How are we going to pay for all this shit?

Of course you are, Two-Face! That's why you're so obsessed with Ronnie Reagan's economic "prowess" as you like to call it. In case you didn't notice, the Gipper's been out of office for almost 33 years.

For those of you who aren't familiar with wtf's sad and sorry posting history on economic matters, this may help: Originally Posted by lustylad

Your ignorance of what I actually said and what you think I said are two different things...

My point has been and still is...Reagan started this deficit spending like it does not matter. And he also started a whole group that have it stuck in their hard heads that tax cuts are always effective and or efficient.

If you knew this country's history. you'd know that we have run up high debt but we always followed it up by paying it down.

That went out the window with Reagan...Bush tried (with a push from Ross Perot) and y'all kicked him out of office.

So when you'd quit lying about what I said. I'd quit calling you a liar.

My point has been and still is...Reagan started this deficit spending blah blah blah... Originally Posted by WTF

Stop right there... you can't help yourself, can you?

Didn't you just tell us you're "more interested in the present and short term future" than in the past? Yet all it takes is a slight nudge for you to fly off on a fucking tangent proving you're still obsessed with a President who left office over 3 decades ago!

SMH... you can't even remember what you just posted long enough to avoid contradicting yourself!

Sad. Feeble. Pathetic.

Stop right there... you can't help yourself, can you?

Didn't you just tell us you're "more interested in the present and short term future" than in the past? Yet all it takes is a slight nudge for you to fly off on a fucking tangent proving you're still obsessed with a President who left office over 3 decades ago!

SMH... you can't even remember what you just posted long enough to avoid contradicting yourself!

Sad. Feeble. Pathetic. Originally Posted by lustylad

You lie about what I have said about Reagan....I correct it and you then convolut that is some proof that I care more about economics from the past than current or future economic policy in terms of investment purposes?

Do you understand why other than humor...I have little interest in your view of economic views. Once again....CaptainMidnight offers useful insight in regards to policy and how they may effect markets.

You on the other hand do mental gymnastics to justify shaky partisan political positions.

One is amusing and the other is useful.

I suppose you will just again lie about what I just said. I will then correct you and you will say that is proof you're economics is more interesting than CM.

Ivy Leaguer, I noticed that 1b1 is banned. He can still come to eccie.net and read the posts. That is what Waco Kid did when he was banned. There are democrats who are concerned about the costs of the legislation but feel there are good investments that are needed to not go forward. Rep Stephanie Murphy is an example. The democrats feel the below items are needed.

The CBO scored the bill. They concluded that 363 billion will be added to the deficit over ten years. That is not much. There are other items that costs the government a lot more.

The new bill provides free preschool for all 3- and 4-year-olds, boosts coverage of home-care costs for the elderly and disabled, significantly cuts the cost of some prescription drugs such insulin, expands affordable housing programs, increases grants for college students, and puts $550 billion toward tackling climate change.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/u-house-p...173637552.html Originally Posted by adav8s28

'a' Disagree on teh statement about banning - - My experience was to be totally shut out of teh web site. no access to anything. No notification from the mod to my e-mail - no explanation, no notification of teh duration of banning. FYI - I hope you do not share that experience.



Quote - The CBO scored the bill. They concluded that 363 billion will be added to the deficit over ten years. That is not much.

I think this statement ($363 billion - is not much) epitomizes teh 'Liberal' economics theories - that America can 'Government spend itself into prosperity. By taxing teh rich and middle class out of existence, while teh nomenklatura is exempted from their own laws and grows wealthy (ier) at the hands of their own corrupt selves and their passed bills.

Greece is an example - if we continue the DPST tax and spend party - we will end up in economic collapse
Perhaps that is the 'Burn it all down first' part of teh BBB bill.
but - no democraticommunist will even consider or countenance such a heretical thought towards their 'marxist paradise'.



Buck fiden
From my cold dead hands!.

I'm not the one with my panties in a wad...

You're a right wing snake oil salesman...

if I appear dismissive towards you, it is because I am... Originally Posted by WTF

You lie about what I have said...

I have little interest in your view...

I suppose you will just again lie about what I just said... Originally Posted by WTF

You need to learn when to stfu. You say you have "little interest" in my views - yet you respond lamely to all my posts?

Like oeb11, your problem is you can't control your compulsion to respond to everyone on everything without having a new or coherent thought.

The mods should quarantine both of you in your own little forum and let the two of you have at it.

You need to learn when to stfu.

. Originally Posted by lustylad

You're just butt hurt because I've shown Ouija board could make better economic points than you.

Did you ask your ouija board how many trannies Santa Claus will bring you this year?

Or do you mostly just talk about Reaganomics?

You need to learn when to stfu. You say you have "little interest" in my views - yet you respond lamely to all my posts?

Like oeb11, your problem is you can't control your compulsion to respond to everyone on everything without having a new or coherent thought.

The mods should quarantine both of you in your own little forum and let the two of you have at it. Originally Posted by lustylad

LL - I generally agree with Your POV, and respect your opinion
However - if One wants to be insulting adn nasty - Be my guest
SAD for You - sir!
Considering your little war with wtf above - perhaps You should be looking in teh mirror about a 'cage match', good sir!

Did you ask your ouija board how many trannies Santa Claus will bring you this year?

Or do you mostly just talk about Reaganomics? Originally Posted by lustylad

He bringing me two....one to shove up your bum and the other to stifle your noisy ecstasy.

Please don't make jokes about stuffing trannies in people's bums and mouths. ts Winn Dixie is a sensitive soul and you're going to upset him.

... Too Right, Tiny...

Hey Mates, just post your OPINIONS and leave the rest
of your bullshit on the dock.

### Salty

Considering your little war with wtf above - perhaps You should be looking in teh (sic) mirror about a 'cage match', good sir! Originally Posted by oeb11

A cage match sounds like a splendid idea! Betcha half of eccie would pay to watch! Should be an easy win for you, though. Wtf is all softened up... I've been pounding him to a bloody pulp for years!

Please don't make jokes about stuffing trannies in people's bums and mouths. Originally Posted by Tiny

He wasn't joking. Wtf is a legend in the Houston tranny community.

He wasn't joking. Wtf is a legend in the Houston tranny community.

] Originally Posted by lustylad

You want a tranny in your mouth and bum more than bambino wants a fist up his ass.

Please don't do the review like bambam