also, fyi, eccie is NOT seen as a reputable website...and outside of the midwest, i have never even heard of it and i can't believe P411 even accepts reviews off here, as TER does NOT!! Originally Posted by iris.hart
also, fyi, eccie is NOT seen as a reputable website...and outside of the midwest, i have never even heard of it and i can't believe P411 even accepts reviews off here, as TER does NOT!! Originally Posted by iris.hartIf you find that "Eccie is NOT seen as a reputable website", I am very curious as to why you spend any time on the site?
It would be easier if it was written down in one place, where we can access it.I had a provider to ask three ladies for a reference and only got a response from one, the other two ladies I sent a text message to and asked them if they had received the pm from the other provider and one of the ladies text me back and said she would NOT help another provider make money. A review on clients should have limits such as safety concerns. Anything else is pointless because the provider is supposed to provide, she is the one that's supposed to be sexy and good in bed, NOT the client so whether he is fat or not cute shouldn't matter as long as he isn't a psychopath.
I have asked for references, and when asking the providers to respond.. I've only gotten about 10% to respond. How does that help? As the providers.. we are the ONLY ones out here who can protect other providers.
I have been lucky, so far, only getting nice guys. Originally Posted by NakeyaEla
Reviews for clients? Someone's got to be kidding.
How long would an escort last in this biz if she went around talking about which clients were fat, ugly, lousy in the sack, etc.? Although I certainly can understand why she'd want to minimize the risk of meeting time wasters, assholes, potential stalkers, and otherwise undesirable jerks. But, I thought that was what P411 was for.
Really, though, how often do you think a provider would write an overly negative review? Some would probably try to flood the forum with glowing reports that would amount to little more than a great additional source of free advertising.
Besides, is it really appropriate for providers to publicly state who they've seen? Doesn't anybody value discretion? Originally Posted by Ex-CEO