Providers who have been run off the board by trolls...

She can't post any private communications between the two of you, you're permission is irrelevant... Originally Posted by Wakeup

The fuck she can't. People post shit they are not supposed to post all the time around here.But the fact of the matter is she has nothing to post from me as i have had no contact with her.

AND...
She can damn sure confirm or deny if i have ever contacted her privately.



.

I haven't ever tried to schedule with bsc I don't want to catch that shit. Look what it's done to you!

Plus your lil girlfriend has my permission to post any contact that she might have lied to you about me contacting her. Post away Natalina... Originally Posted by WTF

The fuck she can't. People post shit they are not supposed to post all the time around here.But the fact of the matter is she has nothing to post from me as i have had no contact with her.

AND...
She can damn sure confirm or deny if i have ever contacted her privately. Originally Posted by WTF

No, she can't as much as I'm sure she'd love to post your PM's requesting an appointment and verbally abusing her.

Here's the Forum Guideline and a Mod just confirmed it.

#9 - No form of private communications between members are to be posted in our forums. This includes the contents of emails, PMs, IMs, private chat logs, privately shared images, etc. This is an invasion of another's privacy and will not be allowed.

You claiming that you never tried to make an appointment with her his not proof .... Johnny's waiting for your proof. You said you could prove that you never tried to make an appointment with NM ... by all means ... the floor's yours.

And, you can post the link to that website that you claim she blasted out RL info. That's not a rules violation.

Point of order:

She can't quote or screenshot the private communications but she is welcome to paraphrase in her own words in order to tell her side of the story.

Also, if that link you're referring to leads to accessible RW information about a member it most definitely is a violation.

Play through...

^^^

You just did the old lady thing at the golf course......

Point of order:

She can't quote or screenshot the private communications but she is welcome to paraphrase in her own words in order to tell her side of the story.

... Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

See there StinkyFingers your girl can .... but she won't because it never happened.

You can spin that lie all you want and I'll just continue to beat it over the head with tje truth.


..

Point of order:

She can't quote or screenshot the private communications but she is welcome to paraphrase in her own words in order to tell her side of the story.

Also, if that link you're referring to leads to accessible RW information about a member it most definitely is a violation.

Play through... Originally Posted by SpiceItUp

Spice ... on a related note:

#23 - .... We also ask that you refrain from including links to or mention of competing websites.

Define "competing websites" ... I have a link from a website that I'd like to post that will prove my point, but "competing websites" is not a conclusively defined term.

See there StinkyFingers your girl can .... but she won't because it never happened.

You can spin that lie all you want and I'll just continue to beat it over the head with tje truth. Originally Posted by WTF

You really, really think she's going to help you bail on this? ... I suspect she will not paraphrase your PM's ... no point in her taking any risks.

You said you could prove that you never tried to make an appointment with NM ... Johnny's still waiting ... as is everyone else.

You're a proven liar ... why should anyone believe you now?

See there StinkyFingers your girl can .... but she won't because it never happened.

You can spin that lie all you want and I'll just continue to beat it over the head with tje truth. Originally Posted by WTF

Here you go ... I'll post the truth for you. Save you some time while you trying to figure out how to prove you never tried to make an appointment with NM.

So, now it comes around full circle. WTF contact NM for an appointment, but he does not comply with her screening requirements as he's trying to get appointments without "this three references bullshit."

NM refuses and WTF gets beligerent and abusive, cursing at her, calling her names trying to goad her into an appointment without references.

She puts an alert on Infoshare about his boorish, abuse behavior and since WTF has been peeking into the ladies room, he sees the alert. WTF goes on a rampage on the open Board seeking to damage her reputation by claiming that she's posting RL information and also claiming that her screening criteria include divulging RL info, both of which are patently false. He further tries to cover this by claiming that it wasn't his RL info in the alert, but some other hobbyists'. He then claims that she "blasted" the alert on multiple websites, but he refuses to identify the website(s) ... this is also patently false.

The end result is that WTF has to promise the Mods that he won't any longer "speculate" as to what is posted in Infoshare, he admitted that he lied and he can't support any of his "speculations"

Good luck with all those no-mind fucked three reference bullshit appointment offers that I'm sure are filling your inbox.

See there StinkyFingers your girl can .... but she won't because it never happened.

You can spin that lie all you want and I'll just continue to beat it over the head with tje truth.


.. Originally Posted by WTF

And, you won't post a link to that website ... because it doesn't exist. You know it and I know it.

You really, really think she's going to help you bail on this? ... I suspect she will not paraphrase your PM's ... no point in her taking any risks.

You said you could prove that you never tried to make an appointment with NM ... Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

What risk...she can just say that "WTF tried to see me and would not comply with my screening requirements and then was verbally abusive."

The Mods then might want to see that communication as it seems like a serious allegation. That is when she would be up chit creek without a paddle.

I'm proving it by Natalia's silence. I've never tried to see her. Never will.She could offer to pay me and I'd decline. I do not care for her attitude.

She puts an alert on Infoshare about his boorish, abuse behavior and since WTF has been peeking into the ladies room, he sees the alert. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

It wasn't me she put an alert on! You are showing your ignorance extra special tonight.

What risk...she can just say that "WTF tried to see me and would not comply with my screening requirements and then was verbally abusive."

The Mods then might want to see that as that seems like a pretty serious allegation.

I'm proving it by Natalia's silence. Originally Posted by WTF

You aren't proving jack shit. And, your allegations against her? Requiring RL info for screening ... Posting RL info in an alert ... blasting RL info on other websites ... You haven't proved any of that. And, those are pretty serious allegations.

Your proving that they're lies by YOUR silence and failure to provide proof ... Carry on.

It wasn't me she put an alert on! You are showing your ignorance extra special tonight. Originally Posted by WTF

Fine, then prove that it wasn't you who was the subject of the alert.

Here's a reminder of the Guidelines before you get yourself banned:

#20 - The men and women of our board each have their respective private areas in which secure content is posted and a greater freedom of expression allowed. Each member is responsible for keeping the information in any of the private secure areas (Men's Lounge, Provider Powder Room, The Rest of the Story, posts which have been tagged as private) [B]100% restricted to the members who are intended to have access to that material.[/B] Revealing ANY content which was posted in one of the men's or women's private sections of the board will result in penalty, up to and including loss of your access to these areas. Full cooperation may result in a less severe penalty, and each violation will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Repeated infractions will impact the severity of punishment.

Revealing ANY content which was posted in one of the men's or women's private sections of the board will result in penalty, up to and including loss of your access to these areas. Full cooperation may result in a less severe penalty, and each violation will be handled on a case-by-case basis. Repeated infractions will impact the severity of punishment. Originally Posted by StinkyFingers

You are the one saying Natalia posted an alert on me in infoshare.

Are you saying tje Mods should punish you?

What risk...she can just say that "WTF tried to see me and would not comply with my screening requirements and then was verbally abusive."

The Mods then might want to see that communication as it seems like a serious allegation. That is when she would be up chit creek without a paddle.

I'm proving it by Natalia's silence. I've never tried to see her. Never will.She could offer to pay me and I'd decline. I do not care for her attitude. Originally Posted by WTF

MODS don't have access to the contents of PM's between people on the Board. The MODS can't help you on this one either ... You're all on your own. Now, prove it.