Obama makes public his stance on Amb. Rice

turn on Fox News, Beck, Rush et al and if the comments on this thread dont mirror theirs I'll apologize for COF being such a moron ... Originally Posted by CJ7

I don't know what they're saying, but if they agree with me, they will be right for a change.

He also said the changes didn't come from the white house.. Originally Posted by ekim008

The "white house" means the physicial facility? or sybolically the Administration?

This was the administration ... all in house ... all coordinated .. passing around the memo to tweak the language ending up painting a picture of a crowd turned unruly over a movie with no direct ties to terrorism ... 180 degrees from the CIA memo.

I don't know what they're saying, but if they agree with me, they will be right for a change.

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

rest assured, its not the same thing they said about Condi Rice

How would anyone on this board have ...

..."proof that the CIA knowingly gave Sec Rice and the congress false information"?

If the CIA Director says he sent out a memo that said XYZ, which he claims was his assessment, and then the Ambassador to the U.N. says she got a memo saying ABC, it is rather clear that:

1. The CIA Director is lying
2. Some between the two changed the memo language or
3. The U.N. Ambassador is lying.

You pick. Originally Posted by LexusLover

That's exactly the problem LL, we would be guessing. As you have now admitted, nobody on this board has proof of what they are asserting against the O administration.

Let's get the other sides of the story.

SUMMARY: On November 14th, 2012, Odumbo went before the WH press corps and stated that anything Ambassador Rice did, she did because he told her to.

I live in NY COF, King is a fucking asshole.

This all comes down to one thing.

If there is any evidence that the white house somehow took information given to them by the CIA and intentionally twisted it, then you have your conspiracy. And there will be no denying it.

However, as of yet, there is NO such evidence, only conjecture and assumptions. Let all the facts and testimony come out first, let's hear from all sides. Is that so hard? Originally Posted by markroxny

I think you hate him because he's white. In fact, I'm sure you hate him!

YOU HATE HIM! YOU HATE HIM! YOU HATE HIM!



For you newbies, I'm mocking a playground rant KarlMarxRoxny threw at me a few weeks ago. LOL!

But just as I promised, here is Rep. King's press conference:

http://mrctv.org/videos/king-petraeu...down-terrorism

Just as we thought. Obama lied to cover his ass before the election.

Another mature post by COF.

Oh and for you newbies, here is his brazen hypocrisy at work:

... But you are so full of hate, you can't see straight. You're a hater, and that's what hater's do. They hate. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

...
"Hate" is such a cheap argument. It effectively closes off any reasonable dissent. It's the last vestige of a coward with no substantive argument. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

The "white house" means the physicial facility? or sybolically the Administration?

This was the administration ... all in house ... all coordinated .. passing around the memo to tweak the language ending up painting a picture of a crowd turned unruly over a movie with no direct ties to terrorism ... 180 degrees from the CIA memo. Originally Posted by LexusLover

You hope...

It's Obama's Administration. Obama said he sent Rice out with the "best intelligence" they had. That was a lie. It is no one else's fault BUT Obama!

Gawd, you are stupid!

Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Gawd you are blind..for days the wingers have been wanting him to testify and when he doesn't say what you want to hear you spin it.STFU..