$100 REWARD...

Hey Whir-LIE-turd... Is there any nation out there that doesn't scare the Bejesus out of you?

I heard Mexico is considering shortening siesta nationwide so their poor folks can pack for the continue invasion of the US!

And somewhere in Germany, a guy sneezed this morning, and the snot landed in the shape of Ohio.

It's gotta be a bitch to go through life with shit in your shorts.

Psssst -- if they break the agreement, we can still send our young people over there to die. So you're covered in any event.

Hunker down bunker clown.

You seem completely out to lunch, assup. Is the Dipshit of the Year speaking gibberish again? Originally Posted by lustylad

OOOOhhhhhh... Junior caught a typo!

Great fucking job, dipshit.

I expect you to pay just as close attention to your knuckledragging heroes.

Send the money you dishonest doucher.

http://tabletmag.com/jewish-news-and...-nuclear-fatwa

How about producing a contemporaneous report from the Iranian News Agency of the fatawa?

If the president (Obama) is so confident it exists, then his administration should be able to produce a copy of the fatwa, revealing when it was written and what it says. The Washington Post’s fact checker went looking for the fatwa in November 2013, as administration officials were citing it at the time, and couldn’t find it.

http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/...wa_893288.html Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I'll keep posting this until you pay up. For someone who says $100 ain't shit, you sure seem to be holding on to it pretty fucking hard.

"Caitlin Hayden, a spokeswoman for the White House National Security Council, said the Iranian government was the best source for information. But she added: “Many Iranian officials have spoken of the fatwa publicly, and their comments are publicly available. There are various descriptions of it in the public domain. And importantly, the Iranians have also referenced the fatwa in our negotiations.”

Indeed, the Iranian government’s slick new Web site on its nuclear program, www.nuclearenergy.ir, includes an entire section on the nuclear fatwa.

Give it up, douche, king of all the bags.

I've got a deal. Hey, whir-LIE-turd!

I'll pay you $100 bucks if you can produce the quote from Martin Luther King, Jr., where he sayS he opposes illegal immigration.

See how that works?

Still waiting for the proof.......check/cash ready.........

If the fatwa exists, why not produce the proof of its existence?

Answer: It doesn't exist. There was no fatwa.

See below audio link at about 19.40 mark......

http://johnbatchelorshow.com/podcast...s-mccotter-wjr

Still waiting for the proof.......check/cash ready.........

If the fatwa exists, why not produce the proof of its existence?

Answer: It doesn't exist. There was no fatwa.

See below audio link at about 19.40 mark......

http://johnbatchelorshow.com/podcast...s-mccotter-wjr Originally Posted by Whirlaway

You've been shown this before. Pay up, motherhuncher. You lose, dipshit.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...clear-weapons/


"An official Iranian statement released on August 9, 2005 at the Vienna meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a fatwa forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons.

Thanks for posting the WAPO Fact Checker article. It asks the question:

Did Iran’s supreme leader issue a fatwa against the development of nuclear weapons?

And their answer to the question was:

Verdict Pending

In other words, there is NOT sufficient proof that a fatwa exists. WAPO couldn't find the fatwa.

You've been shown this before. Pay up, motherhuncher. You lose, dipshit.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...clear-weapons/


"An official Iranian statement released on August 9, 2005 at the Vienna meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) published that Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had issued a fatwa forbidding the production, stockpiling and use of nuclear weapons. Originally Posted by WombRaider

IMO: If it's not written there's no there there. As someone else has pointed out the interpretation of "development", "production" and "use" is also up in the air.

It's reported in Whirley's link that Iran admitted to producing the chemicals for a chemical weapons (WMDs) but simply not weaponizing them. Which could be a total lie since they aren't allowing inspections or simply mean they are 30 minutes away from loading chemicals into a warhead.

More ignorant fear mongering by the smelly il' Turdfly...

Don't you idiots ever get tired of dodging the falling sky?

Simpering pussies!

Still waiting for the proof.......check/cash ready.........

If the fatwa exists, why not produce the proof of its existence?

Answer: It doesn't exist. There was no fatwa.

See below audio link at about 19.40 mark......

http://johnbatchelorshow.com/podcast...s-mccotter-wjr Originally Posted by Whirlaway

No checks you welching piece of shit. You refuse to pay your obligations and then when ready to pony up, you think I am going to take a check? Fucking douchebag.

You wouldn't take a cashier's check?

But no worry; WAPO can't prove the fatwa exists, you can't either.

You wouldn't take a cashier's check?

But no worry; WAPO can't prove the fatwa exists, you can't either. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

I didn't read your link because you are a liar and a welcher but I did see that we have now upgraded your prior assertion.....the verdict is out as the whether there was a fatwa>?

If so, can I at least get $50 or half of what you promised me.....you no-account dishonest four-flushing cheating welcher?

Tim

Don't read Wombraider's link, I could care less if you read it or don't. But by refusing to read the WAPO fact check you prove your own bias on this issue.


Facts matter, WAPO asked the question, and determined "Verdict Pending"...in other words, they couldn't find the proof that the Fatwa existed.

Run and hide from the facts; but demand payment? I don't think so.

I didn't read your link because you are a liar and a welcher but I did see that we have now upgraded your prior assertion.....the verdict is out as the whether there was a fatwa>?

If so, can I at least get $50 or half of what you promised me.....you no-account dishonest four-flushing cheating welcher?

Tim Originally Posted by timpage

Don't read Wombraider's link, I could care less if you read it or don't. But by refusing to read the WAPO fact check you prove your own bias on this issue.


Facts matter, WAPO asked the question, and determined "Verdict Pending"...in other words, they couldn't find the proof that the Fatwa existed.

Run and hide from the facts; but demand payment? I don't think so. Originally Posted by Whirlaway

Did you click on the link to Iran's own website where it clearly states that a fatwa WAS issued? You didn't specify that it had to be an active Fatwa. You simply said that one had never been issued, you've been proven incorrect. You choose to believe WaPo, even though the Iranians themselves admit to issuing a Fatwa.