Client controlled market: paying what you want

Not Obama socialism that some cheap ass's are wanting. Originally Posted by JJ Fun Guy

Uh oh... now you just pissed off 47% of the country!

I'm glad you were able to figure that all by yourself JS42! Yes it was a fucking joke!And nobody is stopping you from finding another provider that charges less.It's called free market capitalism.Not Obama socialism that some cheap ass's are wanting. Originally Posted by JJ Fun Guy

All I have to say is , I think your a little lost!

Don't get your panties in a ruffle dude. If you would have noticed, we posted at the same time, so I had no idea you were joking.

Wher can I line up for the free Obama pussy? Got the hooker phone thanks my fellow taxpayers!

Or gimmie some of that free Obama money and I promise to use it on that free market capitalism snapper!!

Thank you! Thank You! LOL LOL Glad I could bring laughter/fun to the board and liven it up!LOL LOL No I did not piss off only 47% of the country,I actually pissed off 52% ,which is the vote per cent of what Obama carried in the last election.LOL
But seriously a discussion on here of hobbists showing up for appointmens and then trying to negiotate with providers down in a price of what they were previously quoted ?I mean if its that money important for the hobbist,why not stay home in the first place and save all of the money?On the other hand I sure don't condone any "upselling"by providers either.That is VERY wrong!

Did the recent sequester showdown with Congress hurt Obama's free pussy money give away program?LOL LOL I was in favor of the Sequester but I am in favor of freeing the free pussy money to stimulate our poor economy!LOL

Technically, JJ, I was referring to Romney's now-infamous comments that 47% of the country was dependent on the government, not the election margin.

This is generally where I say, but back to the OP's topic, but.... can we let this thread die soon, too? PLEASE....?!?!?!?!?

this is america, capitalism, free market, money talks..., there,now we all know where we are at.

rude? how? she sets a price based on what she thinks, you offer what you think she is worth

she's rude and disrespectful to not negoate and if you dont try cause you are afraid of hurting her "feelings" or something, why dont you just give me some money and leave, it would be " rude and disrespectful!" to make her earn her money.

have I missed the poster who tried to negotiate and the lady hung up on him, tell him she doesnt do that? Originally Posted by blade78

See Comment #5

http://eccie.net/showthread.php?t=698343&highlight=

I rest my case.

You might as well smash your face into a brick wall rather then attempt to interject logic into this conversation. It would not only save time, but cause less pain.

....... We all have our wants, needs & rules. Originally Posted by Allie_Kat

It is our personal rules that keep each of us safe.

JR

Over the years, I have had more than a few ladies refuse to take a tip, or more than they asked in the first place. One of my friends was quite blunt about it, she said: "We both had fun, maybe me more than you: I just get some money at the same time." For some of the young girls it is all about the money, for many of the ladies it is not just about the money. Ladies have feelings too. I am sure there are some guys that could not get a date for twice or three times the stated rate. Am I right ladies?

Stay safe,

JR

Oh goodness, it appears a lot has transpired over the past 48 hours. I could stay up all night reading but then Monday would be a goner.

Well you have received a number of well thought out... Originally Posted by SinsOfTheFlesh

Sins, read your response and I like your perspective and the way you presented it. Thank you for your input. You are correct that I was waiting for men to speak up and confirm if they would take advantage of such an offer and pay less. I wasn't necessarily looking for anything detailing whether or not the business model would work.

No offense, but never thought I would see the day a provider rate would get turned into rocket science. PleasantSurprise, you are way over thinking this... Originally Posted by JS42

JS42, you know, I didn't really put much thought into anything, it was a concept that just entered my mind one day and I thought hey what the hell, eccie's a board, here we go. I appreciate you for providing your reasons for why the concept wouldn't work.

So if we don't click and I tried I'm not going to give you any money back Originally Posted by b@ileythepistol

Would this be if the client stayed the entire time? Or if you don't click and he leaves halfway through the appointment? At what point do you decide whether or not to give any money back?

To return to your original premise: The short answer to your question is 'no'. Originally Posted by The Sixth Beatle

Is this "no" you wouldn't see her at all?

I wouldn't. The chances for conflict is too great. Just put a price on the time offered and the client can either pay or pass. Originally Posted by Starry69

Do you mean you would not see her at all because she's flexible in what she accepts? There is always the choice to still see her, and just pay the full rate if it is within what you're willing to pay.

Its a two way street with the trust in the business. A girl should generally know within a minute if she has to worry about 1 taking care of her or not. Originally Posted by Chrome 1

+1

I think the provider in your hypothetical would end up with a sore pussy and and empty pocket book. Originally Posted by dirty dog

You may be right. Does that mean you'd see her?

i once asked on aspd "do you consider hobbying to be a bus ride [pay at the beginning] or taxi ride [pay at the end]?".
a wise man answered [paraphrased after 10+ yrs of memory loss]...
"it's a limo ride - the fee is arranged in advanced and paid at the end of the ride" Originally Posted by pmdelites

I almost always pay after. It just seems to flow better. Originally Posted by merz5

My experience have also been the best when I just drop it at the end. It does flow better. Originally Posted by Chrome 1

I like the way you think pmdelites, merz5, and chrome.

In the end, the power is with me/johns, we dont need to see you, we can see someone/no one else. Originally Posted by blade78

Agreed.

Well I'm aware that the sliding scale donation practice is very common with tantra providers.

I think it's a fantastic idea. You get to work with more of a variety of people from all classes, not just the 'rich' upper class. And the guys who adore you are gonna lean toward the higher range, haha also perhaps to show off because they can. Originally Posted by Zabrina Sarafina

Finally, someone like myself who doesn't think it's a horrible idea! All because it is acceptable to pay a lower rate, doesn't mean the client has to cross that line and actually pay less. Paying the full rate is still allowed!

But, a deposit is always required before you get that ride.

Originally Posted by MsElena

MsElena great point!

Wow, I think some people have way to much time on their heads and are overthinking a profession that has managed to survive for thousands of years. Its pretty simple:

Girl sets price, you either pay it or you dont, if you want to pay more, pay more, if you dont then pay less but dont come on the board and bitch when no one will deal with you anymore.

Pleasant, too much talk and not enough action. I'm horny and have 80 bucks, lets test your theory.