So who is SassySue?

So is the new ban for trying to circumvent the old ban with multiple handles? Originally Posted by lustylad

That would be a bad precedent for WTF.

Do you get the impression that the providers (females) want Hillary because they believe she will be "friendly" to their professional status? Originally Posted by LexusLover

Whores for Hillary!

It has a 'ring' to it.

Do you get the impression that the providers (females) want Hillary because they believe she will be "friendly" to their professional status? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I don't think so. I think she is being "Politically Correct" to be on the good side of Hilliary. she is after all a woman, in that vein, sisters got to stick together.

So, it would appear, is SassySue. Originally Posted by chicagoboy

Any idea why he was banned? I looked a few weeks ago and couldn't find a single post of his that wasn't in the Political forum. Given that he appeared to spend every waking hour posting here I figured there was an outside chance he was being paid to post. Or more likely a volunteer, a retired guy or someone on social security disability who thought he was doing his party and comrades a favor by changing minds on eccie.net. That is, he was deluded.

Sue is a gorgeous lady with an inquisitive mind. I don't agree with her much, but she does a good job of defending her ideas. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Why don't you fuck him and post a review.

The law is anti provider.

Funny. We can discuss whookerism here, infidelity, fetish, even glory holes. And now we can debate the traitorous behavior of a presidential candidate and his knowing, willing invitation to a foreign power to invade our security. But we can't discuss legalizing (forbidden topic).

I wonder why that's not allowed in the more than half the country where it is legalism one form or another. Even in Texas. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

Are you referring to Hillary selling uranium to Russia?