Impulsive CLient, John_Tx. Dangerous!

Durango's Avatar
From another thread a couple of weeks ago:

Beagle & John TX you both are highly valued posters here. Please agree to disagree (or shake hands or whatever)......, but I ask that both of you continue to post your information & your opinions.

I repeat.....both of your contributions are very much appreciated, please continue to post.

Durango
I've changed my mind.


Beagle's contributions (& his popcorn accesories) are very much appreciated, but John TX.....not so much.

I'd put him on ignore as well, but this is too much fun. (then again I slow down to watch train wrecks. )



durango <----still kind of likes the look of the spinner who started this thread .
ezman's Avatar
  • ezman
  • 08-25-2010, 03:57 PM
Now I know why John_tx is so hung up on tineye hits on BP pics, or on newbie girls. His self alerts here would pretty much keep any self-respecting eccie reading provider from seeing him.

Can't seem to catch on. Always has to have the last word. Always right, nobody else has a clue. Sense of entitlement.

He should be glad that this isn't the old aspd. He would have been banned long ago.
Trip's Avatar
  • Trip
  • 08-25-2010, 04:00 PM
Amrita Lover's Avatar
Whew, just finished reading to the very end of this thread.... and I hope this is the end too!
nuglet's Avatar
A.L. I think it's like one of the creepy slasher movies.... it's quiet......for now.

Look! Look! a SHARK fin!!!!!..........
per "advice" of a mod i am going to stop posting on here. Originally Posted by John_TX

If only it was true.
Guest031411-2's Avatar
Dear mods,

This thread has run its course, is there any chance that you could lock it? There is no hope in sight for a positive outcome from any further discourse here.

annoyed in Austin
im glad there are absolutely no sanctions for others who make false allegations against me. there are only sanctions against me for defending myself.......gotta love this board!

and i believe cody may be a multiple handle post for NaughtyGurlz......since he took instant offense to me saying that the girl he reviewed is also working for other another agency. who besides an agency owner would care about that? Originally Posted by John_TX

You have no idea if anyone else has been sanctioned or not. We (staff) do not discuss sanctions with anyone except the involved parties.

I am going to ask nicely, one last time. Step back and take a deep breath. I can assure you that the staff is showing no favoritism to anyone who breaks our rules and guidelines. If you continue to take shots at the staff here I will be forced to take action.

Spacemtn
AustinModStaff
Dear mods,

This thread has run its course, is there any chance that you could lock it? There is no hope in sight for a positive outcome from any further discourse here.

annoyed in Austin Originally Posted by kittyloveratx

Short answer is NO. The original poster may make this request. Outside of that some people don't know when to stop.
rrrabbit's Avatar
Needless to say, there is a LOT of "he said, she said" going on here.

While I have no proof, nor any impulsive opinions on the subject, there is this one observation of mine, perhaps worthy of a post:

--------------
If the provider's intent was to put out a warning for the safety of others, why was this warning not posted in the ladie's locker room, but was posted for all eyes to see ?

Simple deduction implies:
1) Ladies Locker Room = thanks for the heads up
2) CO-ED = popcorn material, bad for a new provider's overall business; or was it placed there for fear of retribution from a bad review, maybe ?

It was placed for all eyes to see because:
a) it was a judgement mistake
b) there was ulterior motive behind that decision
--------------

Which of those two possibilities is the fact, I can not say.

However, I can comfortably deduce that one or the other is a mathematical FACT.
My guess is it was posted here because she has no access yet to the ladies area since she is not yet verified.
rrrabbit's Avatar
My guess is it was posted here because she has no access yet to the ladies area since she is not yet verified. Originally Posted by Sexy Roxanne
Leave it to a future lawyer, to introduce symantics, and blow my mathematical FACT.

Waaahhhhh !!! I want may mama.... WAAAHHHAAAHHHAAAHHHAAA !!!

LMAO...
Beagle's Avatar
Aww....is rrrabbit hungry? Marley Monroe has what you need....shhhh......shhhh....sh hh....don't cry now.

If only John_TX will reply about the time the appointment was at. It would corroborate or invalidate some of the accusations that are thrown in here.
Rand Al'Thor's Avatar
Aww....is rrrabbit hungry? Marley Monroe has what you need....shhhh......shhhh....sh hh....don't cry now.

If only John_TX will reply about the time the appointment was at. It would corroborate or invalidate some of the accusations that are thrown in here. Originally Posted by beaglebeagle
I think those details are unlikely to come to light, there's not much the two parties agree on.