NCNS: SensualShayla NCNS Waste of time

I don't have a dog in this fight but there are flaws that I see with allowing NCNS postings to be valued as credible reviews. Don't get me wrong, I want to know about a NCNS prone provider just like the next guy so I can avoid wasting my time, but not at the expense of a provider who doesn't deserve such negativity. Examples of some potential issues in having NCNS threads being treated as reviews:

- If a guy simply had it in for a certain provider, he could post an untrue NCNS "review" and damage the providers reputation.

- What if there was a mix up? Not all appointments are confirmed to the degree that a mature hobbyist and provider might confirm them.

- What if something happens in the area that simply makes the provider feel uncomfortable and she therefore bails on the appointment and goes UTR for a short period of time?

I would dare say that most hobbyists who have been in the hobby for a long time have been stood up. I know that I have (and by some very respected providers over the years) and it is very frustrating.

Now let's all blow off some steam and go get laid!

Biomed1 I would like to respond to two of your points then I am done with this subject.

First you say none of her no reviews are for ncns, well of course not ncns reviews are removed
so you make our point that they should be there for our information.

second if I accept your theory of his story her story and the truth I guess I would have to start lying as much as the other side so you will arrive at the truth. not going to happen some of us try very hard to be truthful and some do not

If a provider has been on here for a long time, chances are you know her reputation.

If she's relatively new, how much information outside of the reviews can there be? Maybe an extra 5 - 10 minutes of light reading?

If a hobbyist has a NCNS review and there's a thread in co-ed and it actually makes the hobbyist look a little more at fault or unreasonable, aren't you doing yourself a disservice by not doing the extra research?

This thread is so stupid. There is a rule enforced by the owner of the site. Some cry like little bitches because they want it there way. Well, guess what? You do not own this site. If you believe a rule is stupid, whining about it here in Arkydom is pointless. If you want change to a rule, pm St. Chris or post a thread in the national forum for discussion. Stop whining like a school girl on the AR forum. All it does is cause pointless drama and accomplishes nothing.

He'd have better luck if he would just guest his account and come back as a better fucking person. Originally Posted by Sexy_Brittany

Best fucking comment of the entire thread.

I want to know why moderators think they need to move NCNS from the review sections. I reviewed a agreed upon appointment with a provider. The provider was inconsiderate and didn't live up to the agreement. And now the moderators want to hide that fact. Seems they are trying to protect the provider, rather than allow truthful reviews be posted. Seems fishy to me, or maybe some people are getting special favors from providers to protect their reps. Originally Posted by ncc72032

Although I can understand you're outrage, it doesn't change the *facts*, and those are that formal reviews are for time spent together. No one is stopping you from voicing that she stood you up, but it's simply not the proper place for it. Period. No one is protecting a provider by not allowing a NCNS on review counters, because you have no basis to review anything about her services. How is this so hard to understand?

In reviews, there is a question that clearly asks "Did the appointment take place at the agreed upon time?" It appears to me the original intent of writing a review was to report NCNS. The staff's recent change to obscure this from being seen anymore is troubling to me as a hobbyist. Reviews just became worthless to me without the ability to post the NCNS. I guess ECCIE wants Penthouse letters only now and not real reviews. Originally Posted by Rzrbck

No dear, that's you misinterpreting very clear written intent. Since that form is for reviewing a providers apperance, performance, and overall *session* quality/qwalms, common sense dictates that "Did the appointment take place at the agreed upon time?" is for reporting late arrivals. Again, the very definition of the word "review" explains what this form is intended for, hell, the top 3 definitions helps you in understanding this painfully evident fact:
1. To look over, study, or examine again.
2. To consider retrospectively; look back on.
3. To examine with an eye to criticism or correction.
Therefor, you can't review her, when she never showed up. As messed up as it is, it very simply, just doesn't meet the requirements for a formal review.

As I just suggested in another thread: maybe they could start a NCNS review thread that way you could search one thread to find out how frequent NCNSs are with a particular provider. Just a thought. Originally Posted by ConwayDude

+1 Since so many hobbiest find it too time consuming, confusing, and troublesome to put a providers name in the search bar, and see whats been posted about her.. Making a super special thread where you can only post and discus NCNS reviews and problems seems like a perfectly legit solution. Why hasn't anyone done this?

[QUOTE=biomed1;1053392554]Please see comments below: BOOM! You're reasoning and logic turn me on.
______________________________ ______________________________ ____________

The bottom line here, is that a *review* is for time spent with a provider. I agree, habitual disregard for clients' time should reflect negatively on a providers reputation; Do so in a constructive manner. Use your big head for a minute and figure out how you can get your red flag out to your fellow brothers in twat without violating already long standing forum policy. Start there, nothing is stopping you. The lazy are too often too quick to feel unjustified, and call a foul. Hell guys, I can find any place my handle has been mentioned on any forum here with just a few clicks.. So, if you get stood up by someone who already has a rep for doing so, you deserve it. If it's a fluke, how about being a decent human being and give the lady a chance to make things right.. If you still feel wronged, by all means report the fuck out of that ass. Honestly, doing it this way just diminishes the importance and credibility of your information by clouding it with jackassery. So that when someone does indeed try to search for this kind of info, it all looks like bull shit.

Keep Calm and Keep Fuckin'

Chickenshit for not taking a vague bet that you just hint at? I'm not stupid enough to say "I take your bet" before you even say what it is. Kind of like that guy daring you to show this miraculous body that you spend hours working out 3x a day 7 days a week on. Which anyone that actually has a clue about working out knows is stupid. Your body has to recover in order for workouts to actually work. Any workout program has recovery time built in. Apparently you were in Alabama long enough for it to rub off on you. But at least you made it through that one without any misspelled words. Good job!


You refused his dare but you expect me to just blindly accept a bet? LMAO

I'm still laughing AT you Blad.

Keep on trolling... Originally Posted by Hogfan69

So did not see you posting a picture of yourself here for all to see either. Nor anyone else. Think that is a moot point. Only an idiot would do that.

And twice a day dumbass.. You have serious reading and comprehension deficiency.. Typical for Arkansas inbred family tree that has zero branches guys.. Guess you missed the part about Deca and HGH as the recovery helper de jour.. Just showed your lack of workout and recovery knowledge.

So the bet.. I say keep it small and manageable.. Something any idiot can come up with.. 200k Rest settled in person. Unless your too chicken.

It's "you're" but I know spelling is hard on a troll...how fucking hard is that to figure out which one to use?

I'm still not taking a bet without knowing what it is. You"re (see how easy that is?) bluffing with the 200k because you know you aren't betting it. I'm done wasting my time on you Blad. 15 minutes of my life is more than enough to waste on an illiterate troll.

And when you start bragging about how I wouldn't take your (again, so easy) bet, just remember, everyone is still laughing at you.

I could say do as I do but my workout regimen would kill anyone not use to it. Plus not many people are willing to put in an hour and a half on cardio in the am and an hour and a half on the weights in the pm 7 days a week and run 4 to 6 miles a day at lunch 5 days a week either.
. Originally Posted by bladtinzu

So the 4-6 miles at lunch aren't considered a workout? Is English your first language?

And while the chemicals do help recovery, they aren't the same as rest, which your body requires to rebuild. But since I doubt you're really working out like that, it's a moot point.

According to Webster Dictionary

Definition of REVIEW

1
a : a formal military inspection
b : a military ceremony honoring a person or an event
2
: revision 1a
3
: a general survey (as of the events of a period)
4
: an act or the process of reviewing
5
: judicial reexamination (as of the proceedings of a lower tribunal by a higher)
6
a : a critical evaluation (as of a book or play)
b : a magazine devoted chiefly to reviews and essays
7
a : a retrospective view or survey (as of one's life)
b (1) : renewed study of material previously studied (2) : an exercise facilitating such study

I had a set appointment with Shayla. After repeated text conversations in the same day, I drove nearly 100 miles one way to meet her. After more texts from her, including her saying she was sending the room number and location soon, (including a phone call from her), she rudely stands me up.

My review was, according to Webster Dictionary, a retrospective view of activities I took under the exact directions of the provider to meet her (meet her at certain time, wait for her to send room number, etc); a critical evaluation of Shayla's actions and customer service skills. There were activities performed by me, and according to Webster's, that defines a review.

To quote Calista_Syn: How is this so hard to understand?

On private sites, Webster is NOT king.

You're starting to sound really butt hurt now. But congrats on getting your thread to 5 pages. If it wasn't moved that would have never happened

What part of it's the board rules and if you don't like it, don't participate is it that you aren't getting dude?

If basic research is just too much work or too complicated for you, maybe this hobby isn't suited for you.

There is no "right" or "wrong" here. It's the policy of the board owner. Don't like it? Start your own board and put up with the daily headaches and then you can make your own rules.

Okay... so there we have it...

NCNS reviews are not allowed in the review forums per board policy.
Some do not like the rule and think NCNS should be allowed in the review Forums.
This has been expressed now through numerous and various means.

I think, yes, I am hoping... that this thread will now die a natural death!

Smooch!

Lea

According to Webster Dictionary

Definition of REVIEW

1
a : a formal military inspection
b : a military ceremony honoring a person or an event
2
: revision 1a
3
: a general survey (as of the events of a period)
4
: an act or the process of reviewing
5
: judicial reexamination (as of the proceedings of a lower tribunal by a higher)
6
a : a critical evaluation (as of a book or play)
b : a magazine devoted chiefly to reviews and essays
7
a : a retrospective view or survey (as of one's life)
b (1) : renewed study of material previously studied (2) : an exercise facilitating such study

I had a set appointment with Shayla. After repeated text conversations in the same day, I drove nearly 100 miles one way to meet her. After more texts from her, including her saying she was sending the room number and location soon, (including a phone call from her), she rudely stands me up.

My review was, according to Webster Dictionary, a retrospective view of activities I took under the exact directions of the provider to meet her (meet her at certain time, wait for her to send room number, etc); a critical evaluation of Shayla's actions and customer service skills. There were activities performed by me, and according to Webster's, that defines a review.

To quote Calista_Syn: How is this so hard to understand? Originally Posted by ncc72032

Dude, you will not change policy by continually whining here. Sucks ncns happened to you but what part of board rule do you not understand. wha wha I am not getting my way, wha wha...Give it a rest. You made your point long ago. Pm the owner or post a topic in national forum for discussion if you want to try to change board policy.

Damn... and I was so hoping that the next post was going to be... "Great idea, Lea... R.I.P. NCNS Thread."

Oh well... LOL

Smooch!

Lea

According to Webster Dictionary

Definition of REVIEW

1
a : a formal military inspection
b : a military ceremony honoring a person or an event
2
: revision 1a
3
: a general survey (as of the events of a period)
4
: an act or the process of reviewing
5
: judicial reexamination (as of the proceedings of a lower tribunal by a higher)
6
a : a critical evaluation (as of a book or play)
b : a magazine devoted chiefly to reviews and essays
7
a : a retrospective view or survey (as of one's life)
b (1) : renewed study of material previously studied (2) : an exercise facilitating such study

I had a set appointment with Shayla. After repeated text conversations in the same day, I drove nearly 100 miles one way to meet her. After more texts from her, including her saying she was sending the room number and location soon, (including a phone call from her), she rudely stands me up.

My review was, according to Webster Dictionary, a retrospective view of activities I took under the exact directions of the provider to meet her (meet her at certain time, wait for her to send room number, etc); a critical evaluation of Shayla's actions and customer service skills. There were activities performed by me, and according to Webster's, that defines a review.

To quote Calista_Syn: How is this so hard to understand? Originally Posted by ncc72032

You are wrong. You're whining like a little girl, and refusing to see the clear as day facts presented to you...You can't twist facts to suite yourself, only children do that. You're as big a troll as the rest of them, without any real desire to share useful information, but simply make your pathetic little man ID not bother you oh so much for falling victim to a dumb hooker. Get over it, no activities took place, so review the lack of respect and consideration at your long drive, and move along. Stop muddying up a decent information forum with your babbling; It's embarrassing.