushman69

#3 - Disrespect to others, IN GENERAL, will be considered an item of low tolerance, especially when posting in our coed forums. Follow the Golden Rule and treat others as you wish to be treated yourself. This applies to fellow members as well as staff. We do not require that you have respect for us, but we do require that you treat us respectfully in the public forums. If you feel the need to vent, gripe, or blow off some steam regarding a staff member's action or decision, we ask that you keep it private. Email, RTM, or the PM system would be the appropriate avenue to take in such cases. In cases where you would like to request additional clarity about a staff decision, you are free to pursue an answer in either a public forum or private means of communication. If handled publicly, post your inquiry in a respectful manner.

Dont you already make his drinks for him?

Ok -- sorry that I ignored what you were saying. I was blinded by the sheen of your armor. Originally Posted by Taskmaster

Wasn't the only time, as we'll see.

Rationalization from me? No. Here is rationalization. A guy who is fully aware of the rules creates a second handle , and said he did it for innocent reasons. So breaking the rules is ok if you decide that it serves your personal interests and shouldn't matter to anyone else since it wasn't for a nefarious reason. That would be rationalization.

It would be something else too. That same member would never condone that action form another member -- or even an Admin. So -- you know the rules. You feel the rules apply to others. You feel the rules don't apply to you. That sounds somewhat like a narcissist.

Nope. Wrong. I never said the rules shouldn't apply to me. In fact, i pretty much suggested the opposite.

Only after the offer was rescinded did i say this:

"Ain't looking for any favors. I'm looking for you to do what you should have done; issue me some points and be done with it." Originally Posted by Doove

Feel free to click the link for the entire post.

My beef wasn't with the fact that i was penalized. It was over the severity of the penalty.

Now the Trish thing , as I see a pattern. She broke a rule that is clearly a violation as set by the owners and admin of the Board. She was punished. You feel that was wrong and feel you have the right to decide whether the rules should apply to her even though you have no position of authority here.

Wrong again. You're on a roll, i'll give ya that.

I'm pointing out that there's a difference between someone saying "I heard in the SH that so and so did such and such" and someone saying "they talked about so and so in the Spider Hole". The former is a pretty clear violation. The latter is something that, as i've pointed out, is done pretty regularly with, i can guarantee you, no punishment.

You likely would not have said a thing if it was the Rockstar who was banned for the same reason.

Hey, ya got one right!

Once again, who would feel they are in a position to decide which members should have to live by which rules , even though he has no authority? A narcissist perhaps.

Shoe fits.

Uh huh. Right. And aren't you the guy who wanted to chastise me over "self selected facts"?

Shoe fits.

As for me sounding more like the Rockstar in my posts? Well, you are sounding more like Doove in yours, and because you obviously can't see past yourself, I'll clue you in -- that's not a compliment.

As you have no credibility ,

Funny, but your opinion seemed quite different.....up until i simply pointed out that SAB has another side of the story than yours. Didn't even contradict your side, really, just that her side adds more context. And even better, i never even stated that her side was definitively true. Just that it existed. And now all of a sudden i have no credibility.

Must suck when you can't control someone.

I don't know why I am even engaging you and I will stop now. You may now have the last word, as I know from your past arguments with others and your personality, you couldn't live with yourself if you didn't have the last word.

When people lie about me, i tend to set them straight. And didn't you also accuse me of lying about you?

Shoe fits.

not sure "Start anywhere" Originally Posted by offshoredrilling

Can only tell ya what i know, OSD, and i've already done that.

I know it's filled with all the cool kids on the board, but beyond that i can't help ya more than i've already done.

The best part of this thread is where doove thincks he rates a conversation in the Spider Hole..........heh

The best part of this thread is where doove thincks he rates a conversation in the Spider Hole..........heh Originally Posted by dearhunter

You want my source?........heh

The best part of this thread is where doove thincks he rates a conversation in the Spider Hole..........heh Originally Posted by dearhunter

Give yourself points for mentioning the Unmentionable.....



elg.....

Give yourself points for mentioning the Unmentionable.....



elg..... Originally Posted by elghund

lol

good call eg.

You want my source?........heh Originally Posted by Doove

lol,

FWIW, OSD had nothing to do with the ban. Originally Posted by blthzr666

how would you know blitz?