Another Great BLACK MAN Dies

Trump replacing slackers, liars and takers is helping.



Originally Posted by MT Pockets

FTFY

HAHAHAHAHAHAH! Poor IBH, the truth is killing you, isn’t it?

Trump got “Pecker slapped” today.

Between him and Cohen, there may be enough to chase the e tire White House out of the West Wing and onto your poster!

Trump got “Pecker slapped” today.
Originally Posted by Yssup Rider

and i bet he tongue lashed Melania for it!

ahhahahaaa

The dims ain't got nothing, but they keep sucking for the white gravy from an empty meat straw.

Cohen's plea deal is prosecutor's attempt to set up Trump

[I]f the purpose of this money paid, just before the election, would be to hurt Trump and help hildebeest win, this payment would be a corporate political contribution. If using it not to get Trump would be a corporate contribution, then using it to get Trump also has to be a corporate contribution. That is why neither are corporate contributions and this is a bogus approach to federal election law. Note that none of the donors in the 2012 John Edwards case faced any legal issues and the Federal Election Commission ruled their payments were not campaign contributions that had to be reported, both facts that prosecutors tried to suppress at trial....

Contrast what is going on here with the treatment of the millions of dollars paid to a Democratic law firm which, in turn, paid out money to political research firm Fusion GPS and British spy Christopher Steele without listing them on any campaign expenditure form, despite crystal clear laws and regulations that the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds must be listed. This rule was even tightened recently. There is no question that hiring spies to do opposition research in Russia is a campaign expenditure, yet no prosecutorial raids have been sprung on the law firm, Fusion GPS or Steele. The reason? It does not ‘get’ Trump.

(The Hill)

Mark Penn is a former pollster for both Slick Willie and hildebeest, and he penned this op-ed for The Hill on Wednesday.

The dims ain't got nothing, but they keep sucking for the white gravy from an empty meat straw.



Mark Penn is a former pollster for both Slick Willie and hildebeest, and he penned this op-ed for The Hill Wednesday. Originally Posted by I B Hankering

WOW! once again IBH hits it outta the Park! everyone who posts in this forum should read this! and i mean everyone ..

remember, this guy is a longtime democratic operative and even he knows a witch hunt when he sees one.

let's sample some of the interesting points, shall we?

"The plot to get President Trump out of office thickens, as Cohen obviously was his own mini crime syndicate and decided that his betrayals meant he would be better served turning on his old boss to cut the best deal with prosecutors he could rather than holding out and getting the full Manafort treatment."

the full Manafort treatment. lol. is that like the full monty and #Grubered?? hahaaa

"The sweetener for the prosecutors, of course, was getting Cohen to plead guilty to campaign violations that were not campaign violations. Money paid to people who come out of the woodwork and shake down people under threat of revealing bad sexual stories are not legitimate campaign expenditures. They are personal expenditures."

"Now, when it comes to Stormy Daniels, Cohen made a payment a few days before the election that Trump attorney Rudy Giuliani says was reimbursed. First, given that this payment was in October, it would never have been reported before the election campaign and so, for all intents and purposes, was immaterial as it relates to any effect on the campaign. What is clear in this plea deal is that, in exchange for overall leniency on his massive tax evasion, Cohen is pleading guilty to these other charges as an attempt to give prosecutors what they want, which is a Trump connection."

"On the Stormy Daniels payment that was made and reimbursed by Trump, it is again a question of whether that was made for personal reasons, especially since they have been trying since 2011 to obtain agreement. Just because it would be helpful to the campaign does not convert it to a campaign expenditure. Think of a candidate with bad teeth who had dental work done to look better for the campaign. His campaign still could not pay for it because it is a personal expenditure."

"Contrast what is going on here with the treatment of the millions of dollars paid to a Democratic law firm which, in turn, paid out money to political research firm Fusion GPS and British spy Christopher Steele without listing them on any campaign expenditure form, despite crystal clear laws and regulations that the ultimate beneficiaries of the funds must be listed. This rule was even tightened recently. There is no question that hiring spies to do opposition research in Russia is a campaign expenditure, yet no prosecutorial raids have been sprung on the law firm, Fusion GPS or Steele. The reason? It does not “get” Trump."

"With Cohen pleading guilty, there will be no test of soundness of the prosecution theories here, and it is yet another example of the double standards of justice of one investigation that gave Clinton aides and principals every benefit of the doubt and another investigation that targeted Trump people until they found unrelated crimes to use as leverage."

"Trump should do a better job of picking aides who pay their taxes, but he is not responsible for their financial problems and crimes. These investigations, essentially based on an opposition dossier, were never anything other than an attempt to push into a corner as many Trump aides and family members as possible and shake them down until they could get close enough to Trump to try to take him down."

"Paying for nondisclosure agreements for perfectly legal activities is not a crime, not a campaign contribution as commonly understood or ruled upon by the Federal Election Commission. Squeezing guilty pleas out of vulnerable witnesses does nothing to change those facts."


everyone should read the full article. i cannot wait to see the "usual suspects" here react!!!

Nice deflection! We both know your concept of practical and mine differ. But tell me how does Trump replacing everyone with slackers,liars and takers helping? Originally Posted by MT Pockets

How am I deflecting? How come you think Trump is replacing everyone with slackers, liars and takers? Is thinking like that a practical approach?

Jim

How am I deflecting? How come you think Trump is replacing everyone with slackers, liars and takers? Is thinking like that a practical approach?

Jim Originally Posted by Mr MojoRisin

You acted like I was wrong with my assumption for starters . Also my opinion of Trump doing that is also in agreement with your comment about the pay to play and that all politicians are crooked. I suggest you defend you assertions with folks that disagree with you. You make yourself look foolish when you contradict your own post. LOL!