Hillary starts her down hill run.....in the polls.

Who takes the lead in ANY job right from the start? An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience. You wouldn't know anything about that though. He did appear before a federal appellate court. I see you left that out. Originally Posted by WombRaider

Why don't you discuss something you know about? Now you are covering Obaminable's ass regarding is overstated resume.

"An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience."

When is Obaminable going to do that?

Here's what he does:



Who has more experience policing at that table?

Here's what he does: Originally Posted by LexusLover

And what does LLIdiot do?

The Patriarchal Idiot regularly posts pics that have little or no relevancy to the issue at hand.

While he's at it, he might as well throw in one of his patented twin towers pics for the 250th (or more) time.

Yes, you did. I've gone to the trouble of quoting it, so you aren't misunderstood. You said he never practiced law. The truth is, he did.

As for playing Clinton style, you have no idea... Originally Posted by WombRaider

Do you feel that you have to humilate yourself now. You have posted the evidence of your lie. Do you even understand English or is it a second langauge? Do you understand the difference between working for a law firm and being a lawyer? They are not the same thing.

Keep digging moron. We'll stand around and laugh at you.

Yes really!

JDIdiot, if you were not openly fantasizing about giving or receiving a blowjob from another guy, why would you have even brought the subject up in the first place? It is obvious that is something that you are wanting to make happen.

Sooner rather than later!

The thought of making a blowjob wager with you or anyone else, (male or female), has never occurred to me. That is, until you brought it up in this thread. That being the case, I have now (and never will have), a blowjob debt to pay (or recieve). Especially with another guy!

Just because you are openly fantasizing about making blowjob wagers with another guy, doesn't mean everyone else does.

My unsolicited advice, start posting your gay fantasy's in 'Another Realm.' Perhaps you will find another male to wager a blowjob with in that forum. Originally Posted by bigtex

This isn't a wager. This is a way for you to make amends. I understand your poverty and you inability to pay off your debts around here. I'm making it easy for you. You just have to supply one blowjob and I'll decide who gets it. You just tell the time and I'll set it up. Maybe I'll become a pimp daddy and Tampon will be my main whore. He has been wrong so many times.

Who takes the lead in ANY job right from the start? An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience. You wouldn't know anything about that though. He did appear before a federal appellate court. I see you left that out. Originally Posted by WombRaider

I'm curious about that "he did APPEAR before a federal appallate court". In what capacity? Usually they will say someone ARGUED before the court. Was he the clerk? Did he fetch the water for the real attorneys? Did he get the Clintons their coffee?

Can you cite the case so we can all look it up. If you do that then it will end the argument. If you don't...

I know nothing about this O'Malley guy. I guess he used to be Governor of Maryland. Is he a possibility, or is he a lying POS like the rest of them? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

He taxed rain water and is anti gun. enough said.

I'm curious about that "he did APPEAR before a federal appallate court". In what capacity? Usually they will say someone ARGUED before the court. Was he the clerk? Did he fetch the water for the real attorneys? Did he get the Clintons their coffee?

Can you cite the case so we can all look it up. If you do that then it will end the argument. If you don't... Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

Looking him up by attorney of record will not help, since he only "argued" the case allegedly. All his work seems vague ... kinda like his Presidency ... on top of that is ....

"An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience."

Apparently he has neglected to "defer' to his military advisors, and listens to Rice who is nothing more than an ass-kissing parrot...like his Press Secretary.

Do you feel that you have to humilate yourself now. You have posted the evidence of your lie. Do you even understand English or is it a second langauge? Do you understand the difference between working for a law firm and being a lawyer? They are not the same thing.

Keep digging moron. We'll stand around and laugh at you. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You should be asking yourself about English as a second language. Your posts are regularly replete with spelling and syntax errors. So let me get this straight; in order to dig this hole deeper, you're prepared to argue that being a lawyer and working in a law firm are somehow different. You go right ahead dumbass. You fucked up and now you're just going to keep digging.

Why don't you discuss something you know about? Now you are covering Obaminable's ass regarding is overstated resume.

"An intelligent person defers to people who might have more experience."

When is Obaminable going to do that?

Here's what he does:



Who has more experience policing at that table? Originally Posted by LexusLover

You can't even refer to the man by his name. It's subtle but hints at your deeper racist tendencies. It's a way for you to take a little dig at his humanity everytime you refer to him.

As for who had experience at that table, I only see two people who have experience being black in America...

You should be asking yourself about English as a second language. Your posts are regularly replete with spelling and syntax errors. Originally Posted by WombRaider

JD ... pretty much confirms its UC. He has no substance to offer so its "form" over matter ... no surprises there. Then its race baiting and name-calling.

WR/UC has experience being Black, because ...

...........he has had gfs who were Black for 10 years.

For some reason he thinks the Beer Summit was about being Black!!!!!

JD ... pretty much confirms its UC. He has no substance to offer so its "form" over matter ... no surprises there. Then its race baiting and name-calling.

WR/UC has experience being Black, because ...

...........he has had gfs who were Black for 10 years.

For some reason he thinks the Beer Summit was about being Black!!!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

For some reason, you think it wasn't. You're an old white man, what the fuck do you know about race?

No substance? From the guy who takes your point, screws it around like a pretzel and then vomits it back at you?

For some reason, you think it wasn't. You're an old white man, what the fuck do you know about race?

No substance? From the guy who takes your point, screws it around like a pretzel and then vomits it back at you? Originally Posted by WombRaider

Actually, the "beer summit" was about a "victory lap" for the affirmative action poster boy made good. Don't see the professor much since, right? He knows, and Obaminable was "sealing the deal' to bite his tongue, while strutting "his stuff" for the Prof. Sad.

The humor is: The cop knows more about the "hosts" in one sitting than they could ever know about him. That's what happens to self-absorbed narcissists.

Back to Hillarious and the pant suit circus ...

.. Her "conversation with America" is so incredibly phony .... she's behaving like a beached whale gasping to be relevant. She even looks fake. I don't know whose idea this was, but tactically I think this was a mistake.

Mingling with the "commoners"!!!

Actually, the "beer summit" was about a "victory lap" for the affirmative action poster boy made good. Don't see the professor much since, right? He knows, and Obaminable was "sealing the deal' to bite his tongue, while strutting "his stuff" for the Prof. Sad.

The humor is: The cop knows more about the "hosts" in one sitting than they could ever know about him. That's what happens to self-absorbed narcissists.

Back to Hillarious and the pant suit circus ...

.. Her "conversation with America" is so incredibly phony .... she's behaving like a beached whale gasping to be relevant. She even looks fake. I don't know whose idea this was, but tactically I think this was a mistake.

Mingling with the "commoners"!!! Originally Posted by LexusLover

The humor is in the fact you actually think anyone gives a flying fuck. A politician being phony? Jesus Christ! Call the newspapers! Film at 11. I'm sure she's on the edge of her seat waiting to see what Lexus Lover thinks of her tactics.

This isn't a wager. Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

It was clearly an attempt on JDIdiot's part to initiate an "after the fact" wager. The first attempt at setting the terms and conditions were made a full year after the fact. Correct me if I am wrong, the first mention of a blowjob tied to a wager was made by JDIdiot in post #52 of this thread. Please post the appropriate link if JDIdiot first referenced his gay blowjob wager fantasy earlier.

With that established, the remedy you (JDIdiot) tried to implement (unbeknownst to me) was for the loser to give the winner a "blowjob." It stands to reason that JDIdiot was willing to give me a "blowjob," if I were to win. It should be noted: NEITHER OPTION WILL EVER OCCUR IN THIS LIFETIME.

While a male giving another male a "blowjob" appears to be a common occurence in Idiotville, let the record show that I don't swing that way.

With all of that said, I am willing to make a generous counteroffer to JDIdiot's gay luvin' blowjob offer. My counter offer is that if the missing Malaysia 777 (Flight 370) is found within a 15 month period (June 8, 2015) from the date it was first reported missing (March 8, 2014) and is determined by CNN to have been hijacked and parked on a deserted island under the cover of hundreds upon hundreds of shrubs being used as camouflage.

If that were to occur, I will owe JDIdiot $500. Otherwise JDIdiot will owe me $500. If my terms are too rich for JD's Idiot blood, I could be persuaded to accept another JLIdiot style wager of 5 year ban from posting in the ECCIE Political Forum that would be applied to the loser as described in the paragraph above.

JDIdiot, do we have a deal?