Inquiries and Impeachment of Trump

Unique_Carpenter's Avatar
We need to go back to the way things were, when a simple duel settled things.
Vice president Burr killed Hamilton
Future president Jackson killed Dickenson
Representative Graves killed Representative Cilley.
There's more.
SpeedRacerXXX's Avatar
Now you are speaking truly from just supposition and I have to assume you mean from the Position of POTUS and not just in general of vindictive people in the US.

But, I counter based on their(his) "death trail"(also supposition), the Clintons(Bill if speaking only from the POTUS standpoint) are well ahead of Trump as the most vindictive people ever in the history of the US. Take their trashing of the White House alone after Gore lost to GW and you see them as they are. And if you scour history of the US, I'm sure you find even worse.

Absolutes are laughable and who has Trump actually "hurt" other than career wise potentially? Do you honestly believe he puts a "hit" out on someone? That's Clintonista, not Trump.

Please define living hell if it's not what this guy is already going to go through as being outted. Trump will do nothing further other than rhetoric.

It's a sham to believe this guy needs shielded. Originally Posted by eccielover
I did say the "political arena" and probably should have narrowed it down to the office of the POTUS.

Trump over his 34 months in office has demeaned almost all those who have left his administration because of disagreements. Those that he praised one day are thrown under the bus the next day. No I do not think Trump would physically harm anyone. But hurting someone career wise is most certainly not a positive.


As far as "Clitonista". The legend continues. No proof

A "living hell"? Remember back in your school days how there was always a bully or bullies who made your life difficult. For little reason. I remember such individuals and avoided them like the plague. When someone attempts to disgrace you on a national level, I would call that a "living hell".

I voted against Bill Clinton twice. Clinton may have trashed the W.H. to some extent but he did not throw people under the bus who had served him loyally and then left the administration for whatever reason. Same goes for GW Bush and Obama.

Trump supporters defend such actions by him by saying he is "different". That he is. Accept the bad with the good.

As for shielding the whistle-blower.

"The Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 was enacted to protect federal employees who disclose "Government illegality, waste, and corruption" from adverse consequences related to their employment. This act provides protection to whistleblowers that may receive demotions, pay cuts, or a replacement employee."


Exactly my point.
Jaxson66's Avatar
. The latest news on the impeachment inquiry

President Trump told reporters he "hardly know[s]" Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union who donated to Trump's inaugural fund and revised his testimony this week to say there was "likely" a quid pro quo between Mr. Trump and the Ukrainian president

House Democrats released transcripts of the testimony of NSC official Alexander Vindman and Fiona Hill, the president's former national security adviser on Russia and European affairs

Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff who appeared last month to admit that the administration may have sought a quid pro quo, became the 14th Trump official on Friday who has refused to testify in the hearings

The House Intelligence Committee will hold the first open hearings of the impeachment inquiry next week, featuring public testimony from three key witnesses.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
. The latest news on the impeachment inquiry

President Trump told reporters he "hardly know[s]" Gordon Sondland, the U.S. ambassador to the European Union who donated to Trump's inaugural fund and revised his testimony this week to say there was "likely" a quid pro quo between Mr. Trump and the Ukrainian president

House Democrats released transcripts of the testimony of NSC official Alexander Vindman and Fiona Hill, the president's former national security adviser on Russia and European affairs

Mick Mulvaney, the acting White House chief of staff who appeared last month to admit that the administration may have sought a quid pro quo, became the 14th Trump official on Friday who has refused to testify in the hearings

The House Intelligence Committee will hold the first open hearings of the impeachment inquiry next week, featuring public testimony from three key witnesses.
Originally Posted by Jaxson66





But but but Marie Yovanovitch!


But but but Bill Taylor!


But but but who's next???


BAHHAHHHAAAAA
Jaxson66's Avatar
Bolton knows about 'many relevant meetings and conversations' on Ukraine that lawmakers might be unaware of, his lawyer says

Former national security adviser John Bolton was "personally involved in many of the events, meetings and conversations" at the heart of the House impeachment inquiry "as well as many relevant meetings and conversations that have not yet been discussed" publicly, his lawyer revealed Friday.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/tru...ation-n1079036

Hell ya, let’s hear what he has to say, he seems to be pleading to testify.
rexdutchman's Avatar
But wait this is all over not giving free money to Ukraine to give back to politico s in our guberment ?

Jaxson66's Avatar
The GOP Just Released Its Own Witness List for Impeachment Inquiries—and It’s All About Biden and Clinton

House Republicans released a wish list Saturday morning of witnesses they’d like to see testify when Congress holds its first public hearings on President Donald Trump’s “perfect” call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelinsky next week. Not surprisingly, most of them have nothing to do with the impropriety of the call itself.

But, but, but Clinton

But, but, but Biden

But, but, but the perfect transcript of the perfect call released by the perfect leader.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
The GOP Just Released Its Own Witness List for Impeachment Inquiries—and It’s All About Biden and Clinton

House Republicans released a wish list Saturday morning of witnesses they’d like to see testify when Congress holds its first public hearings on President Donald Trump’s “perfect” call with Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelinsky next week. Not surprisingly, most of them have nothing to do with the impropriety of the call itself.

But, but, but Clinton

But, but, but Biden

But, but, but the perfect transcript of the perfect call released by the perfect leader. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

But but but Marie Yovanovitch!


But but but Bill Taylor!


But but but who's next???


BAHHAHHHAAAAA
Jaxson66's Avatar
But wait this is all over not giving free money to Ukraine to give back to politico s in our guberment ?

Originally Posted by rexdutchman
Your truly pathetic, I can’t even understand your insults, so it’s off to leprosy island with you. Whako and Delbert can keep you company.
The_Waco_Kid's Avatar
Your truly pathetic, I can’t even understand your insults, so it’s off to leprosy island with you. Whako and Delbert can keep you company. Originally Posted by Jaxson66

But but but Marie Yovanovitch!


But but but Bill Taylor!


But but but who's next???


BAHHAHHHAAAAA
bambino's Avatar
Your truly pathetic, I can’t even understand your insults, so it’s off to leprosy island with you. Whako and Delbert can keep you company. Originally Posted by Jaxson66
It’s....You’re truly pathetic. But thanks for being pathetic.
lustylad's Avatar
I can’t even understand your insults... Originally Posted by Jaxson66
What's so hard for you to understand?

He said isn't this about taxpayer dollars flowing to Ukraine so they can turn around and give kickbacks to corrupt Americans like Joe and Hunter Biden?

Why would anyone object if the POTUS wanted to stop wasting our tax money this way?

The Bidens are stone-cold corrupt. And so are you if you defend them.
  • oeb11
  • 11-09-2019, 02:46 PM
The Bidens are entitled to a defense attorney in our system - and the presumption of innocence until proven guilty in a court of law.

I hope they get their defender , and opportunity, in the near future.
It’s....You’re truly pathetic. But thanks for being pathetic. Originally Posted by bambino
It thought he was trying to say.

Yours Truly, pathetic(jax poster)
Jaxson66's Avatar
What's so hard for you to understand?

He said isn't this about taxpayer dollars flowing to Ukraine so they can turn around and give kickbacks to corrupt Americans like Joe and Hunter Biden?

Why would anyone object if the POTUS wanted to stop wasting our tax money this way?

The Bidens are stone-cold corrupt. And so are you if you defend them. Originally Posted by lustylad
Everybody knows Hunter Biden was a double secret agent who infiltrated the Burmisa Corp. to spy on the trump campaign. It was Hunter who wrote the Black Ledger and added Manafort’s name. It was Hunter, his daddy and Obama who secretly hid the Clinton secret server in the basement of a Pizza restaurant in Kiev. Hunter was the killer of Seth Rich because he was going to be a whistle blower for Nunes.

but it’s none of that bullshit, it’s simple, the fat lying bastard extorted Ukraine with much needed arms to create lies against his political opponents. He’s asked people in his administration to falsify documents on two separate incidents.
It’s the way the fat lying bastard rolls.