let's get this straight. Carlson is an opinion based show exactly like Maddow and Joe Scarborough and Don Lemon and if anyone sued them for their content they'd say the same thing. Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
tucker's opinions are not without facts to back them up. the left just doesn't like inconvenient truth and must therefore label it as "false" Originally Posted by The_Waco_Kid
The point is that Carlson has less than 1 percent of the population watching and that he isn't considered to be truthful.He already stated that he's just a talking head.
How important can the news be if they have a person that Fox news and our legal system considers untrustworthy? Since it's not trustworthy, it has to be explained. It needs Carlson's perspective to be Carlson's version.
It's not important if it can only "be explained" by the person making it up. Originally Posted by Tigbitties38
Of course he doesn't give how straight arrow he is with the facts.
And since not a hard news journalist, I don't care about his miss/hit ratio is with facts.