Will Hillary be the Democratic Party's 2016 nominee?

That Bitch could club baby seals on prime time television and she would receive a thunderous applause from the mainstream media hacks who have not engaged in real journalism in decades. The fix is in, she will be the next POTUS and all you fuckers will do nothing about it. This country died a long fucking time ago........ Long guns and butter and balkanization. All you bitches out there better get ready to get raped or stoned to death by muzzies a' la Sweeden. Originally Posted by fleshreview

Thanks for the honesty!


That Bitch could club baby seals on prime time television and she would receive a thunderous applause from the mainstream media hacks who have not engaged in real journalism in decades. The fix is in, she will be the next POTUS and all you fuckers will do nothing about it. This country died a long fucking time ago........ Long guns and butter and balkanization. All you bitches out there better get ready to get raped or stoned to death by muzzies a' la Sweeden. Originally Posted by fleshreview
Another dimatard throwing in the towel
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Any chance of this forum becoming less of a circle jerk went out the window when Hillary kicked the Benghazi witch hunting committee's whiny asses.

You howler monkeys ought to be grateful that you will be able to play in the points-free zone for another eight yeas.

Maybe during that time, you'll grow a pair and go back to reviewing whookers.

(Yeah, dipshits, I know. It's the media's fault)
LexusLover's Avatar
...when Hillary kicked the Benghazi witch hunting committee's whiny asses.

.... It's the media's fault) Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
This is the same "media" that "convicted" Zimmerman for the death of Martin, and the Ferguson PD Officer for the death of Brown?

(The list is much longer.)

BTW: Has Hellarious "Martha Stewart" Clinton had her "interview" yet? She just trashed her "old boss" and his foreign policy under oath while she was "kicking ass" as you say.
BTW: Has Hellarious "Martha Stewart" Clinton had her "interview" yet? Originally Posted by LexusLover
"Has" LLIdiot answered the "simple" question that he has been duckin' & dodgin' for months "yet?"

Fuk'n Cowardly Idiot!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-26-2015, 10:19 AM
This is the same "media" that "convicted" Zimmerman for the death of Martin, and the Ferguson PD Officer for the death of Brown?

(The list is much longer.)

BTW: Has Hellarious "Martha Stewart" Clinton had her "interview" yet? She just trashed her "old boss" and his foreign policy under oath while she was "kicking ass" as you say. Originally Posted by LexusLover
It is the same media that was complicit in the run up to the Iraq War and afterward.


http://www.republicansforhumility.com/media.html




.
Trump Train is our only chance! Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/26/politi...oll/index.html

Could it be that the Iowa "Trump Train" is missing in action?

All aboard!
http://www.cnn.com/2015/10/26/politi...oll/index.html

Could it be that the Iowa "Trump Train" is missing in action?

All aboard! Originally Posted by bigtex
Sorry to fuck up your edit, bgitex


LexusLover's Avatar
It is the same media that was complicit in the run up to the Iraq War and afterward. Originally Posted by WTF
That's back when Congress was "bi-partisan" and Hellarious was a Senator!

http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-10...107publ243.htm

" Whereas in 1990 in response to Iraq's war of aggression against and
illegal occupation of Kuwait, the United States forged a coalition
of nations to liberate Kuwait and its people in order to defend the
national security of the United States and enforce United Nations
Security Council resolutions relating to Iraq;

Whereas after the liberation of Kuwait in 1991, Iraq entered into a
United Nations sponsored cease-fire agreement pursuant to which Iraq
unequivocally agreed, among other things, to eliminate its nuclear,
biological, and chemical weapons programs and the means to deliver
and develop them, and to end its support for international
terrorism;

Whereas the efforts of international weapons inspectors, United States
intelligence agencies, and Iraqi defectors led to the discovery that
Iraq had large stockpiles of chemical weapons and a large scale
biological weapons program, and that Iraq had an advanced nuclear
weapons development program that was much closer to producing a
nuclear weapon than intelligence reporting had previously indicated;

Whereas Iraq, in direct and flagrant violation of the cease-fire,
attempted to thwart the efforts of weapons inspectors to identify
and destroy Iraq's weapons of mass destruction stockpiles and
development capabilities, which finally resulted in the withdrawal
of inspectors from Iraq on October 31, 1998;

Whereas in Public Law 105-235 (August 14, 1998), Congress concluded that Iraq's continuing weapons of mass destruction programs threatened vital United States interests and international peace and security,
declared Iraq to be in ``material and unacceptable breach of its
international obligations'' and urged the President ``to take
appropriate action, in accordance with the Constitution and relevant
laws of the United States, to bring Iraq into compliance with its
international obligations''
;

Whereas Iraq both poses a continuing threat to the national security of
the United States and international peace and security in the
Persian Gulf region and remains in material and unacceptable breach
of its international obligations by, among other things, continuing
to possess and develop a significant chemical and biological weapons
capability, actively seeking a nuclear weapons capability, and
supporting and harboring terrorist organizations;

Whereas Iraq persists in violating resolution of the United Nations
Security Council by continuing to engage in brutal repression of its
civilian population thereby threatening international peace and security in the region, by refusing to release, repatriate, or account for non-Iraqi citizens wrongfully detained by Iraq, including an American serviceman, and by failing to return property wrongfully seized by Iraq from Kuwait;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its capability and
willingness to use weapons of mass destruction against other nations
and its own people;

Whereas the current Iraqi regime has demonstrated its continuing
hostility toward, and willingness to attack, the United States,
including by attempting in 1993 to assassinate former President Bush
and by firing on many thousands of occasions on United States and
Coalition Armed Forces engaged in enforcing the resolutions of the
United Nations Security Council;

Whereas members of al Qaida, an organization bearing responsibility for
attacks on the United States, its citizens, and interests, including
the attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, are known to be in
Iraq;

Whereas Iraq continues to aid and harbor other international terrorist
organizations, including organizations that threaten the lives and
safety of United States citizens;

Whereas the attacks on the United States of September 11, 2001,
underscored the gravity of the threat posed by the acquisition of
weapons of mass destruction by international terrorist
organizations;

Whereas Iraq's demonstrated capability and willingness to use weapons of
mass destruction, the risk that the current Iraqi regime will either
employ those weapons to launch a surprise attack against the United
States or its Armed Forces or provide them to international
terrorists who would do so, and the extreme magnitude of harm that
would result to the United States and its citizens from such an
attack, combine to justify action by the United States to defend
itself;

Whereas United Nations Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) authorizes the use of all necessary means to enforce United Nations Security
Council Resolution 660 (1990) and subsequent relevant resolutions
and to compel Iraq to cease certain activities that threaten
international peace and security, including the development of
weapons of mass destruction and refusal or obstruction of United
Nations weapons inspections in violation of United Nations Security
Council Resolution 687 (1991), repression of its civilian population
in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688
(1991), and threatening its neighbors or United Nations operations
in Iraq in violation of United Nations Security Council Resolution
949 (1994)
;

Whereas in the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq
Resolution (Public Law 102-1), Congress has authorized the President
``to use United States Armed Forces pursuant to United Nations
Security Council Resolution 678 (1990) in order to achieve
implementation of Security Council Resolution 660, 661, 662, 664,
665, 666, 667, 669, 670, 674, and 677'';

Whereas in December 1991, Congress expressed its sense that it ``supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the goals of
United Nations Security Council Resolution 687 as being consistent
with the Authorization of Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution (Public Law 102-1),'' that Iraq's repression of its
civilian population violates United Nations Security Council
Resolution 688 and ``constitutes a continuing threat to the peace,
security, and stability of the Persian Gulf region,'' and that
Congress, ``supports the use of all necessary means to achieve the
goals of United Nations Security Council Resolution 688''
;

Whereas the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 (Public Law 105-338) expressed the sense of Congress that it should be the policy of the United
States to support efforts to remove from power the current Iraqi
regime and promote the emergence of a democratic government to
replace that regime;


Whereas on September 12, 2002, President Bush committed the United
States to ``work with the United Nations Security Council to meet
our common challenge'' posed by Iraq and to ``work for the necessary
resolutions,'' while also making clear that ``the Security Council
resolutions will be enforced, and the just demands of peace and
security will be met, or action will be unavoidable'';

Whereas the United States is determined to prosecute the war on
terrorism and Iraq's ongoing support for international terrorist
groups combined with its development of weapons of mass destruction
in direct violation of its obligations under the 1991 cease-fire and
other United Nations Security Council resolutions make clear that it
is in the national security interests of the United States and in
furtherance of the war on terrorism that all relevant United Nations
Security Council resolutions be enforced, including through the use
of force if necessary;

Whereas Congress has taken steps to pursue vigorously the war on
terrorism through the provision of authorities and funding requested
by the President to take the necessary actions against international
terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations,
organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or
aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or
harbored such persons or organizations;

Whereas the President and Congress are determined to continue to take
all appropriate actions against international terrorists and
terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or
persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist
attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001, or harbored such
persons or organizations;

Whereas the President has authority under the Constitution to take action in order to deter and prevent acts of international terrorism
against the United States, as Congress recognized in the joint
resolution on Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law
107-40);
and

Whereas it is in the national security interests of the United States to
restore international peace and security to the Persian Gulf region:"

Thanks for another opportunity for a history lesson using truth instead of your wishful dreaming. Sounds like Hellarious could use one also. You two think alike.
LexusLover's Avatar
Originally Posted by IIFFOFRDB

You can put McCain on that list ... BigTits supported him in 2000.....

... until he "switched" to Gore ... then John Kerry!!!!
Jesus if you can figure out who he supported if it wasn't Hillary then you have major problems.



You do not speak for nobody.

I will leave it up to BT to say how I know who he supported in 2008. But I know for a fact it was not Hillary. Are you as stupid as LL and need to know who if not Hillary? Originally Posted by WTF
I don't speak for nobody but WTF does! Hillarious! BTW, did BT way WHO he supported?

Turdy, the Idiot Turdfly, I have NEVER, I repeat NEVER, been "a massive Hillary supporter," as you previously claimed. That is true up to and including the days, weeks, months (and even years) leading up to and including the 2008 Texas primaries.

Please post the link stating otherwise or STFU! ..... Originally Posted by bigtex
Please produce your ballot or STFU. That's not what I said. I said you were a massive Hillary supporter. For almost a decade I been making fun of your "hand picked candidate Hillary Clinton" and you've been crawfishing on it. BTW, did you say who you actually voted for? Other than Hillary? You are just lucky the wayback machine is shitty.

Somebody lied about BT supporting HRC in 2008. I corrected that lie. You chimed in with "How would you know?" Originally Posted by WTF
No I didn't, Mr Poor Reading Comprehension (aka Moronic Buffoon). BTW, how would you "officially know?" Were you in the "polling booth" giving your reacharound buddy help pulling his lever?



(BKTSA4E)
LexusLover's Avatar
[SIZE=3]
You do not speak for nobody. Originally Posted by WTF
Let's see ..... that means you speak for somebody, right? You speak for yourself, right?

BTW, how would you "officially know?" Originally Posted by gnadfly
He knows what people "think" .. even Obaminable .....

...... who reads prompters to avoid "thinking" out loud.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 10-27-2015, 03:43 PM
Let's see ..... that means you speak for somebody, right? You speak for yourself, right?



He knows what people "think" .. even Obaminable .....

...... who reads prompters to avoid "thinking" out loud. Originally Posted by LexusLover
So you know that Obama reads promoters to keep from thinking
LexusLover's Avatar
So you know that Obama reads promoters to keep from thinking.... Originally Posted by WTF
He IS a promoter!

He promotes snake oil, which I mentioned YEARS AGO! He also promotes himself.