It proves that he should have done something different had he not wanted to get fired.
Originally Posted by WTF
It proves nothing relative to the incident. It would not be admissible in any criminal or civil action against him, because .... it does not tend to be probative of any fact related to the incident .... as to whether or not he acted reasonably under the circumstances ...
Let me repeat: the only place it means anything is between your ears in that empty space with the echo of your lameass presumptions ... like ..
Zimmerman is going to get convicted of "something" related to Martin's death.
What should he have done differently .... ? I'll tell you what ..
... refused to respond to the call!
Then there would be a real reason to fire him .... "insubordination"!!!!
You're the Big Guy who's against "government intervention" ....
... but you want MORE INTERVENTION .....
The teacher should be fired for nonfeasance; the administrative supervisor and the administrator who called the police should be fired for misfesance ..... and the kid should be banished to a reform school for aggravated assault on a police officer .... problem ....
..... this little turd was not old enough!!!!