Rand Corporation Report Says the Iraq War Was Shrubbie's Biggest Blunder

In a risk vs. rewards scenario, the risk of losing 4500+ American lives was not worth Saddam's life. Had your favorite Shrub maintained his focus upon the perpetrators of 9/11, the potential reward (at the time) to the US of OBL's life and/or a dagger in al Qaeda's heart was much greater than that of Saddam's life, especially when you factor in what proved to be a prolonged war in Iraq. Originally Posted by bigtex

There may be an intelligent case to be made against the Iraq war, but you are obviously too stupid to make it. If it was a strategic mistake to remove Saddam, the costs are irrelevant. If it was a mistake, would it be any less of a mistake had we only lost 300 American lives (as in the 1991 Gulf War)? You imply that getting rid of Saddam was a proper and worthy strategic goal, provided it didn't cost us much. So all-wise & all-knowing littledix, at what point did it become a "mistake of historic proportions"? When we lost 500 lives? 2,000 lives? 4,000 lives? You obviously know how to pinpoint these things, right?

Your argument about Iraq causing us to lose focus on al queda is unconvincing. Why couldn't we do both - remove Saddam and eliminate OBL? Between 2003-2008, Bush did a pretty good job of decimating (if not decapitating) al queda at the same time we were in Iraq. What more should he have done? Should we have invaded Pakistan (in pursuit of bin laden) instead of Iraq? Would that have been a wise strategic move? I don't think so.

Like a limp little dick, you completely duck the question of whether the far greater human and financial costs of WW2 were worth incurring.

.

Had you actually read the two posts, it should have been quite obvious. Instead, you jumped to a false conclusion. Originally Posted by bigtex

So posts the King of Leaping to False Conclusions, with 20-20 hindsight.

Your propensity to call anyone who disagrees with you an "idiot" is well known, and well documented. Perhaps you actually believe your repetition of the name-calling in broken record fashion enhances your self-perceived intellectual superiority .. and others will actually think you more credible as you rewrite history.

No wonder you voted for Obaminable twice! And you call me an "idiot"?

As YOUR MAN announces racial discontent has improved on his watch:



And he has defeated terrorism .....



Those damn videos ....

Between 2003-2008, Bush did a pretty good job of decimating (if not decapitating) al queda at the same time we were in Iraq. Originally Posted by lustylad

1) There was no reason for us to invade Iraq during the spring of 2003.
2) Why? Because Iraq was not a threat to our national security.
3) Shrubby did a piss poor job of (decimating, if not decapitating) al Qaeda in the days, weeks and months, before and after the Iraq invasion.
4) Shrubby did a damn good job of losing focus upon the perpetrator's of 9/11 when he decided to invade Iraq in 2003.
5) if you have a problem with the above, contact the Rand Corporation. (Or did you even read the attachment?)
6) Idiot!

Your propensity to call anyone who disagrees with you an "idiot" is well known, and well documented. Originally Posted by LexusLover

The only reason that I call you an Idiot is because you are one.

Hopefully, you and the rest of your Klan, errrr Clan, will wear the label proudly,.

Idiot!

No one would know more about chicken plucking than a peter puffer with a chicken dick. Fact. Peter puffer hankering is a chicken dick plucking champ.. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

How long does it take for a peerless plucking chicken dick plucker such as yourself to pick a peck of chicken peckers, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp?

OK this one is in the shitter as well....

IBIdiot has made it about chicken dicks again.

Could be worse. It could have been jiz...

OK this one is in the shitter as well....

IBIdiot has made it about chicken dicks again.

Could be worse. It could have been jiz... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

As the literate with no comprehension problems can plainly see, you Hitler worshipping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, that would be your number 2 reach around buddy from Kansas: the peerless plucking chicken dick plucker -- Eatkum the Inbred Chimp.

Again chicken dick advocates for a never ending war. You can train 'em, but you can't make them fight. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

How long does it take for a peerless plucking chicken dick plucker such as yourself to pick a peck of chicken peckers, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp? Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Asked and answered fuck off chicken dick the peter puffer.

As the literate with no comprehension problems can plainly see, you Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM, that would be your number 2 reach around buddy from Kansas: the peerless plucking chicken dick plucker -- Eatkum the Inbred Chimp. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

It fits you too a T chicken dick the peter puffer. #1 runner up in the DOTY award, and second class chicken plucking champ. .

Asked and answered fuck off chicken dick the peter puffer. Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Answer the question, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp, "How long does it take for a peerless plucking chicken dick plucker such as yourself to pick a peck of chicken peckers?"

It fits you too a T chicken dick the peter puffer. #1 runner up in the DOTY award, and second class chicken plucking champ. . Originally Posted by i'va biggen

Being the peerless plucking chicken dick plucker you are, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp, you're too stupid to realize the Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM saved you from being #1.

Answer the question, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp, "How long does it take for a peerless plucking chicken dick plucker such as yourself to pick a peck of chicken peckers?"

Asked and answered you stupid fuck

Being the peerless plucking chicken dick plucker you are, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp, you're too stupid to realize the Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM saved you from being #1. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

LMAO you are the first runner up should have been a run off, but your reach around buddy dull knife saved your ass. I see you are enthralled with the handle chicken dick it fits you and your second class plucking ways.

1) There was no reason for us to invade Iraq during the spring of 2003.
2) Why? Because Iraq was not a threat to our national security.
3) Shrubby did a piss poor job of (decimating, if not decapitating) al Qaeda in the days, weeks and months, before and after the Iraq invasion.
4) Shrubby did a damn good job of losing focus upon the perpetrator's of 9/11 when he decided to invade Iraq in 2003.
5) if you have a problem with the above, contact the Rand Corporation. (Or did you even read the attachment?)
6) Idiot! Originally Posted by bigtex

It's too bad you didn't pick up the phone and call him in February 2003.

I'm sure he would have listened to your 20-20 hindsight BEFORE the invasion.

Like I asked:
Are you always correct on Monday morning with Sunday's scores?

Being the peerless plucking chicken dick plucker you are, Eatkum the Inbred Chimp, you're too stupid to realize the Hitler worshiping, lying, hypocritical, racist, cum-gobbling golem fucktard, HDDB, DEM saved you from being #1. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

Actually, your fellow styrofoam packing peanuts in the Idiot Klan, err, Clan, saved you from sweeping to yet another victory as DOTY.

I know it's algebra, which is the work of the devil to you anti-education Neanderthals, but take away the automatic "me" votes by your cell mates and you win it GOING AWAY.

So for a change, IBIDiot, you're LYING!

There may be an intelligent case to be made against the Iraq war, but you are obviously too stupid to make it.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

Do you think removing a major counterbalance to Iran in the region was intelligent?

It was if your company stood to pocket billions...

It was if your company stood to pocket billions... Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

You are correct , it was an intelligent war if you profited from it. So for a small % of Americans it was a intelligent war. For the vast majority it was costly and did not achieve the desired results.