OK - so if a person born in Mexico who becomes a US citizen, or if they were born in India or China and become US citizens, if they are more loyal to the country they were born in than the US, you want to shoot them? Originally Posted by Jewish LawyerShot or deported. Take your choice JL. I kinda like COG option too. I'd bet JD would think you sexy tarr'd and feathered!
- WTF
- 03-19-2014, 11:55 AM
- Jewish Lawyer
- 03-19-2014, 01:10 PM
- CJ7
- 03-19-2014, 01:16 PM
- WTF
- 03-19-2014, 01:21 PM
- Jewish Lawyer
- 03-19-2014, 02:32 PM
- IIFFOFRDB
- 03-19-2014, 04:26 PM
Obuckethead is the problem in the Ukraine.
http://townhall.com/columnists/scott...0774/page/full
The Costs of Barack Obama’s Weakness
Scottie Hughes | Mar 19, 2014
When George Mallory was asked in 1924 why he wanted to climb Mount Everest, he snapped, “Because it is there.” Fourteen years later, Adolf Hitler might well have given the same answer if asked why he wanted to annex the Sudetenland. And nearly a century later, Vladimir Putin is swallowing up Crimea for the same reason: Because it is there for taking. Putin knows when it comes to invading and annexing Crimea, no one is going to stop him.
Consider the three candidates you might think at first glance would stand in Vladimir Putin’s path. First, there’s Ukraine. But its military is no match for Moscow.
Second, there’s the European Union. But Western Europe’s anemic military budgets have taken a back seat to welfare spending in once-great nations that have said since World War II, “We’ll sit this one out; we gave at the office between 1939 and 1945.”
Third, there’s the United States. But it is led by the weakest, most feckless, least intimidating President in the history of the republic. As Russian dissident Garry Kasparov recently said, “Obama makes Jimmy Carter look like Winston Churchill.” Putin knows that Crimea is there for the taking because he knows Barack Obama would rather collect Nobel Peace Prizes than stand up for American allies and interests and values.
This weak excuse for a President isn’t about to “fight on the beaches”; he only fights in courtrooms defending Obamacare and on the stump excoriating wealth and success. He isn’t offering “blood, toil, tears, and sweat”; he’s only offering cheaper student loans and free birth control. He isn’t chomping on a cigar and praising his countrymen during their “finest hour”; he’s wearing mom jeans and apologizing for his countrymen to the rest of the world.
Whereas Vladimir Putin is a Cold Warrior, Barack Obama is a class warrior. When he declares that “we’re going to punish our enemies and we’re going to reward our friends,” the enemies he’s talking about are entrepreneurs with the audacity to think they actually built their business, and the friends he’s talking about are the adoring fans of this Celebrity in Chief. His style of warfare plays well among union leaders and community organizers, but it isn’t much help against KGB-agents-turned-lawless-dictators intent on territorial expansion.
Don’t get me wrong – I don’t want to go to war over Crimea. America shouldn’t be the world’s policeman. Instead, what I want is a president who projects strength. I want a president who understands that weakness provokes aggression. I want a president who doesn’t draw red lines he can’t back up; who protects our diplomats from terrorists in places like Benghazi; who invests in militarily-necessary projects and soldiers; who isn’t afraid to make a detainee stand on his feet for a few hours during an interrogation; and who doesn’t telegraph his spinelessness by flip-flopping for political reasons on everything from gay marriage to campaign matching funds to the individual mandate.
In his best imitation of a real leader, President Obama has vowed that “there will be costs” to Putin’s aggression in Crimea. I doubt it. But there are costs to American weakness. Sadly, the people of Crimea are paying those costs.
.
http://townhall.com/columnists/scott...0774/page/full
The Costs of Barack Obama’s Weakness
Scottie Hughes | Mar 19, 2014
When George Mallory was asked in 1924 why he wanted to climb Mount Everest, he snapped, “Because it is there.” Fourteen years later, Adolf Hitler might well have given the same answer if asked why he wanted to annex the Sudetenland. And nearly a century later, Vladimir Putin is swallowing up Crimea for the same reason: Because it is there for taking. Putin knows when it comes to invading and annexing Crimea, no one is going to stop him.
Consider the three candidates you might think at first glance would stand in Vladimir Putin’s path. First, there’s Ukraine. But its military is no match for Moscow.
Second, there’s the European Union. But Western Europe’s anemic military budgets have taken a back seat to welfare spending in once-great nations that have said since World War II, “We’ll sit this one out; we gave at the office between 1939 and 1945.”
Third, there’s the United States. But it is led by the weakest, most feckless, least intimidating President in the history of the republic. As Russian dissident Garry Kasparov recently said, “Obama makes Jimmy Carter look like Winston Churchill.” Putin knows that Crimea is there for the taking because he knows Barack Obama would rather collect Nobel Peace Prizes than stand up for American allies and interests and values.
This weak excuse for a President isn’t about to “fight on the beaches”; he only fights in courtrooms defending Obamacare and on the stump excoriating wealth and success. He isn’t offering “blood, toil, tears, and sweat”; he’s only offering cheaper student loans and free birth control. He isn’t chomping on a cigar and praising his countrymen during their “finest hour”; he’s wearing mom jeans and apologizing for his countrymen to the rest of the world.
Whereas Vladimir Putin is a Cold Warrior, Barack Obama is a class warrior. When he declares that “we’re going to punish our enemies and we’re going to reward our friends,” the enemies he’s talking about are entrepreneurs with the audacity to think they actually built their business, and the friends he’s talking about are the adoring fans of this Celebrity in Chief. His style of warfare plays well among union leaders and community organizers, but it isn’t much help against KGB-agents-turned-lawless-dictators intent on territorial expansion.
Don’t get me wrong – I don’t want to go to war over Crimea. America shouldn’t be the world’s policeman. Instead, what I want is a president who projects strength. I want a president who understands that weakness provokes aggression. I want a president who doesn’t draw red lines he can’t back up; who protects our diplomats from terrorists in places like Benghazi; who invests in militarily-necessary projects and soldiers; who isn’t afraid to make a detainee stand on his feet for a few hours during an interrogation; and who doesn’t telegraph his spinelessness by flip-flopping for political reasons on everything from gay marriage to campaign matching funds to the individual mandate.
In his best imitation of a real leader, President Obama has vowed that “there will be costs” to Putin’s aggression in Crimea. I doubt it. But there are costs to American weakness. Sadly, the people of Crimea are paying those costs.
.
- CuteOldGuy
- 03-20-2014, 12:16 AM
- lustylad
- 03-20-2014, 01:05 AM
If I was in charge people like him would be shot. If you put other countries interest above this country, Firing squad for you. Originally Posted by WTFNEW RULE from WTFascistidiot!
I have one question, fagboy. Who will define the US national interest? Will it be you, WTForeignpolicyneophyte? Odumbo?
Come to think of it, aren't you demanding the firing squad for Odumbo? After all, his pusillanimous foreign policy puts Russia's national interest ahead of ours...
- Jackie S
- 03-20-2014, 07:24 AM
Yeah. Deport them to their native land.By all accounts, North America was populated less than 20,000 years ago by people crossing the Bering Straight. So yes, send them back to Eastern Siberia where they came from.
Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy
The fact is, just about everybody is from someplace else. How far back do you want to go?
- i'va biggen
- 03-20-2014, 08:03 AM
How long does someone need to live somewhere before it is their native land? Personally I was born here it is my native land.
- WTF
- 03-20-2014, 09:24 AM
NEW RULE from WTFascistidiot!I will cocksucker. I gotta new rule....you wanna start a war, you or your children gotta go sign up to fight in it. We then tax the fuck outta the folks that want to fight it to actually pay for it.
I have one question, fagboy. Who will define the US national interest? Will it be you, WTForeignpolicyneophyte? Odumbo?
Come to think of it, aren't you demanding the firing squad for Odumbo? After all, his pusillanimous foreign policy puts Russia's national interest ahead of ours... Originally Posted by lustylad
When dipshits like you and JewishLawyer come on here in say you will put Israel's interest above the US, we are shipping your ass outta here.
- lustylad
- 03-22-2014, 02:28 AM
I will cocksucker. I gotta new rule....you wanna start a war, you or your children gotta go sign up to fight in it. We then tax the fuck outta the folks that want to fight it to actually pay for it.Hey tranny fagboy, you ain't even qualified to define the "national interest" of your boyfriend's anus after you lick it out. You prolly think eating breakfast at IHOP gives you foreign policy experience. Who said anything about starting a war?
When dipshits like you and JewishLawyer come on here in say you will put Israel's interest above the US, we are shipping your ass outta here. Originally Posted by WTF
I've got a better new rule. If Odumbo's ineptitude causes us to stumble into a war that could have been avoided with a little foresight and deft diplomacy, then libtards like you - the sheeple who blindly defend Mr. Red Line Eraser no matter how badly he fucks up - will do the fighting and pay the war taxes. Sound fair?
And by the way asshole, when did I ever "put Israel's interest above the US"? Got an example? Can you cite any of my posts? It never happened, fagboy, so stop making this stuff up. If you have any decency you will admit you are wrong, then kiss my ass and STFU.
- LexusLover
- 03-22-2014, 06:03 AM
Quote:
"Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If I was in charge people like him would be shot."
Isn't that spelled "wuz"?
"Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If I was in charge people like him would be shot."
Isn't that spelled "wuz"?
- LexusLover
- 03-22-2014, 06:05 AM
I will cocksucker. I gotta new rule....you wanna start a war, you or your children gotta go sign up to fight in it. We then tax the fuck outta the folks that want to fight it to actually pay for it. Originally Posted by WTFDoes your "new rule" apply to you? Or do you get an exemption?
A "new" novel: "An Army of One" ..."WTF on the Way to the Front"!
2016 is just around the corner ....
http://www.today.com/news/pope-franc...ama-2D79408674
- WTF
- 03-22-2014, 08:10 AM
You'd have to first take JewishLawyer's dick outta your ass for me to kiss it.
And by the way asshole, when did I ever "put Israel's interest above the US"? Got an example? Can you cite any of my posts? It never happened, fagboy, so stop making this stuff up. If you have any decency you will admit you are wrong, then kiss my ass and STFU. Originally Posted by lustylad
Quote:If I wuz in charge, you'd have to pay your proper Medicare insurance and quit pushing that expense off on others.
"Originally Posted by WTF View Post
If I was in charge people like him would be shot."
Isn't that spelled "wuz"? Originally Posted by LexusLover