Roy Moore Was Banned From A Mall In The 80's For Repeatedly Harassing Teenage Girls

Wanting to date girls that young for a guy in his early thirties is definitely inappropriate or creepy. What's just as creepy is lot of people knew he liked these high school aged girls and they weren't all that concerned about it until now.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

True dat.

http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017...ivorce-action/

BREAKING: Accuser LIED About Having No Contact With Roy Moore After Alleged Sexual Assault — JUDGE MOORE DISMISSED HER DIVORCE ACTION!

November 15, 2017 by Joshua Caplan

An attorney for GOP Alabama Senate candidate Judge Roy Moore revealed Gloria Allred accuser Beverly Young Nelson lied when she said no contact had been made between the Judge and herself following the alleged sexual advancement in 1977.

In fact, Judge Moore dismissed a divorce action brought by Nelson against her husband in 1999.

“[Nelson & Gloria Allred] said that Ms. Nelson after the allegations had never seen or had any contact with Judge Moore… In 1999, Ms. Nelson filed a divorce action… The judge assigned was Roy S. Moore,” said Roy Moore’s Attorney.


Roy Moore's Attorney: "[Nelson & Gloria Allred] said that Ms. Nelson after the allegations had never seen or had any contact with Judge Moore... In 1999, Ms. Nelson filed a divorce action... The judge assigned was Roy S. Moore."
4:06 PM - Nov 15, 2017

Nelson, 56, held a press conference in New York with embattled attorney Gloria Allred on Monday, alleging Judge Roy Moore sexually harassed her when she was 16 years old.

According to Beverly Young Nelson’s account reported by the Washington Examiner, “Moore offered to drive her home from work one night but instead parked in a “dark, deserted” part of a parking lot behind the restaurant where she worked. Nelson said Moore groped her and “began squeezing my neck attempting to force my head onto his crotch.”

Wanting to date girls that young for a guy in his early thirties is definitely inappropriate or creepy. What's just as creepy is lot of people knew he liked these high school aged girls and they weren't all that concerned about it until now.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

"Guilty" of dating consenting, of age young women is not a crime. You might consider it "creepy", but Anna Nicole Smith had no qualms about dating a man 60 years older than herself.

The handwriting in the signature and the message were obviously written by at least two different people in the yearbook, and the accuser's own stepson is calling her a liar. Rumors, innuendo and "unnamed sources" do not constitute concrete evidence of sexual assault or rape, and there is every indication this is a political hit-job. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

the issue here is a difference in community standards from one state to another.

what's acceptable in one community may not be acceptable in another community as in the case with everyone outside Alabama being against roy moore.

Wanting to date girls that young for a guy in his early thirties is definitely inappropriate or creepy. What's just as creepy is lot of people knew he liked these high school aged girls and they weren't all that concerned about it until now.

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

Other than accusations, how do you know he dated teens?

Other than accusations, how do you know he dated teens? Originally Posted by garhkal

everyone in the town Moore lived knew about it.

It was kinda of strange to hear about this.

it was something that was not a big deal back with them in those days which is why the stories never made prominence when he ran as republican.

Other than accusations, how do you know he dated teens? Originally Posted by garhkal

Well ya know, that's a valid point because there really hasn't been much evidence presented to substantiate these accusations. But unfortunately regardless once the public forms a negative opinion against a politician you're branded guilty.

Jim

The Pedo's and Pedo supporters in this thread are spinning outta control.

The Pedo's and Pedo supporters in this thread are spinning outta control. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

So are the Lynchers like you!

I suppose if you got accused of rape and the unmentionable on here you would want all of your "due process" rights and be angry that someone spread the unsupported accusations on the internet and ECCIE!

But Double Standards are your "fare" aren't they?

So the alleged victim of his sexual assault of 40 years ago forgot she filed her divorce case in Moore's court about 20 years ago, and that he dismissed her divorce case. (Was that because she couldn't prove her divorce either?)

Let's see what the forensic folks say about the yearbook forgery with respect to the signature that is the same as the signature on the order signed dismissing her divorce that was SIGNED BY HIS COURTROOM ASSISTANT!

Up to 8 now.

http://abcnews.go.com/US/roy-moores-...ry?id=51138718

thing is, the yearbook signature is an obvious fraud, but Moore's Campaign Manager ignored the original 4 accusers in his statement.. the yearbook Bitch may be looking for a pay day or publicity, but that doesn't negate the other 4.

one can not ignore the timing of this, and the Hollywood (and more) sexual harassment explosion of recent weeks.. how convenient is it, to lump Moore into current events, with a strategy of unprovable slandering dating back 40 years?

still, I find it implausible that an orchestrated campaign could net 8 women (so far) with allegations.

the issue here is a difference in community standards from one state to another.

what's acceptable in one community may not be acceptable in another community as in the case with everyone outside Alabama being against roy moore. Originally Posted by dilbert firestorm

Well, Alabama is the state where Moore is campaigning to be a senator.

The Pedo's and Pedo supporters in this thread are spinning outta control. Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

Most in this forum won't be voting either for or against Judge Moore, Shit-stained Chapped-ass. Meanwhile, Shit-stained Chapped-ass, how many times did you vote for Jeffrey Epstein's friend and consort, Slick Willie the Perjuring Sexual Predator and his enabling bitch, hildebeest?

thing is, the yearbook signature is an obvious fraud, but Moore's Campaign Manager ignored the original 4 accusers in his statement.. the yearbook Bitch may be looking for a pay day or publicity, but that doesn't negate the other 4.

one can not ignore the timing of this, and the Hollywood (and more) sexual harassment explosion of recent weeks.. how convenient is it, to lump Moore into current events, with a strategy of unprovable slandering dating back 40 years?

still, I find it implausible that an orchestrated campaign could net 8 women (so far) with allegations. Originally Posted by Chung Tran

Yeah, Moore did address those other women. In his written statement to Hannity, Moore wrote:

"I adamantly deny the allegations of Leigh Corfman and Beverly Nelson, did not date underage girls, and have taken steps to begin a civil action for defamation."

Hence, Moore did address all of his accusers: the two accusing him of assault and the others who, of age by Alabama law, admit they consensually went on a date with Moore.

WITCH HUNT =pay day, the libertart media at it again, Serendipitously right after the Hollywood stories?

So are the Lynchers like you!

I suppose if you got accused of rape and the unmentionable on here you would want all of your "due process" rights and be angry that someone spread the unsupported accusations on the internet and ECCIE!

But Double Standards are your "fare" aren't they?

So the alleged victim of his sexual assault of 40 years ago forgot she filed her divorce case in Moore's court about 20 years ago, and that he dismissed her divorce case. (Was that because she couldn't prove her divorce either?)

Let's see what the forensic folks say about the yearbook forgery with respect to the signature that is the same as the signature on the order signed dismissing her divorce that was SIGNED BY HIS COURTROOM ASSISTANT! Originally Posted by LexusLover

You're reading fake news. and for the record did Emmett Till deserve due process?

A dim-retard actually being prosecuted for more than Moore is being accused of, and yet, there he is, still sitting in the Senate.

Sen. Robert Menendez may have had sex with ***forbidden subject*** hookers in Dominican Republic: prosecutors

The New York Daily News

You're reading fake news.... Originally Posted by Sistine Chapel

... and you know this how?

Your "news" is always fake!

Just for starters ... when I saw "D.A." I had good reason to believe an assistant district attorney would not sign a document "D.A." only an ignorant goofball like you would.

Next thing you'll be claiming he snuck into her home, found her yearbook, and signed it back then ..... or was she so offended by his "sexual assault" that she stalked him with the yearbook to sign so she could remember who "sexually assaulted" her! After all she was distraught and ashamed ... isn't that what AllWrong, her attorney claims?

Of course one doesn't get a "yearbook" for a GED, so you wouldn't know much about how that works, now would you? Or did you even bother with getting a GED?