Repeat Reviews

He never was listed as a MOD for this area except for when he was the lone MOD for us. Originally Posted by MsElena

OK, maybe I'm remembering it wrong, but I thought he was listed with MA.

I really don't care either way, I try to stay UT(mod)R as much as possible.

LNK, some folks would think you're way is the best way. Elena is correct, I opened Nebraska and was listed at the top but relinquished it when my workload became to great to handle. Marcus became my trainee, and a very good one, and took over most of my areas. When there were problems in Nebraska, he asked me to come in and do some good. Most of that has been done. My position here has never been permanent but some love me so much that I may make it so. LMAO

There was no reason for it to be down but for you to be able to act like the poor mistreated soul and that is getting pretty old around here. I'd drop it if I were you. Originally Posted by John Bull

I know I'm not the Mod here, and I have no problem with the 90 day no repeat rule.

That being said, I'm not sure why the quote listed above was necessary. I think it's inflammatory and shows a lack of respect from JB to the poster. He clearly thought that his post was down, and I don't see him anywhere saying that he was a poor mistreated soul.

Treating people with respect is the first step in continued civility in any message board. I would hope our Mods would show impartiality and civility in all of their posts, whether they are right or not; and I'm guessing the mod is always right. I am disappointed in JB's response above, and I would expect better than his/your continued harsh tone when being "called" on the above comment.

JB, do you think it's possible that you were a little out of line on the above quote?

Prolly should have made it privately and for that I apologize to Bairstan.

Thanks JB. Appreciate it.

Thanks for the apology JB. And I accept it. All along the item that was foremost on my mind was a wonderful provider was not going to get the credit she deserved because for some reason the post had disappeared (verified by LNK). I posted early on in this thread that it was back and I was happy.

I did not like your personal attack and wanted to respond earlier but I did not because I like being here and didn't want to jeopardize getting banned or something like that. But again I accept your apology. Let's get back to fucking now.

Let the panties hit the floor.
Let the panties hit the floor.
Let the panties hit the FFFLLLLOOOORRRRRR!.

If the Provider had been assigned or to be more accurate, if the review had been assigned to the Provider, that would have been on her record. Now as to the "disappearing review", I'm just totally puzzled by that one and cannot guess whether or not that would have affected anything in the software chain. In all my years modding I've never heard of or seen such a thing. That's one for a mod conference, for sure.