Romney: POTUS candidate, dodging taxes through Swiss bank acc and Cayman Isl. investments.

Munchie, you twist everything Obama does to make him look like an angel of light. The intellectual gymnastics you perform are truly amazing to watch.

Obama could have fixed this before it got published. Even if the agent wrote it, they had to get the info from somewhere. Most likely . . . Obama?

Just retreat back to your fantasy world. You are obviously happier there.

What I wasted was my time. Trying to educate you.

Now you accuse him of claiming to have not been born in the US. This is a bullshit lie! And you'll never find a cite to substantiate your bullshit lie! http://www.eccie.net/showpost.php?p=...5&postcount=14 Furthermore, it establishes that you will continue to lie in order to cover the lies of your lying Messiah.

The name of the thread says it all.

You just have to love it. Obamas agent says he was born in Kenya.
http://www.eccie.net/showthread.php?t=451829

Go to this link so you know some of the facts.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Governm...donesia-Hawaii

To recap. Obama did not write the blurb. So says Odumbo and his agent who both have a financial interest in claiming it was only a 'mistake'. So says Odumbo and his agent who 'both' were supposed to review the bio prior to printing. So says Odumbo and his agent despite company policy stating otherwise.None of the people in the booklet wrote their own. Another bullshit lie. The booklet was a 15 year anniversary special edition. It was published once. 1 time, not 2 or 3 or 4 or etc.
That bio never appeared any place other than that booklet. The fact is, every individual who received or read the pamphlet was lied to. So the lie was perpetuated hundreds if not thousands of times.

How do you correct a booklet that is printed once? So now you are claiming it was impossible to correct and reprint the document, or use an errata sheet, before it was disseminated!?! By doing otherwise, Odumbo and his agent created a false and misleading image for sixteen years: a lie! It's easy. When someone asks about it, you correct the story they heard. You lie and misrepresent yourself in your business all the time, just like Odumbo did, don't you? BTW, when was the last time you were sued for misrepresentation? When asked in 2007, he corrected the story. It promoted a book he never published. So according to you I suppose that was a lie by Obama too.
Twist the facts into any scenario you want. You will anyways.

This time you were wrong....again. Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Munchie, Odumbo lied. That you would jump in his litter box and scurry and lie to cover his turds comes as no surprise.

Munchie, you twist everything Obama does to make him look like an angel of light. The intellectual gymnastics you perform are truly amazing to watch.

Obama could have fixed this before it got published. Even if the agent wrote it, they had to get the info from somewhere. Most likely . . . Obama?

Just retreat back to your fantasy world. You are obviously happier there. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

As usual you say something that misrepresents something else without examples or any shred of proof.
How about a single example of me making him look like an angel?
I see it as straightening. That's why as I refute you (straighten), I post links to show why I straightened your twisted claims which don't generally stand up.
Since I don't refute every post you make, that means I didn't read it, didn't find it worthy of reply, didn't feel like responding or even, do I dare say this, you may be rrrrrr, rrrrrii, rrrriiiiigg, right.

You make your arguments with me instead of the fact/links/etc. I post. When you refute me for presenting facts you don't/can't/won't refute you make me happy. Because all of your check-valves are getting ready to siphon. The thrill of seeing you wrong has greatly diminished. 8000+ posts says it all.
Sometimes I like to argue with you but you aren't very good at it. Refuting your facts is more fun because unlike you, they don't squeal like little girls as they are ruptured.

Don't strain yourself.Be sure to stretch before you engage in disingenuous gymnastics.

Munchie, Odumbo lied. That you would jump in his litter box and scurry and lie to cover his turds comes as no surprise. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Now you accuse him of claiming to have not been born in the US. This is a bullshit lie! And you'll never find a cite to substantiate your bullshit lie! Who needs a SITE to prove you wrong? You prove you wrong. You said he OKed the content and had a financial interest in perpetuating the lie he was born in Kenya. If he claims he was born in Kenya, that is claiming he was not born in the US. Right? Right.DUUHHH!

You have lied. You said he wrote this bio when he didn't.

This isn't about me, Obama, conservatives, liberals, or whores.

This is about u. b. getting caught again.

It's right there. Anyone can see it.

And like other creatures lacking a skeletal frame, you shoot ink out of your ass to cloud the water and to place your particular type of stench on everything and everyone as you desperately try to squirm through the shit to make your getaway.

There is no need for you to be here.

U. B. Boring

Don't strain yourself.Be sure to stretch before you engage in disingenuous gymnastics. Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

Fuck off.

You misused the word "site" again, Munchie. Do I need to go over that with you again?

Now you accuse him of claiming to have not been born in the US. This is a bullshit lie! And you'll never find a cite to substantiate your bullshit lie! Who needs a SITE to prove you wrong? You prove you wrong. You said he OKed the content and had a financial interest in perpetuating the lie he was born in Kenya. If he claims he was born in Kenya, that is claiming he was not born in the US. Right? Right.DUUHHH!

You have lied. You said he wrote this bio when he didn't.

This isn't about me, Obama, conservatives, liberals, or whores.

This is about u. b. getting caught again.

It's right there. Anyone can see it.

And like other creatures lacking a skeletal frame, you shoot ink out of your ass to cloud the water and to place your particular type of stench on everything and everyone as you desperately try to squirm through the shit to make your getaway.

There is no need for you to be here.

U. B. Boring Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Munchie, no matter how you twist the story, Odumo lied; Odumbo's agent lied, and you lied.

Munchie, no matter how you twist the story, Odumo lied; Odumbo's agent lied, and you lied. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

You try to expand your ink cloud.

So now everyone but you is a liar. When lies written by you, prove other lies written by you, to be lies. (and all the joy within you dies)
You call it twisting. Which of course you would since you are the proven liar here.

I placed a prominent example in my other post.
Your words two completely different ways. One has to be a lie and the other could be lying about lies. If your lies aren't twisting, what would you call your lies?


You and your ilk rely heavily on calling straightening out the lies you have complied to be twisting.

But no matter how many times you say what cog cooks up for you to say, you twist. That's what you do.

If we can deal with it, why can't you?

My work is done here. You are convicted by your own words. You are hoist with your own petard.

Strange, I alway thought you would be a leo-tard guy.

And now, I give the floor to the proven liar, who I'm sure will tell nothing but the truth now (nod, nod wink, wink).

Munchie, don't go away mad. Just go away.

Oh, and if you want to review the correct usage of the terms "cite" and "site" just let me know.

If it will help, I can make them different colors.

You try to expand your ink cloud.

So now everyone but you is a liar. When lies written by you, prove other lies written by you, to be lies. (and all the joy within you dies)
You call it twisting. Which of course you would since you are the proven liar here.

I placed a prominent example in my other post.
Your words two completely different ways. One has to be a lie and the other could be lying about lies. If your lies aren't twisting, what would you call your lies?


You and your ilk rely heavily on calling straightening out the lies you have complied to be twisting.

But no matter how many times you say what cog cooks up for you to say, you twist. That's what you do.

If we can deal with it, why can't you?

My work is done here. You are convicted by your own words. You are hoist with your own petard.

Strange, I alway thought you would be a leo-tard guy.

And now, I give the floor to the proven liar, who I'm sure will tell nothing but the truth now (nod, nod wink, wink). Originally Posted by Munchmasterman

Was a false biography for Odumbo published in a 1991 promotional pamphlet? Yes.

Was Odumbo -- as the 'author' being promoted -- responsible for the accuracy of the biography? Yes.

Did -- for sixteen years -- the false biography create a false or misleading impression (definition of a 'lie')? Yes.

Did Odumbo, et al, by not correcting the false and misleading impression in the pamphlet perpetuate a lie? Yes.

Odumbo lied. Odumbo's agent lied. And you are lying.

You misused the word "site" again, Munchie. Do I need to go over that with you again? Originally Posted by CuteOldGuy

You are wrong again. All 3 spellings could be used in that sentence especially since no reference to his spelling was used or reference that his usage was incorrect. Especially since I typed the sentence and I alone am the only person who knows how I intended it be used. You are the person who needs to review since you don't recognize correct usage.

Who needs a SITE (as in website), cite (as in quoting a liar's own words) sight (as in a premonition the liar will repeat his lies as sole source of their truthfulness) to prove you wrong? You prove you wrong.

How ironic. "You prove you wrong." applies to both of you!


Here is a quote from one of your posts.

Here is a cite to site.

http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/site


Since the cite is already sited, you couldn’t have meant that as it would be redundant. You must have meant “Here is a cite to “a” site.” Please explain this to me. What did you mean? How could it be correct using the words included? Thanks in advance for any light you can shed on this.

I'll take that as a "no".