You're Not Rambo - CCL holders piss their pants

Yes. But they are wanting to be educated and informed, as opposed to being a "know-it-all" like you, who would rather get your information from a media rag!

But since you are wrong on the law and wrong on the facts, what else is there?

Have you now exhausted your knowledge of CHL training regulations? Originally Posted by LexusLover

I never argued "CHL training regulations". I made a comment on simply what I saw in the video that was in the OfuckingP. I told you that the exaggeration was to make a point, one you obviously agreed with when you said this:

]
Just to keep on point ... I'm not an advocate for less training at all. I think it should have been more, a lot more, in the beginning....and should continue with additional training. Originally Posted by LexusLover

I have not been participating in the thread because I do not know about CCL training regulations and therefore am not qualified to be arguing it. Notice that giving an opinion based on what you see in a video IS NOT an argument, it's simply an opinion. Sure I could spend an hour or two reading up on CCL requirements like you do, but it's not worth my time. I don't care enough.

From what I've seen though, you're desparately losing your ass on substance to both Speedracer and Wombraider (Cue the DickSuckingKing), by repeating the same worn-down bullshit again and again. And by agreeing with whatever the other side is saying. Isn't this what the video is advocating all along?

]
Just to keep on point ... I'm not an advocate for less training at all. I think it should have been more, a lot more, in the beginning....and should continue with additional training. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Just admit your lying ass is wrong and move on. You're embarrassing yourself.

I never argued "CHL training regulations".


Just admit your lying ass is wrong and move on. You're embarrassing yourself. Originally Posted by shanm

Speaking of a lying piece of shit. That would be you!

If you're not "arguing" about "CHL training regulations" ... then on what basis would you tell me I'm wrong?

Your self-professed "knowledge" of "CHL training regulations"?

I'm not wrong.....the legislation and regulations speak for themselves.

If you're not "arguing" about "CHL training regulations" ... then on what basis would you tell me I'm wrong?

Your self-professed "knowledge" of "CHL training regulations"?

I'm not wrong.....the legislation and regulations speak for themselves. Originally Posted by LexusLover

On this basis:

From what I've seen though, you're desparately losing your ass on substance to both Speedracer and Wombraider, by repeating the same worn-down bullshit again and again. And by agreeing with whatever the other side is saying. Isn't this what the video is advocating all along? Originally Posted by shanm

It's mentioned in the very same fucking post that you decided to quote.

Funny how, according to you, DSK's subjective "LL is so smart!" was valid. But my opinion, based on verifiable evidence of what I have actually seen in this forum, is not.

You're digging the hole even further now. I would suggest you stop.

The sentence construction and lack of juvenile insults were pretty good. The problem is you failed to disprove the original hypothesis: LL is clearly smarter than you and BigTex. Since some of the other sub geniuses chimed in, let's include them among those less intellectually gifted than LL.
I don't have a problem with you disagreeing with him. Your quote, "he lacks advanced critical thinking skills or the ability to master syntax and spelling," just shows desperation from the ringleader of a losing cause. If you attack his arguments, you might score a point from time to time. If you attack his intelligence, you are merely showcasing your own emotional immaturity. Originally Posted by DSK

He rarely makes cogent points. It's hard to attack something that isn't there.

I would suggest you stop. Originally Posted by shanm

That suggestion is worth what I paid for it. But it does reflect motive.

And you think anyone gives a fuck about your opinion? Lets face it, If this was the very first time you were kissing someones ass maybe.....MAYBE....we would take you seriously. You're responsible for your own demise JL errr DSK.

The fact that you call LL "smart" while it is akin to fact that he is "fucking stupid" is pretty much enough to know that you are just an ass kisser. You chime in with this subjective ass-kissing every.single.time someone on your side is getting his ass handed to him. Do you really think it helps your case? Originally Posted by shanm

He is much smarter than you, also. You are just too dumb to realize it.

He is much smarter than you, also. You are just too dumb to realize it. Originally Posted by DSK

You're too dumb to realize many things. Thinking LL is smart is just the tip of the iceberg. You don't have a lot of sharp objects or furniture with pointed edges around, do you...

He is much smarter than you, also. You are just too dumb to realize it. Originally Posted by DSK

I'd believe you. If only you had something more to back your claim other than expatiated ass-kissing.

This is really simple to fix. When did you take your CCL class Baby Killer and Sha-na-na? Where did you take it?

This is really simple to fix. When did you take your CCL class Baby Killer and Sha-na-na? Where did you take it? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

And how many times did it take to "pass"?

Toss in Speedo to make the Three Musk-a-Tears.

And how many times did it take to "pass"?

Toss in Speedo to make the Three Musk-a-Tears. Originally Posted by LexusLover

Never took a class and no need to. I can read the contents of SB 864 without taking the class. Taking the course obviously didn't improve your reading or math skills.

SB 864: Currently, CHL classes must be 10-15 hours, including classroom instruction and range time. SB 864 separates the two elements; it requires the classroom instruction to be 4-6 hours and does not give a time constraint on the proficiency exam (shooting test at the range).

2014 - 1 = 2013. Figure that out yet???

Getting tired of having your ass handed to you yet?

...and does not give a time constraint on the proficiency exam (shooting test at the range).[/B][/COLOR]

2014 - 1 = 2013. Figure that out yet???

Getting tired of having your ass handed to you yet? Originally Posted by SpeedRacerXXX

Actually you handed yourself your own ass .... Thank you! That's about 5 x's.

You might want to go back to my original statement on the certification class.

It did NOT change the curriculum and it DID NOT CHANGE the length ....

....As I said the 2013 amendment and the following regs by the DPS ...

extracted the MANDATORY "proficiency" requirement from the In-Class block of instruction .. gave the In-Class block a 6 hour window ... and provided in effect that the MANDATORY "proficiency" block be what is:

"required to qualify.'

So you "think" it reduces the training time, because it separates the blocks.

No wonder you didn't take CHL to carry. You'd shoot yourself in the foot.

You already have 5x's at least in this thread. Go do something productive.

In reality what providers (CHL, not whores) were doing is taking the 10 hours, minimizing the academic instruction and maximizing the practical part of the instruction (proficiency), passing the students on the academics with their own testing and letting them "play with guns" on the range, which is what the student wanted to do in the first place .... which is why they signed up .... wanta-be-cowboys .... and the provider marketed the "increased" practicals...."playing with guns"!

Go back and look at the video that started this thread.

Little boy there was a good reason I was with a couple of District Attorneys (the elected officials) listening to the floor debate in the Senate 20+ years ago. Where were you? Still trying to move into the trailer park?

This says it all for you: "proficiency exam (shooting test at the range)."

This is really simple to fix. When did you take your CCL class Baby Killer and Sha-na-na? Where did you take it? Originally Posted by JD Barleycorn

You thought it was "simple"?

Gruber made it "simple" .... and they bought it, hook, line, and sinker.

Easy pickin's.

Actually you handed yourself your own ass .... Thank you! That's about 5 x's.

You might want to go back to my original statement on the certification class.

It did NOT change the curriculum and it DID NOT CHANGE the length ....

....As I said the 2013 amendment and the following regs by the DPS ...

extracted the MANDATORY "proficiency" requirement from the In-Class block of instruction .. gave the In-Class block a 6 hour window ... and provided in effect that the MANDATORY "proficiency" block be what is:

"required to qualify.'

So you "think" it reduces the training time, because it separates the blocks.

No wonder you didn't take CHL to carry. You'd shoot yourself in the foot.

You already have 5x's at least in this thread. Go do something productive.

In reality what providers (CHL, not whores) were doing is taking the 10 hours, minimizing the academic instruction and maximizing the practical part of the instruction (proficiency), passing the students on the academics with their own testing and letting them "play with guns" on the range, which is what the student wanted to do in the first place .... which is why they signed up .... wanta-be-cowboys .... and the provider marketed the "increased" practicals...."playing with guns"!

Go back and look at the video that started this thread.

Little boy there was a good reason I was with a couple of District Attorneys (the elected officials) listening to the floor debate in the Senate 20+ years ago. Where were you? Still trying to move into the trailer park?

This says it all for you: "proficiency exam (shooting test at the range)." Originally Posted by LexusLover

You continue to be the most pompous, over-bearing, ignorant person on this website.

This "little boy" could kick your fat ass any day of the week. Asshole.

THE LENGTH WAS CHANGED!!! You are just too stupid to understand it. It no longer takes 10 hours to obtain a CH in the state of Texas as it once did. You just won't admit it. Keep putting your idiot spin on it old man.

You anti-gun people seem to have forgotten what the discussion was all about (good thing, you were losing the argument), someone made the claim that you could walk into a gun store, spend an HOUR doing the paperwork, and walk out with a CCL. Such is not the case. I have taken classes in CT, FL, and KS. The least restrictive was CT. I had to pay to fill out paperwork for the state and I had to pay to fill out paperwork for the FBI. Then I had to contact someone who met the state qualification standard (NRA pistol instructor used by the police), then I went out on the range for about four hours of instruction and two hours of demonstrating my proficiency with three different handguns from 10 feet to 50 feet. The shooting was both timed and untimed. That was the least restrictive.

By the way, with the paperwork and the shooting, it took about a month to actually get the license.