hahaha, angry little cunts aren't you. At this point four years ago there was no discussion of a brokered convention. . . but they have discussed it now. whats the main difference? oh yea, Trump is leading and his lead is growing.Actually, you are wrong. Eight years ago (it's a straw horse to focus on 2012) Hillary was the presumptive heir to the thrown. When she lost in Iowa, won in New Hampshire, and lost in South Carolina there was all kinds of talk of a brokered convention but Hillary thought she had an ace in the hole; super delegates
You cunts can deny it if you want but its obvious, if Trumps lead holds and he has more states, more popular votes and more delegates than any other candidate, the Republican party will push the other candidates to stay in the race that way they can hand the nomination to someone like Rubio or Bush. Originally Posted by southtown4488
who would do her bidding. So by talking about a very specific time and place, you lied.
That would be liberal argument tactic number seven.