AOC's Mom moved out of New York because........

adav8s28's Avatar
She is in it esplainin' herself.

https://youtu.be/owMvz-0x-Sc Originally Posted by Sig9er
Good Video. From bartender to Congresswoman, not a bad position change for AOC. I did not catch where Bernstein said they were funded by Soros. The progressives are like the Tea Party for the republicans. The tea party never got control of the republican party and the progressives won't get control of the democratic party. The democratic party is mostly Clinton/Kennedy democrats. I do believe that the Federal Minimum wage needs to be higher than $7.25. It has been at that number since 2009. I don't think it needs to be $15/hr but certainly higher than $7.25.
bambino's Avatar
Good Video. From bartender to Congresswoman, not a bad position change for AOC. I did not catch where Bernstein said they were funded by Soros. The progressives are like the Tea Party for the republicans. The tea party never got control of the republican party and the progressives won't get control of the democratic party. The democratic party is mostly Clinton/Kennedy democrats. I do believe that the Federal Minimum wage needs to be higher than $7.25. It has been at that number since 2009. I don't think it needs to be $15/hr but certainly higher than $7.25. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Kennedy cut taxes, Clinton said the era of big government is over. Those days are long gone. You don’t know your stuff.
Good Video. From bartender to Congresswoman, not a bad position change for AOC. I did not catch where Bernstein said they were funded by Soros. The progressives are like the Tea Party for the republicans. The tea party never got control of the republican party and the progressives won't get control of the democratic party. The democratic party is mostly Clinton/Kennedy democrats. I do believe that the Federal Minimum wage needs to be higher than $7.25. It has been at that number since 2009. I don't think it needs to be $15/hr but certainly higher than $7.25. Originally Posted by adav8s28
With all due respect, I think you are living in a fantasy world if you think the Democrat Party is still the Party of Kennedy/Clinton.

Here's why. You have have a whole new voting block, millions of them, who are in the 18 to 30 year old age bracket. Multitudes of these new voters have lived a "Socialist Lifestyle" with mommy and daddy giving them just about everything. Multitudes still live at home. Many have educations in worthless degrees that will land a job that barely pays the rent.

The New Democrats, the likes of AOC, are promising them the same deal, just substituting the Democrat Party for mommy and daddy. They still don't have to lift a finger to do anything of substance. They Democrat Party will give them everything.

The Democrat Party won't nag them like mommy and daddy. "Get out of bed, clean this pig sty up, take a bath, put the Game Box controle down, get a job".

No, all the Democrat Party requires of them is they push that "D" on Election Day.
Yssup Rider's Avatar
So now we hear from the RWWs that the Democrats aren’t the same party as Kennedy or Clinton, yet the Republicans are the party of Lincoln.

Figure it out boys.
bambino's Avatar
So now we hear from the RWWs that the Democrats aren’t the same party as Kennedy or Clinton, yet the Republicans are the party of Lincoln.

Figure it out boys. Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Same principles. Trump is creating jobs and opportunities for AAs. Democrats want to keep them on welfare and on their plantation. All figured out.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yssup Rider's Avatar
Same principles. Trump is creating jobs and opportunities for AAs. Democrats want to keep them on welfare and on their plantation. All figured out.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino
That’s another of your lies, bambino.

How does the Democratic Party want to keep African Americans on welfare?

Explain which Democrats are plantation owners?

Your eyes are brown, buddy,
bambino's Avatar
That’s another of your lies, bambino.

How does the Democratic Party want to keep African Americans on welfare?

Explain which Democrats are plantation owners?

Your eyes are brown, buddy, Originally Posted by Yssup Rider
Your eyes are brown. Lowest AA unemployment rate in history. Raising wages. He also signed the Second Chance act. Clinton ended “welfare as we know it”. Obama brought it back. And what exactly did Obama do to help AAs other than give aways? Run along now.

https://www.ajc.com/news/opinion/opi...que2K/amp.html

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
bamscram's Avatar
Same principles. Trump is creating jobs and opportunities for AAs. Democrats want to keep them on welfare and on their plantation. All figured out.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA Originally Posted by bambino



20,000 new jobs when 180,000 were expected this quarter.
bambino's Avatar
20,000 new jobs when 180,000 were expected this quarter. Originally Posted by bamscram
But unemployment still went down and wages went up. More people with jobs in history. 3% annual GDP. The economy is great by any measure. Run along Lenny.
  • Tiny
  • 03-09-2019, 10:01 AM
Here's why. You have have a whole new voting block, millions of them, who are in the 18 to 30 year old age bracket. Multitudes of these new voters have lived a "Socialist Lifestyle" with mommy and daddy giving them just about everything. Multitudes still live at home. Many have educations in worthless degrees that will land a job that barely pays the rent.

The New Democrats, the likes of AOC, are promising them the same deal, just substituting the Democrat Party for mommy and daddy. They still don't have to lift a finger to do anything of substance. They Democrat Party will give them everything.

The Democrat Party won't nag them like mommy and daddy. "Get out of bed, clean this pig sty up, take a bath, put the Game Box controle down, get a job". Originally Posted by Jackie S
Very well said. This scares the shit out of me, seriously. Millennials are going to replace the baby boomers as the group of voters that controls the USA. It makes sense to look for an alternative, another country to move to, before that happens, if your economic and personal situation permits you to do that.

I wish adav8s28 were right, that people like John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton would lead the Democratic Party going forward. With all major Democratic presidential candidates signing onto the New Green Deal and with people like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders gaining more and more traction, signs are not good.
adav8s28's Avatar
Same principles. Trump is creating jobs and opportunities
Originally Posted by bambino
Job creation by president. In this list Clinton is ranked 1st, Obama is ranked 6th and Trump is ranked 13th. You don't know your stuff Bam.


https://www.thebalance.com/job-creat...ercent-3863218
adav8s28's Avatar
Here's why. You have have a whole new voting block, millions of them, who are in the 18 to 30 year old age bracket. Multitudes of these new voters have lived a "Socialist Lifestyle" with mommy and daddy giving them just about everything. Multitudes still live at home. Many have educations in worthless degrees that will land a job that barely pays the rent.

The New Democrats, the likes of AOC, are promising them the same deal, just substituting the Democrat Party for mommy and daddy. They still don't have to lift a finger to do anything of substance. They Democrat Party will give them everything.

The Democrat Party won't nag them like mommy and daddy. "Get out of bed, clean this pig sty up, take a bath, put the Game Box controle down, get a job".
Originally Posted by Jackie S
Jackie, there may be a number of people who fall into this category that you have described. When you say millions of them, I think that is overstated. You're saying there are millions of people between the ages of 18 - 30 living at home unemployed. The unemployment rate is 3.5%. Under Obama it went from 10 - 5. If the unemployment rate is 3.5% then there aren't that many people collecting an unemployment check. The numbers don't synch up.
themystic's Avatar
Jackie, there may be a number of people who fall into this category that you have described. When you say millions of them, I think that is overstated. You're saying there are millions of people between the ages of 18 - 30 living at home unemployed. The unemployment rate is 3.5%. Under Obama it went from 10 - 5. If the unemployment rate is 3.5% then there aren't that many people collecting an unemployment check. The numbers don't synch up. Originally Posted by adav8s28
Trump has just rode Obamas coattails on the economy. He will fuck it up sooner or later. Hes only at half time and things keep getting worse and worse. Worse part is hes a Traitor and well...so are his followers
themystic's Avatar
Very well said. This scares the shit out of me, seriously. Millennials are going to replace the baby boomers as the group of voters that controls the USA. It makes sense to look for an alternative, another country to move to, before that happens, if your economic and personal situation permits you to do that.

I wish adav8s28 were right, that people like John F. Kennedy and Bill Clinton would lead the Democratic Party going forward. With all major Democratic presidential candidates signing onto the New Green Deal and with people like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez, Elizabeth Warren and Bernie Sanders gaining more and more traction, signs are not good. Originally Posted by Tiny
Bad parenting from the right win loons. Ill take a left wing kook over a right wing Dictator any day of the week
Cuomo and deBlasio are weak. They gave away more than necessary to beat out dozens of other cities. Originally Posted by lustylad
Really?!


https://www.publicsource.org/pittsbu...-bid-released/