Babe I have talked to 3 of them actually, and I can't exactly tell you who. ALL said that it was nothing but solid bcd and only a 10 min. water break every hour. All that and for less than $1500. They said you take FOREVER to get off and each time got worse and worse with solid ACG, and hardcore Penetration.
They said it was nothing but WORK, and not much fun. This was about a year ago when we had a thread going in nola. You were arguing with said provider and she let me in on a few things. After that 2 more had contacted me saying much of the same. Told them I did not much care because we would never see each other.
One girl literally said she had to take 2 weeks off because she got a really bad infection..NOT an STD. Don't want anyone to take that the wrong way he he.
Hell I aint mad at ya, but that would never work for me. I doubt my standards would work for you either though. If these women know what you want first hand and agree to see you, obviously they have the drive and stamina to be able to handle a guy like you. Bottom line is what is being said behind your back is not the same thing being said to your face. If a girl needs money that bad, she is going to say anything to get it sometimes.
Originally Posted by London Rayne
I don't have much of a dog in the fight between London and gimmethat. But this post concerned me because it appeared to violate some of ECCIE Guidelines, as follows:
- #9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.
- #16 - Posting about/Speculating about another person's medical condition is strictly forbidden. If a member encounters a medical issue and would like to get feedback from others or share it with the community, this would be allowed, but under no circumstances is a member to discuss or state anything about another member in this regard, unless it is in response to a question posed by that member.
In London's defense, she doesn't say that it was a pm she got on this board, or phone calls. However, I don't think it is a good idea to take private communications and make them public.
Now, alluding to the medical condition is wanton and uncalled for. Here, London is reporting that someone else got an infection, and
infers that it was the result of the meeting between that someone else and gimmethat. Infections have a variety of causes, and probably a doctor couldn't tell how or why the infection occurred. London says that it was NOT an STD, but by doing so we all imagine the worst: STD (whether true or not).
Just my .02