Idiot Leftist of the Year

You posted exactly what I knew you would.

So it must be okay to post what people know you are going to post.

And everybody knows it. Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

i haven't ignored anything. you've ignored this ....
Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Yes I did. Because it was a no-start with your low factual, biased source(s) you consistently post.

You can have others respond to such.

The OP states he knew how this thread would go, but posted it anyway. So what is the real purpose behind posting it, copying and pasting material from a biased source ?

Perhaps he can advise about that.

Would only a right wing radical copy and paste something like this ?

Perhaps the OP can say so. Originally Posted by VitaMan

The biased website already chose it.

You're so transparent you don't even need a Windex man. Originally Posted by VitaMan

You posted exactly what I knew you would.

So it must be okay to post what people know you are going to post.

And everybody knows it. Originally Posted by VitaMan

Yup. DOA thread. Hopefully it gets clicks so as to steer a few pennies to this website.

Yup. DOA thread. Hopefully it gets clicks so as to steer a few pennies to this website. Originally Posted by Precious_b

and yet you are keeping it alive with every post.

do ya have anything to say about MSNBC the winner of the "Idiot Leftist" award?

i sometimes watch Rachel Madcow when i want to see what the radical left is spewing. and people think Tucker is "radical"


bahahahhaaaa

do ya have anything to say about MSNBC the winner of the "Idiot Leftist" award? Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

The "award" itself is utter garbage and made up by a biased website, townhall.com.
Again:

Townhall.com almost always incorporate highly opinionated or loaded language.

Many articles score poorly due to highly biased language and headlines, suggesting that articles aim to elicit an emotional response.

Townhall.com has a “Questionable” rating due to “consistent one-sided reporting that always favors the right. Articles used are those that exhibit extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.



The OP conveniently ignores all of the above, and just keeps requesting for more nominees for an award that was already given out by the biased website.

It sounds like all the OP wants to accomplish is promoting this award. That would put him in lock step with the biased website townhall.com...concluding he is a right wing radical that approves loaded language, and that is his only purpose for starting this thread.

And that is why he continues it.

The "award" itself is utter garbage and made up by a biased website, townhall.com.
Again:

Townhall.com almost always incorporate highly opinionated or loaded language.

Many articles score poorly due to highly biased language and headlines, suggesting that articles aim to elicit an emotional response.

Townhall.com has a “Questionable” rating due to “consistent one-sided reporting that always favors the right. Articles used are those that exhibit extreme bias, consistent promotion of propaganda/conspiracies, poor or no sourcing of credible information, a complete lack of transparency, and/or is fake news.



The OP conveniently ignores all of the above, and just keeps requesting for more nominees for an award that was already given out by the biased website.

It sounds like all the OP wants to accomplish is promoting this award. That would put him in lock step with the biased website townhall.com...concluding he is a right wing radical that approves loaded language, and that is his only purpose for starting this thread.

And that is why he continues it. Originally Posted by VitaMan

how questionable is MSNBC's rating? CNN? VOX? The HuffyPooPoo?


your own post means that every "opinion" piece by the various far left sources are what exactly? the same you claim this is? you all are making this too easy. try harder.

if you say so


but you are drifting now. I don't see a "copy and paste" post of far left sources on a topic that is utter garbage. You are now doing an odd version of "whataboutism" with your self on both sides.


Go ahead and "copy and paste" a far left source with articles on "Idiot Rightest of the Year".
You already "copy and pasted" a far right biased source article..



but you are still a valued poster

if you say so


but you are drifting now. I don't see a "copy and paste" post of far left sources on a topic that is utter garbage. You are now doing an odd version of "whataboutism" with your self on both sides.


but you are still a valued poster Originally Posted by VitaMan

if you say so

So you will be "copying and pasting" and posting an article from those far left sources you brought up ?

If not, that would prove you can't find any...by your own logic.

So you will be "copying and pasting" and posting an article from those far left sources you brought up ?


No


If not, that would prove you can't find any...by your own logic. Originally Posted by VitaMan

you want me to start a "Rachel MADCOW" thread? really?


bahahahahahahaaaaa


your whining about the source gives you away. when it's a source who's opinion you favor, it's legit. when it isn't it's "radical".


is the "winner" .. MSNBC in this thread far left or far right? what does you beloved "rating" tell you?

You have drifted off your own thread more than anyone else. Why is that ?

Perhaps you are "trying too hard" to justify your source you copied and pasted.

You have drifted off your own thread more than anyone else. Why is that ?

Perhaps you are "trying too hard". Originally Posted by VitaMan

still waiting for you to post on topic about the "Leftist Liberal Idiot of the Year"


MSNBC


happy new year .. almost


bahahahaa

and yet you are keeping it alive with every post.

... Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid

Yeah. Already stated why. You sure have an uncanny ability to ignore anything that goes counter to what you want out there. Just trying to get the click count up and help the bottom line on this site.

Yup. DOA thread. Hopefully it gets clicks so as to steer a few pennies to this website. Originally Posted by Precious_b

So you will be "copying and pasting" and posting an article from those far left sources you brought up ?

If not, that would prove you can't find any...by your own logic. Originally Posted by VitaMan

His logic is to find anything with the slimmist (sp) iota of truthfulness and readily turn his back on well founded, supported fact.

You intentionally ignored this.

A reminder




Those are from a site *you* say you trust.
So, you are either intentionally posting misleading, untruthful stuff (which leads to all your postings to be the same calibre) or you truly believe things that have no credibility to stand on their own over well documented facts. Originally Posted by Precious_b

His logic is to find anything with the slimmist (sp) iota of truthfulness and readily turn his back on well founded, supported fact. Originally Posted by Precious_b

if you say so

https://www.allsides.com/news-source/msnbc


llSides Media Bias Rating™: Left

• agree
• disagree

365 Shares

The bias meter value for MSNBC is -4. -6 is the furthest "Left" value and 6 is the furthest "Right" value.
-4


[COLOR=var(--left)]Left[/COLOR] What does this mean? AllSides Media Bias Meter™
How we determined this rating:

• Community Feedback: 30,196 ratings
• AllSides has medium confidence in this bias rating.

Unless otherwise noted, this bias rating refers only to online news coverage, not TV, print, or radio content.
Learn about our bias rating methods
MSNBC Bias Rating Left Type News Media Region National Owner NBCUniversal Established 1996 Website msnbc.com Twitter @MSNBC Facebook msnbc Wikipedia MSNBC Go to MSNBC No Paywall