Many many girls let guys cum in their mouths not because they actually like it-contrary to what they say in public but not in private-because they think they won't make money if they don't do it.You asked the question, don't get mad at me for offering a possible answer.
I've never offered CIM yet my business is great.
So I guess if Mr. Wonderful's "wild, yet basically mild" fantasy is BBFS, and I have been paid to "accomodate" him....the provider should do that too????
And please please don't start with the "but BBFS is dangerous!!" stuff, because having semen flooding your mouth puts you in the same danger as CIM. Originally Posted by Sweet Heather
For the record BBFS and CIM or worlds apart, and there are probably a dozen or so threads on here where folks from both sides of the argument offer their various clinical proof. I think you are making a huge leap and doing a bit of absurb reductum when you suggest BBFS and BBBJ are the same thing. I certainly don't think you could qualify BBFS it as a "mild fantasy" and would appreciate it if you would not skew my logic to justify your position. Please don't twist the words around for your convenience.
You were asking about the ICK factor--snot I believe somebody called it--and why would anyone do that.
Just because you preference is not to do it, it does not give you carte blanc to attack the business model of the ladies that do believe it is a valid marketing plan. I am sure they don't like being critiqued on their marketing choices anymore than you do.
You can of course argue all you want that you don't need to do it. That is your choice and may you and your clients always be happy. However, trying to assert the idea that the current trend in the market does not in deed demand BBBJ is just idiotic and myopic. The math just does not support you.