This seems to have been beat to death, but let me add a bit of a twist, if i may.71% which is both provider and hobbyist combined say no. Just numbers .
My own feeling is that the definition of what makes a GFE should be subjective rather than objective. If a girl lacks in one area, but makes up for it in another, she can still tip the scales to a GFE level. Much like a girl can still be considered hot without nice legs if she has a face and body that makes up for it.
But let's for a moment assume your premise is correct; that a girl shouldn't advertise as a GFE if she doesn't offer the list of services necessary as determined by the "majority" of all hobbyists.
Now let's take it a step further. Let's assume that, say, China Doll (and i trust she won't mind my using her as an example) is capable of delivering the sort of overall service that compels a majority of her clients to consider her a GFE, in spite of the lack of BBBJ's. To pick a number, let's just say, oh, 7 out of every 10 clients she has is so wowed by her cumulative charms that they review her and state they consider her a GFE. At that point, since the majority of her clients view her, for whatever reasons, as a GFE, can China then advertise as a GFE? Originally Posted by Doove
71% which is both provider and hobbyist combined say no. Just numbers .Let me rephrase. Let's suppose we have 2 providers - China Doll and "Sugar Baby". Let's suppose China Doll doesn't offer BBBJ but the majority of her clients say she's a GFE. Sugar Baby does offer BBBJ, but the majority of her clients say she's in no way a GFE. They both advertise as GFE.
China seems to be a quality provider. If her clients say she is GFE then I believe that they think she is. If you go by the average hobbyist then you have to say no according to the poll. I don't think it's trying to change anybodies mind. It's just stating the numbers. Hey they can be complete GFE according to the poll and still not get you hot. Originally Posted by burkalini
Let me rephrase. Let's suppose we have 2 providers - China Doll and "Sugar Baby". Let's suppose China Doll doesn't offer BBBJ but the majority of her clients say she's a GFE. Sugar Baby does offer BBBJ, but the majority of her clients say she's in no way a GFE. They both advertise as GFE.which one says 'not tonight...i have a headache?'
Who, according to you, is misrepresenting themselves more so than the other? Originally Posted by Doove
if a burger joint says it has the best burgers in town...and most ppl agree it has the best burgers...but you dont really care for them...they still earned the right to say 'voted best burger in town' Originally Posted by bubbaJayUnless you were trying to back up what i said, i'm not sure how this analogy is relevant.
Unless you were trying to back up what i said, i'm not sure how this analogy is relevant.im saying such a provider has the right to advertise GFE. Does that mean she IS GFE? IS the 'voted best burger' THE best burger to YOU? "non clients" that never had the burger cant really judge the burger now can they?
Are you agreeing that if the majority of a provider's clients say she's a GFE, then she's a GFE no matter what her non-clients might say based on a set of rules? Originally Posted by Doove
Let me rephrase. Let's suppose we have 2 providers - China Doll and "Sugar Baby". Let's suppose China Doll doesn't offer BBBJ but the majority of her clients say she's a GFE. Sugar Baby does offer BBBJ, but the majority of her clients say she's in no way a GFE. They both advertise as GFE.Nothing is according to me. It's according to the poll. Don't attach this to my personal wants. Everything I have said is just the numbers thats all. You could change the experiment and make it anyway you want it to come out. I just quoted the numbers and said that true GFE is between people that have feelings for each other. Everything we experience in the hobby is fantasy as it should be. That's all
Who, according to you, is misrepresenting themselves more so than the other? Originally Posted by Doove