And in those 16 posts, I never mentioned once that 'nobody cares'. Find that quote in this thread where I said that. He shifted the thread once it became clear that the NYT story was a huge fuckup, which he ADMITTED in this thread. So he starts a thread based on a story that he now admits was bungled and when that shit blows up, he shifts it to her popularity. You don't get to slither out of this one, cocksucker. You're shifty, but not shifty enough. Nice try, gonad.But one of your lib-retarded butt buddies did make that comment, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas; hence, his comment was addressed.
Here you are admitting that the very story you based your thread on was hastily published. This is after it blew up in your face and you had no choice but to admit the obvious.
"It was the NYT that "hastily" published the original and correct story, and it has now chosen to kowtow to Hildabeast, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas, but that doesn't change the fact that the Inspector General has already identified the criminal offense, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas." Originally Posted by WombRaider
...no one cares. Originally Posted by southtown4488
BTW, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas:
The Justice Department had originally said it was a criminal referral...
So, don't give up your day job sucking cocks, you "#Grubered", freelance faggot, Odumbo Minion from Arkansas.
In a new [NYT] article on Saturday, about four emails on Clinton's private server "that contained government secrets," the Times also provided a lengthy explanation for the language.
"The discovery of the four emails prompted [the Intelligence Community Inspector General] to refer the matter to FBI counterintelligence agents, who investigate crimes related to the mishandling of classified information," the article reads. "On Thursday night and again Friday morning, the Justice Department referred to the matter as a 'criminal referral' but later Friday dropped the word 'criminal.' The inspectors general said late Friday that it was a 'security referral' intended to alert authorities that 'classified information may exist on at least one private server and thumb drive that are not in the government’s possession.'"
"Irrespective of the terminology, the referral raises the possibility of a Justice Department investigation into Hildabeast’s emails as she campaigns for president," the report continues. "Mishandling classified information is a crime. Justice Department officials said no decision had been made about whether to open a criminal investigation" (Politico).