Here ass breath.
1. The statement was from Oct.
Editor's note: We've attached an update to this fact-check below in response to reader queries after subsequent testimony by James Clapper. The original fact-check and rating remain unchanged
On Oct. 7, however — the same day WikiLeaks released the emails of Clinton campaign chair John Podesta — the Homeland Security Department and Office of the Director of National Intelligence released a joint statement that said, "The U.S. Intelligence Community (USIC) is confident that the Russian Government directed the recent compromises of emails from U.S. persons and institutions, including from U.S. political organizations."
The statement added that the recent hacks "are consistent with the methods and motivations of Russian-directed efforts. These thefts and disclosures are intended to interfere with the US election process."
The statement also said the intelligence community believes these attacks are directed from top levels of the Russian government, as Clinton said.
"We believe, based on the scope and sensitivity of these efforts, that only Russia's senior-most officials could have authorized these activities," the statement said.
The U.S. Intelligence Community is made up of 17 agencies, forming the basis of Clinton’s claim.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-me...ikileaks-rele/
So at the time, the statement was made, it was true. If you would read the whole thing you would have seen the reasoning.
Using what you call "reasoning" you would claim every scientist and textbook prior to the downgrade of Pluto's status was lying because they said there were 9 planets of equal status.
Plus your op-ed was focused on this spring so STFU.
2. And now you want to argue what half true means. Politifact pointed out the issues. Did you catch that douche-bag? Just because you don't agree with their term you say they're lying.
Once again this is just your opinion. No factual proof of any kind that Politifact lied. They describe all circumstances involved in their decisions precisely because of pricks like you. Smarter pricks than you.
You're 0-2 fuck face. And since this will be the caliber of your responses (totally off topic by the way), consider yourself tossed onto the failed gender-swap pile.
Make that 0-3 unless you have proof or a thread name that was pulled. Unlike you, I can post your posts where you have lied to prove a point.
How about I'll leave the forum if I can't and you leave if I can? Of course, if you're afraid.......
If you don't publically agree we'll just accept you for the lying cocksucker you are.
PS Since you're on ignore, have one of your bitches quote you so I'll know you agreed.
What focus you have. You can ignore 215 trump half true or less statements. To paraphrase Lou Reed, You plucked your eyebrows and then he (you) was a she (you) and the immortal, In the backroom, you are everybody's darling, you kept your head while you were giving head.
[/FONT] Originally Posted by Munchmasterman
are you drunk again??
bahahaaaaaa
.