Originally Posted by Lust4xxxLife
Fawn - here's my $0.02. Unlike many of the posts here, it's based on experience, not just empty pontification.
If you're ready to leave, you can. But you need to understand what 'leave' means. It means leave, not just stop doing what you do for money. You can't keep going to socials. You can't go to the lunches. You can't keep the same number and keep texting with this community. You can't pop into chat. You need to go. Leave means LEAVE. You have to COMMIT to someone else over this hobby community and there is no half-commit. Same for your other half.
See honey, unlike most of you here....I know what a commitment means...I was married for 21yrs faithful years....and never cheated or never ran when a problem arouse in my marriage...So ya I think I know that when I totally give myself to a man for a life time commitment it will only be to him....God some of you men seem to amaze me in the way you see us....You haven't a clue to whom some of us really are as a person.....
If either of you can't commit to leaving as I describe it, you'll be back. Only a matter of time and it won't be a long time, in my opinion.
Well like you said this is your opinion....How can you make that assumption when you don't even know us as person.....
I wish you the best...
L4L
This is exactly why I asked the men this very question about can a man/hobbyist truly and unconditionally love a provider....Or will they always see you in that light....haha I guess I got your answer on this situation Lust4xxxlife....
And I thank you for your thought because that is what I was looking for....
Originally Posted by fawn
Hey – ouch! I know nothing about the people here in real life, nor do they know anything about me. And I never said that I did. But you did ask for opinions...
When I used the word 'you', it was the proverbial 'you' because you posed the question. If you exchange 'a person' for the word 'you', maybe that will help make my point clearer.
When I used the word 'commit', I didn't mean it as 'commit to a person' (faithful), I meant it as 'commit to a decision'.
Allow me to use a metaphor to more clearly express my point. I view a providers relationship with the hobby in much the same way as I view my SO's past relationships. Sex is involved (who cares, unless you're seeking a virgin) and the past relationships are part of what shaped that person into the person you're attracted to – and the person who is attracted to you.
So, do I think a provider's history is any way a barrier against
"truly trusting and loving her unconditionally and making a marriage or
relationship work..."? No, I do not think that. History is history. I can only speak for myself and I'm sure some uptight guys might feel differently, but it wouldn't be a problem for me. At all.
However, if my SO was still hanging around with her ex-boyfriends/ex-husbands all the time, yes, that would be an issue for me. It wouldn't make me doubt that she was committed to me and faithful, but I would likely view it as a sign that she wasn't ready to let go of those past relationships and move forward with ME. Similarly, if a provider was still immersed in everything about the hobby except the actual acts, that would be an issue for me. It would make me wonder if she chose me over the hobby – or me over the hobby
for a while. I'm sure there are guys who think differently, but this is how I would feel and you did ask.
So – in my opinion – and based on my own relationships and observations, it's not about the past – that's behind us – it's about focus and mental/emotional commitment moving forward.
I'm only a data point of one. Please feel free to consider or reject the input as you like.
L4L