Recorded Sessions?

N.M.'s Avatar
  • N.M.
  • 11-12-2015, 07:08 PM
Butt, butt, butt "ECCIE2NDAVE" join date Oct.25, 2015, with 2 bs reviews, you're wayyy off topic... Learn to follow directions:


The subject matter of this thread is supposed to be what is stated in the OP's first post. Please make sure that is what your posts are about. This freaking thread is totally derailed.

Subject Matter or Close! It's in your hands. Originally Posted by DarthMaul
But please proceed and tell me what else "you have been told" about NATALIA MORI, and please name these "close friends" of mine, because last time I checked I have NO one in the business I call friends...

On topic: telling someone to use audio recordings as a method of safety instead of screening is the second most stupid thing I've heard all week after the dumbass post "ECCIENDAVE" just made..

Carry on...
ECCIE2NDAVE's Avatar
Butt, butt, butt "ECCIE2NDAVE" join date Oct.25, 2015, with 2 bs reviews, you're wayyy off topic... Learn to follow directions:




But please proceed and tell me what else "you have been told" about NATALIA MORI, and please name these "close friends" of mine, because last time I checked I have NO one in the business I call friends...

On topic: telling someone to use audio recordings as a method of safety instead of screening is the second most stupid thing I've heard all week after the dumbass post "ECCIENDAVE" just made..

Carry on... Originally Posted by Natalia Mori


[QUOTE=Natalia Mori;

On topic: telling someone to use audio recordings as a method of safety instead of screening is the second most stupid thing I've heard all week after the dumbass post "ECCIENDAVE" just made..

Carry on...[/QUOTE]

,,,a lady ignores Drama unless she enjoys stirring the
pot. We have officially recorded you in this Thread,,,,
jhobbyist's Avatar
Smh...seems like a sociopath to me.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 11-12-2015, 10:09 PM

On topic: telling someone to use audio recordings as a method of safety instead of screening is the second most stupid thing I've heard all week after the dumbass post "ECCIENDAVE" just made..

Carry on... Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
Natalia Moron,

I recommend ladies not agreeing to a fee for service and recording that fact. I first laid to rest that it was illegal to do. It is not, so folks were spreading misinformation, namely LL & DM. I would in fact recommend you change all the activity you admit to on your showcase...a DA would have a field day with it.

Guys were talking about the danger of audio recordings and i then pointed out the fact that a woman such as yourself that shares RW information in infoshare among other places is a bigger danger to a client safety/discretion than you having just a audio recording of a client and no RW information.

I then pointed out why a guy who engages in the activity papi likes...might be a good idea for him to audio record a lady consenting to those activities.

All of which is good sound advice or just plain facts.

You seem to think your method of screening is immune from Vice. It is not. In fact a high profile lady who thinks she knows it all on eccie would be a feather in their cap. Trust me...if i can slip past your vaunted screening without detection. .. Vice can too. My audio recording advice is meant for ladies not as arrogant as you. Ladies who realize wtf a backup plan actually is.

You don't think a client you have seen before could not be busted for something and then tell Vice he could record you...Vice busts you and so much for your screening. Is that any crazier than ladies recording guys and guys having to worry about blackmailed? Hyperbole? No more so than those worried about audio recordings...
No OJ ...I need no more evidence. You led Dorthy Moron to believe that audio recordings were illegal. I gave you the opportunity both then and now to tell Dorthy that she was incorrect.You did not have the integrity to tell Dorthy then or now that she was wrong.

Are you now saying that audio recordings are legal? Tell Dorthy, not me. I knew this long ago. Originally Posted by WTF
He didn't leave me to believe anything I read it on the link I posted come up with a original name than that when speaking to me.. Your wrong and you can't come to grips..


When in a private setting & sexual encounters occur it is illegal to audio record period it states it in that fucking link I posted 20 pages ago not my fault you can't get it through your head...
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 11-12-2015, 10:32 PM
but but but i have been told that you save RW info from P411 handle & share it with your close friends...is that true ??? Originally Posted by ECCIE2NDAVE
She shares it with other ladies...like she said, she has no close friends... you'd have to be deaf to be friends with her! Girl can talk more and say less than any woman i know ....besides LexusLover!

When in a private setting & sexual encounters occur it is illegal to audio record period it states it in that fucking link I posted 20 pages ago not my fault you can't get it through your head... Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe
WRONG,,,, if you have a security camera in every room of your house/apartment/residence,you can record it.
  • cr76
  • 11-12-2015, 10:33 PM
and how well do you think it's going to go over with the hobbyist if they think each encounter is being recorded??
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 11-12-2015, 10:38 PM
He didn't leave me to believe anything I read it on the link I posted come up with a original name than that when speaking to me.. Your wrong and you can't come to grips..


When in a private setting & sexual encounters occur it is illegal to audio record period it states it in that fucking link I posted 20 pages ago not my fault you can't get it through your head... Originally Posted by Dorthy_Monroe
My apologies DM, LL's distortion solidified your mistaken belief that the above nonsense you posted is true. I do believe that was LL's intent.

Were you to contact an lawyer...I'd be glad to pay for his services if what you think is true...if i am correct, LL gets to fuck you for free and write a review. I'd almost pay the lawyer to lie just to read that review!
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 11-12-2015, 10:41 PM
and how well do you think it's going to go over with the hobbyist if they think each encounter is being recorded?? Originally Posted by cr76
If it is secretly recorded like it should if you in fact record...it will not change a thing. Providers do not advertise this fact. Just like they do not advertise the fact that many are encouraged to put your info on blast in infoshare. You seem not to worry about that.


.
N.M.'s Avatar
  • N.M.
  • 11-12-2015, 10:43 PM
WTF- I really wish I could tell you you're right about this, so you would let it go already but I can't tell you that because you're NOT.

Just like you're wrong about your assumptions/accusations about me sharing information, I have never had the need to make an alert, since I started in April, want to know why? Because I screen throughly, I'm very cautious on who I see, I'm never desperate to see anybody, I'm not implying that I'm immune to LE or a bad situation, nothing is 100% safe in this hobby, I'm not a crazy unreasonable person to think that.

What you don't understand about your brilliant idea to audio record is that, even according to you, doing that will cover base and save you from an encounter with LE, correct? But that's not the only concern or risk us providers take when meeting someone. If I was to go with your advice and see a guy like the lady from your infamous case, after one phone call, let's say the guy is not LE, and he's just a lowlife asshole who decides not to leave his donation, how would an audio recording going to help me in this case ??
upskirt pictures are legal,,,heh
I can't believe it is ok to secretly take pictures of a ladies camel toe,,,
http://www.cnn.com/2014/03/05/us/mas...t-photography/

  • cr76
  • 11-12-2015, 10:59 PM
something like that is bound to leak soon or later.
WTF's Avatar
  • WTF
  • 11-12-2015, 11:02 PM
WTF- .

What you don't understand about your brilliant idea to audio record is that, even according to you, doing that will cover base and save you from an encounter with LE, correct? ? Originally Posted by Natalia Mori
No...that is not what I said. I said to never agree to a fee for service. If you take nothing else away from this conversation, try and learn that.

Next i said it is legal to record that conversation of you not agreeing to a fee for service and should a Vice officer say you did agree to a fee for service... a recording of that conversation would come in handy were you to have listened to my first paragraph correctly.

Were i a provider and were i to record that initial conversation. .. i would immediately delete it after the gent left.