I like both Jackie and Silly Girl; however, I would never call either of them because they have made absolute statements that they require knowing the true -outside of the hobby- identity of a client. That is OK for them, and I understand their concerns. So respect the rules of the house.
Originally Posted by JRLawrence
I really do like you too, JR, (at least "who" you are online, since we have never met) and I have enjoyed our discussions both in various threads and via PM.
I would like to point out, however (and it is something I have expressed to you directly previously), that if a potential client uses an alternative screening service (such as P411, etc.) that has already confirmed their identity and if they are well referenced by other ladies with said service, that aside from a quick glance at a photo ID so I can be relatively assured that they are who they proclaim to be with the service, that I have no need to collect or have knowledge of their identity past that cursory glance. I don't have a photographic memory and I certainly don't look at an ID long enough to know where you live nor do I care - I don't collect personal information in that instance - in fact, I don't collect it in some other instances either,
but you've refused to offer references.
Any reference. You don't even have a single review posted here . . . And, I will not go behind closed doors with ANYONE that refuses to show me some form of identification that reasonably assures me
they are who they say they are . . . and there are a vast many Escorts and providers that feel the same.
In fact, the "provider guidelines" at P411 actually recommend confirming a client's identity by doing exactly as I have outlined, which is why a P411 client ID is "built" the way it is, with the client's date of birth available to be confirmed by a valid legal document . . . In some parts of the country there are ladies that will lock a gentleman out of an appointment if they don't produce a driver's license at the door. I don't go quite that far, but I will want to make sure you haven't borrowed or bought a P411 account . . . which happens, infrequently - but, it does happen (Gina is awesome about shutting it down and in catching it).
I just thought I would point out, for the sake of fairness, that I do not require knowing the "true -outside of the hobby- identity of a client" in
every instance. However, in the instance of having not one previous reference, yes, I may confirm a potential client's identity using various methods. Those without previous experiences usually don't mind . . those that simply refuse to offer references sometimes have something to hide (that isn't directed at you). If I did require one's "true identity" (to be somehow recorded) in every instance, well, I wouldn't have many of the wonderful clients that I do - but, I can CONFIDENTLY say that I don't currently have one single client that would shive a git if I knew their full name, their wife's name, their children's name(s), where they lived, where they worked, etc. - becasue they KNOW that even if I do know, I've
never revealed or violated a client confidence, ever. I get paid very well to be discreet and keep secrets. My clients have taken steps with me (and one of those steps is verification / screening) to ensure that we have trust and an understanding - and they trust me (becasue they can - becasue I am
trustworthy) in return.
Kisses,
- Jackie